Re: installation experiences (was: Testers wanted: New installation method)

2004-12-25 Thread Michael Banck
On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 08:00:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The artype=exustar option mentioned there isn't necessary however -- > at least with star 1.5a51 which I was using. Maybe it is just required when creating a tar archive with extended attributes suitable for passive translators.

Re: installation experiences (was: Testers wanted: New installation method)

2004-12-25 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, I've done another GNU/Hurd installation using the xattr Linux patch (still using the older http://people.debian.org/~mbanck/xattr-hurd/kernel-patch-xattr-hurd_20040302-4_all.deb , not the more recent http://people.debian.org/~mbanck/xattr-hurd/kernel-patch-xattr-hurd_20040302-5_all.deb ), and

Re: installation experiences (was: Testers wanted: New installation method)

2004-08-16 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:49:39AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have recently installed hurd from Debian GNU/Linux using the described > method, and (on special request ;-) ) want to share my experiences here. Thanks :) > Now many many warnings are generated ("operation not supported"); ig

installation experiences (was: Testers wanted: New installation method)

2004-08-15 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, I have recently installed hurd from Debian GNU/Linux using the described method, and (on special request ;-) ) want to share my experiences here. First I compiled an xattr-hurd enabled kernel: wget http://people.debian.org/~mbanck/xattr-hurd/kernel-patch-xattr-hurd_20040302-4_all.deb (N