joke/Debian secure by default (was Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd)

2002-05-21 Thread Manuel A.
On Ter, 2002-05-21 at 13:44, Niels Möller wrote: John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Debian (using a linux, bsd, or gnumach/l4 (micro)kernel) should be ``Secure by default.'' if this means that no firewalling - no debian release, then so be it. Strictly speaking FW-ing

Re: joke/Debian secure by default (was Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd)

2002-05-21 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 06:51:11PM +0200, Niels M?ller wrote: But my point was that, *by default*, the X server listens to tcp connections from anywhere. My gdm did not, BTW (It starts X itself). I had to enable it. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- One of the great things about books is sometimes

Re: joke/Debian secure by default (was Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd)

2002-05-21 Thread Manuel A.
On Ter, 2002-05-21 at 18:51, Niels Möller wrote: Manuel A. Fernández Montecelo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: try -nolisten TCP in the script launching X server ;) I'll try to remember that next time a restart the X server (which probably happens when I can upgrade to a released and stable

Re: joke/Debian secure by default (was Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd)

2002-05-21 Thread Wolfgang Jährling
Manuel A. Fernández Montecelo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Ter, 2002-05-21 at 18:51, Niels Möller wrote: I hope there will be a sensible list of release criteria, prepared with input from both the release manager the hurd folks, when Debian GNU/Hurd gets closer to release, and putting

Re: joke/Debian secure by default (was Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd)

2002-05-21 Thread Manuel A.
On Ter, 2002-05-21 at 20:10, Wolfgang Jährling wrote: Manuel A. Fernández Montecelo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Ter, 2002-05-21 at 18:51, Niels Möller wrote: I hope there will be a sensible list of release criteria, prepared with input from both the release manager the hurd folks, when