Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 13:58:08 +0100
From: Chris Lingard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > @@ -493,15 +498,15 @@
> > longjmp(GC_jmp_buf, 1);
> > }
> >
> > -# ifdef __STDC__
> > +# if defined(__STDC__) || defined(HURD)
> > typedef void (*handler)(int);
>
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 09:28:43AM +0100, Chris Lingard wrote:
> > diff -Naur libgc-5.0.alpha4/debian/rules new/debian/rules
> > --- libgc-5.0.alpha4/debian/rules Tue Apr 18 18:34:15 2000
> > +++ new/debian/rules Mon Apr 17 19:37:51 2000
> > @@ -16,6 +16,14 @@
> > #
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 09:28:43AM +0100, Chris Lingard wrote:
> diff -Naur libgc-5.0.alpha4/debian/rules new/debian/rules
> --- libgc-5.0.alpha4/debian/rules Tue Apr 18 18:34:15 2000
> +++ new/debian/rules Mon Apr 17 19:37:51 2000
> @@ -16,6 +16,14 @@
> # disable all threading
> THREADS :=
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
> Chris Lingard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > -# ifdef __STDC__
> > +# if defined(__STDC__) || defined(HURD)
> > typedef void (*handler)(int);
> > # else
> > typedef void (*handler)();
> > # endif
>
> Why is this; don't we have __STDC__ on the
Chris Lingard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -# ifdef __STDC__
> +# if defined(__STDC__) || defined(HURD)
> typedef void (*handler)(int);
> # else
> typedef void (*handler)();
> # endif
Why is this; don't we have __STDC__ on the Hurd?
5 matches
Mail list logo