Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are you saying ldconfig can't update the links on Hurd?
Exactly, as mentioned in #83669.
> Can this be fixed?
Sure. It ain't broke, though.
> My only concern is that the solution to another policy proposal
> presented to debian-policy (assuming it still
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 01:54:15PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Marcus> We could make it bail out with an error if something is
> Marcus> requested which isn't implemented. Sometimes,
> Marcus> debian/rules scripts run ld
> "Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcus> We could make it bail out with an error if something is
Marcus> requested which isn't implemented. Sometimes,
Marcus> debian/rules scripts run ldconfig to set links. So we
Marcus> want to provide an ldconfig d
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 12:35:26PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:19:53PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > > "Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Robbe> For one, it is unnecessary, and wastes time. But more
> > Robbe> importantly, the
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:19:53PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Robbe> For one, it is unnecessary, and wastes time. But more
> Robbe> importantly, the Hurd has no ld.so.cache, which kills
> Robbe> reason 2 on this platform.
> "Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robbe> For one, it is unnecessary, and wastes time. But more
Robbe> importantly, the Hurd has no ld.so.cache, which kills
Robbe> reason 2 on this platform. Debian GNU/Hurd systems also
Robbe> don't have reason 1, so ther
I propose that instead of calling "ldconfig", maintainer scripts of
packages containing shared libraries should call "ldconfig -X".
Background:
ldconfig has two purposes:
1. For each shared library, create/update a symbolic link from the
library's soname to the library file. The link is only ch
7 matches
Mail list logo
