Re: minimal Hurd system

2000-09-19 Thread Glenn McGrath
Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 01:47:05PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote: > > Im trying to make a small hurd system. > > Wonderful! > > > Currently i have got a bootable ststem at 5.6 MB, of this > > > > /hurd directory is 2.7MB > > /lib is 1.7MB > > /boot is 892 KB >

Re: minimal Hurd system

2000-09-19 Thread Jim Franklin
http://www.iu.hioslo.no/~mark/os/node121.html Jim - Original Message - From: "Tomasz Wegrzanowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Marcus Brinkmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Glenn McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000

Re: minimal Hurd system

2000-09-19 Thread Tomasz Wegrzanowski
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 05:04:12PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > ufs # ufs, probably optional Completely OT, but which filesystem is "better" for Hurd (theoretically, not current implementation): ext2fs or ufs ? What are architectural differences between them ? Any URL ?

Re: minimal Hurd system

2000-09-19 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 01:47:05PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote: > Im trying to make a small hurd system. Wonderful! > Currently i have got a bootable ststem at 5.6 MB, of this > > /hurd directory is 2.7MB > /lib is 1.7MB > /boot is 892 KB > /bin is 204KB (busybox binary) > /libe

minimal Hurd system

2000-09-18 Thread Glenn McGrath
Im trying to make a small hurd system. I previously mentioned that i was working on getting busybox working under the Hurd, i have enough working for it to be usefull, it fills out /bin, /sbin, /usr/sbin and /usr/bin pretty well, there is room for improvement though. busybox is at busybox.lineo.c