> Notice the _uppermem 523648_ statement there?
I guess this is becoming more and more an FAQ. Is this documented
somewhere?
I _think_ this was documented by Neal once... Or atleast I recall the
issue being discussed.
But adding it to the FAQ on hurd.gnu.org wouldn't be a bad idea...
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 08:07:58PM -0400, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
> A lot of hassle for sure. These are nasty horrible bugs which cause
> major problems. I see that crosshurd already has a big bug list against
> it so I doubt its been tested in a long time.
Well, I ran it two weeks ago without
It's been a long, long, time since I have had a working Hurd
installation. My old Tyan Thunder Pentium II system used an incompatible
SCSI card, and my new Asus A7N8X had simply defied all efforts of
booting any kind of gnumach until last night.
I had been fooling around with Bochs and the gnup
3 matches
Mail list logo
