Re: State of developers-reference

2009-09-09 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Wed,09.Sep.09, 06:57:10, Christian Perrier wrote: > As a start: > > - making it clearer in the i18n part that we're talking *first* about > i18n/l10n of *Debian material*, that is everything under debian/ > (mostly debconf) as well as everything in Debian *native* packages > (programs, document

Re: State of developers-reference

2009-09-08 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Andrei Popescu (andreimpope...@gmail.com): > Hello Christian, > > Could you make a list of those things to be added, more detailed, > whatever? As a start: - making it clearer in the i18n part that we're talking *first* about i18n/l10n of *Debian material*, that is everything under de

Re: State of developers-reference

2009-09-07 Thread Andrei Popescu
[dropping -devel from CC] > In that specific matter, the information is actually nowhere else but > in the head of a few i18n-crazy folks such as myself. I admit it would > be better to have it in the DevRef...:). I could say "OK, I'll take a > look and update"...but that could be a promise in the

Re: State of developers-reference

2009-09-07 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net): > - When doing talks about something at Debconf or at another conference, > take the opportunity to review and improve the corresponding dev-ref > section. (That applies to the i18n chapter of dev-ref, which is > apparently badly outdated).