Hi all,
now it's more than a week that Im using such pkg without any
problem. The patch found around seems to be clean and it works fine.
Does anyone encountered any problem???
Maybe the mantainer of proftpd will consider to push the patch directly
in the main archive.
Thanks
Fabio
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 10:22, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >Shouldn't this be wrapped in #ifdef linux?
> Who cares? It's not supposed to go upstream anyway.
Debian != Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello,
i was looking for some ipv6 hosts of the debian project, and thought I might
easyly find them on the ipv6 project page. But it seems that the link once
again points to limbo. On the debian homepage the link points to
p.d.o/~csmall/ipv6/ which is not found.
Where is the current place and wh
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
# If iputils-ping becomes the default, does that mean that ping6 should be
# installed by default, or should the package be split? Personally, since
# I am interested in improving native IPv6 in Debian, I'd like to see
# ping6 installed by default.
its t
On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 09:17:47AM +0700, Indra Kusuma wrote:
> its time for IPv6 to be enabled by default, it will not break anything.
> and just come to my mine maybe iputils-ping should split the ping6, same
> with iputils-tracepath split the traceroute6, and theres must be an IPv6
> virtual pac
On Aug 05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Another question: is it right, that there is no ipv6 (aaa) entry under whole
>debian.org domain?
http://ftp.it.debian.org/ is a mirror with IPv6 connectivity, and I know
there are at least one or two others. As soon as apache2 will support
P
I know of one instance where it has caused harm. KDE3 konqueror did not get
along well with the MP3.com website when the ipv6 flag was turned on.
Doubtless we did not have ipv6 configured correctly (or at all, really). Our
solution was to turn it off in KDE. My point is, I think there will
7 matches
Mail list logo
