Bernhard Schmidt wrote (Mon 2010-Sep-20 19:45:21 +):
I tried uncommenting all the label lines and reordering the
values to ensure that 2002::/16 got a higher value than
:::0:0/96; and I tried uncommenting all the precedence
lines and reordering the values (but 2002::/16 already
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote (Mon 2010-Sep-20 15:13:13 -0300):
Are you aware of the security implications? Unless you route the relevant
gateway prefixes yourself, you will be using a 6to4 gateway which can be
anywhere and belong to anyone, subject to the whims of BGP anycast.
Security
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Marcus C. Gottwald wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote (Mon 2010-Sep-20 15:13:13 -0300):
Are you aware of the security implications? Unless you route the relevant
gateway prefixes yourself, you will be using a 6to4 gateway which can be
anywhere and belong to
Marcus == Marcus C Gottwald m...@cheers.de writes:
Marcus Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote (Mon 2010-Sep-20 15:13:13
Marcus -0300):
Are you aware of the security implications? Unless you route the
relevant gateway prefixes yourself, you will be using a 6to4
gateway
4 matches
Mail list logo