On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 12:07:53AM -0700, The Orange Rider wrote:
Time and time again I read about how hosts don't need to have a
default gateway configured statically in IPv6 as they did in IPv4
becuase they will automatically discover the router via Neighbor
Discovery Protocol (through
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 09:05:28AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
I think (at least in my case) deactivating autoconfiguration when none
is possible is enough, and this is probably possible via
/etc/sysctl.conf.
No it is unfortunatelly not. Some stuff in IPv6 cannot be turned off.
Disabling the
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:06:33AM -0400, Robert L. Harris wrote:
Machine C: a 4th machine, single interface:
inet6 2001:730:11:17c::5/64 scope global
inet6 fe80::250:baff:fe37:a5b3/64 scope link
Which address of machine C have you tried?
Try to run tcpdump on machine C while
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:24:28AM +1300, Noodles wrote:
Thanks guys, I added the subnet 2001::/3 to my routing table, and it's
all working now
What kernel version, and have u turned ip-forwarding on (if so, why?)
Greetings
Bernd
--
(OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
( .. ) [EMAIL
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 10:56:48AM -0400, Bill Cerveny wrote:
changes caused by the router advertisements. route failed in my attempts
to remove the /64 blocks. I ultimately got rid of the routing problems by
rebooting the Linux systems.
output of the route command and the error message
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 06:42:24PM +, Daniel O'Neill wrote:
Hmm, i dunno... But, neighbour discovery all the same, it's a means of
passing packets anyway
Yes ND and arp are basically the same. Actually Linux is calling the V4
stuff ND, also.
The problem with IPv6 Auto Configuration (with
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:06:37PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Isn't neighbor discovery multicast, not broadcast, so it only goes to
some hosts on the subnet? A fairly small number of them?
Yes, Neighbour and Router Discovery uses Multicast in a special multicast
group partitioned by the
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 06:56:57PM -0400, Peter Cordes wrote:
Yes, Neighbour and Router Discovery uses Multicast in a special multicast
group partitioned by the last 32bits of the requested address. Unless you
have clever switches, this only means the host stacks have less to process,
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 10:04:05AM -, IPv IITKGP wrote:
As I am planning to set an isolated IPv6 network (intially), so
please let me know how i can do it... All the information like
setting up the router ect.
not sure why you need a router for an islated network, but it is pretty
easy.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 01:56:05PM +0200, Arthur van Leeuwen wrote:
Setting up a router allows you to use global addresses, thereby obviating
the need to specify which link to use when connecting to another box. Ever
tried to ping a link-local address? :)
Well, the unintelligent behaviour of
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:09:13AM +0300, Laitinen Ismo wrote:
ping6:
08:49:33.274608 e272.w3.ton.tut.fi 192.88.99.1: 2002:c1a6:5c4e::1
apple.kame.net: icmp6: echo request (encap)
08:49:33.592821 kddilab.6to4.jp e272.w3.ton.tut.fi: apple.kame.net
2002:c1a6:5c4e::1: icmp6: echo reply
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 05:15:36PM +0700, Indra Kusuma wrote:
there is an ipv6 tunnel tools to make easy to control the tunnel, feels
free to test and use it at http://debian.kusuma.or.id/tools/6tunnel
the deb package will be released soon.
Please dont add a single script as a new debian
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 10:57:21AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope that I soon will have the time to write a script that
automatically registers that systems in my DNS system.
As soon as it is written and a bit tested, sure :-)
Are you intending to use dyndns? that would be an
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:30:43AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like I don't have to touch any kernel params as long as the box is
atoconfigured.
In your case it is not autoconfigured, since you set up the prefix yourself:
address 3ffe:0400:0b60::a
up echo 0
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 12:39:57PM -0700, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
- it is possible to specify the pseudo default route 2000::/3 eth0 in
the ifupdown conf (without using rc.boot scripts) ?
I believe you can accomplish this using the up option to the
interface and having it do the
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 11:06:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i need to send a gratuitous arp to facilitate an ip-address takeover
scheme, so that other machines in the network will have correct
ethernet/ip address association.
use fake/heartbeat which can do that, or if you want to do
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 10:27:33PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Default routes bounce packets. Having a default route in Linux for IPv6 can
often lead to severe hair loss as you tear whatever is remaining out. For
reasons best left to the kernel hackers, using default routes just doesn't
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:30:26AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Is this linked somewhere from http://www.debian.org/devel/ ?
yes it is.
Greetings
Bernd
--
(OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
( .. ) [EMAIL PROTECTED],linux.de,debian.org} http://home.pages.de/~eckes/
o--o *plush*
Hello,
the link on http://www.debian.org/~csmall/ipv6/index.html to
http://www.misiek.eu.org/ipv6/.en/; seems a bit broken, removing the .en/
helps for me.
BTW: using
route -A inet6 add default gw 3ffe:1500:5:6::100
will produce:
::/0 3ffe:1500:5:6::100 UG 1 0 0 sit1
and
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 12:36:47AM +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
I am having really strange problems when trying to set up ipv6 tunnel,
i got a tunnel from a site near-by and to check what's wrong
I have also tried to set up freenet6's tunnel.
My setup is something like this:
ifconfig
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 03:42:08PM -0400, William F. Maton wrote:
3ffe is in 2000::/3.
3ffe 2001. They are different /16's.
Yes, but both networks 3ffe::/16 and 2001::/16 are covered (in) by a route
to 2000::/3
Greetings
Bernd
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 10:49:17PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
Lets imagine here we construct a tunnel from pandora to surf.net:
ip tunnel add surfnet mode sit local 132.229.131.40 remote 192.87.106.15
ip link set surfnet up
ip addr add 3ffe:600:8000:8::32 dev surfnet
Okay. Now we have
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 05:58:00PM -0600, Chad wrote:
crux:~# route -A inet6 add default gw fe80::206.123.31.102 dev sit1
default: Resolver Error 0 (no error)
I have to check this, but it is most likely a problem in route with the
default argument, try 2000::/2 instead.
Greetings
Bernd
--
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 02:57:00AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
I have to check this, but it is most likely a problem in route with the
default argument, try 2000::/2 instead.
to follow up to myself, this is fixed in the recent net-tools (1.57).
Attached is a patch wich should solve
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 07:10:12PM -0600, Chad wrote:
crux:~# route -A inet6 add default gw 2000::/2 dev sit1
default: Resolver Error 0 (no error)
I was talking about route -A inet6 add 2000::/2 gw fe80::206.123.31.102 dev
sit1
But I think you can skip the gw fe80::206.123.31.10 here, too.
25 matches
Mail list logo
