Re: Using IPv6 and ULA for greater resilience

2017-06-22 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 14/05/17 23:07, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Daniel Pocock <dan...@pocock.pro> wrote: >> For a home network or a small office, what is the best practice >> for using ULA in parallel with the prefix from an ISP? > >> Consider the following: > >> -

Using IPv6 and ULA for greater resilience

2017-05-13 Thread Daniel Pocock
For a home network or a small office, what is the best practice for using ULA in parallel with the prefix from an ISP? Consider the following: - router (OpenWRT or Debian) receives prefix delegation from ISP and shares it, and also a ULA prefix, over the LAN with DHCPv6 - there is a small

Re: IPv6 status on Debian for workstations / DHCP networks?

2013-07-10 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 10/07/13 14:12, Axel Beckert wrote: Hi Daniel, Daniel Pocock wrote: Ok, I've tried dhcpy6d as well, it seems to offer MAC address matching (which some people may find convenient) and I've created an ITP for it Not sure why this shouldn't work with ISC's DHCPd. Works fine for me. It's how

testing dhcpy6d (python) server?

2013-07-08 Thread Daniel Pocock
I've had a brief look at dhcpy6d, it is a DHCPv6 server written in Python so it probably offers some opportunity for those people who are using dhcpd scripts Has anybody else looked at it? Is there anybody else who may be able to sponsor it? wnpp bug:

Re: IPv6 status on Debian for workstations / DHCP networks?

2013-07-08 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 06/07/13 18:25, Philipp Kern wrote: On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 03:59:41PM -0700, Kenyon Ralph wrote: On 2013-07-05T10:38:44-0400, Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca wrote: Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote: dhcpd does not have to run on the router. DHCPv6 servers are found

Re: IPv6 status on Debian for workstations / DHCP networks?

2013-07-08 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 08/07/13 10:56, Andrew Shadura wrote: Hello, On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:14:54 +0200 Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote: For IPv4, if somebody doesn't want NM, they can just put iface eth0 inet dhcp in their interfaces file and it works for just about any network. Since wheezy

Re: IPv6 status on Debian for workstations / DHCP networks?

2013-07-05 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 05/07/13 15:09, Michael Richardson wrote: Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote: After getting servers onto IPv6, I recently had a go at trying to run IPv6 on a LAN with workstations Currently, for IPv4 a) dhcpd does not run on the router, it runs on a Debian server

Re: IPv6 status on Debian for workstations / DHCP networks?

2013-07-05 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 05/07/13 16:38, Michael Richardson wrote: Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote: dhcpd does not have to run on the router. DHCPv6 servers are found by multicast. Unless you set M=1 in your RAs, your hosts will not use DHCPv6 for address allocation, so it makes little

Re: IPv6 status on Debian for workstations / DHCP networks?

2013-07-05 Thread Daniel Pocock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/07/13 20:14, Andrew Shadura wrote: Hello, On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 10:12:24 -0700 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: Is there a way to configure the interfaces file to just work on any network, without NetworkManager? Nope. Not

IPv6 status on Debian for workstations / DHCP networks?

2013-07-04 Thread Daniel Pocock
After getting servers onto IPv6, I recently had a go at trying to run IPv6 on a LAN with workstations Currently, for IPv4 a) dhcpd does not run on the router, it runs on a Debian server b) the LAN uses DHCP and dynamic DNS updates between isc-dhcp and bind For IPv6, radvd is on the router: it

Re: Advice from upstream / ISC

2013-07-04 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 04/07/13 21:04, Sebastian Kricner wrote: Also notice that my setup is not using client based DDNS. I have not tested client based DDNS. Just as they state: https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/2008-August/007031.html Thanks for that link - that provides a much more clear