problems with any desktop, home LAN, exim, or ssh stuff.
When does it become time to do mass bug reports on packages that break
with IPv6?
There might be a packages with bugs, but I would be surprised at having to
do _mass_ bug reports.
--
#define X(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X([EMAIL
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:31:48PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 21:32, Peter Cordes wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 03:41:44PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Couldn't you do (b) the way SSH handles server public keys?
Sure, I suppose so, at least on hosts
should accept
advertisments from only a single trusted identity, then it should be told
that, so it knows that any advertisments signed with new IDs are attacks,
and not some new source of legitimate advs.)
--
#define X(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X([EMAIL PROTECTED] , ns.ca)
The gods
/64 ;)
But if you have one you got the rest too...
Moreover, until IPv4 goes away, if you find and infect a dual-stack host
over IPv4, the worm can use the link-local v6 stuff to find (and try to
infect) even v6-only hosts on the same network.
--
#define X(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X
this?
http://www.scyld.com/network/tulip.html
Good description is here: http://www.ngnet.it/e/ipv6proto/ipv6-proto-6.php
I only skimmed this, sorry if something in there answers my question.
--
#define X(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X([EMAIL PROTECTED] , ns.ca)
The gods confound the man who
, and then see if the module works for you.
--
#define X(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X([EMAIL PROTECTED] , ns.ca)
The gods confound the man who first found out how to distinguish the hours!
Confound him, too, who in this place set up a sundial, to cut and hack
my day so wretchedly
the argument that people who need stability will stick with v4, so
the most important testing is on v4-only machines.
--
#define X(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X([EMAIL PROTECTED] , ns.ca)
The gods confound the man who first found out how to distinguish the hours!
Confound him, too, who
, just
pointing out that there might be a good alternative. (good mostly
because squid does caching, which is great if you point a bunch of
machines at it. (increase maximum_object_size to 10 KB so it will
cache even the big .debs))
--
#define X(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X([EMAIL
port and
intercept the connections you were expecting to receive. If the port is
1023, then that is a real security problem.
Just thought I'd point that out, in case not everybody had thought of this
yet :)
--
#define X(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X([EMAIL PROTECTED] , ns.ca)
The gods
(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X([EMAIL PROTECTED] , ns.ca)
The gods confound the man who first found out how to distinguish the hours!
Confound him, too, who in this place set up a sundial, to cut and hack
my day so wretchedly into small pieces! -- Plautus, 200 BCE
, which mentions
...
* Full AGP 2X/AGP 4X support (up to 1GB/s bandwidth)
...
(i.e. 8 Gbit/s. I guess my numbers were off, or something :(
Tim.
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Peter Cordes wrote:
What about AGP? A server needs IO bandwidth more than video bandwidth, so
why aren't there AGP
11 matches
Mail list logo
