Re: Using IPv6 and ULA for greater resilience

I just made a similar setup this week. In my case I just used a router / firewall with NAT66 support. I generated the ULA using one of the online ULA generators. Then configured the firewall in NAT4 and NAT6. You can assign static addresses in the ULA subnet for the key hosts and let the

Re: Using IPv6 and ULA for greater resilience

On 14/05/17 23:07, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Daniel Pocock wrote: >> For a home network or a small office, what is the best practice >> for using ULA in parallel with the prefix from an ISP? > >> Consider the following: > >> - router (OpenWRT or Debian) receives prefix

Re: Using IPv6 and ULA for greater resilience

Daniel Pocock wrote: > For a home network or a small office, what is the best practice for > using ULA in parallel with the prefix from an ISP? > Consider the following: > - router (OpenWRT or Debian) receives prefix delegation from ISP and > shares it,

Re: Using IPv6 and ULA for greater resilience

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 09:34:28AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > - the aim is that if either the router or server stop working, > everything else (e.g. local DNS, communication between other local > machines) keeps working using the ULA prefix. Example: if the router > stops working, the local

Re: Using IPv6 and ULA for greater resilience

With dhcpy6d you can hand out multiple addresses to your clients - static ULAs and random GUAs for example. DNS synchronisation works well with ISC Bind. See https://dhcpy6d.ifw-dresden.de for details. Regards -- Henri Wahl IT Department Leibniz-Institut fuer Festkoerper- u.

Using IPv6 and ULA for greater resilience

For a home network or a small office, what is the best practice for using ULA in parallel with the prefix from an ISP? Consider the following: - router (OpenWRT or Debian) receives prefix delegation from ISP and shares it, and also a ULA prefix, over the LAN with DHCPv6 - there is a small