On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 09:04:24AM -0500, William F. Maton wrote:
The classic response from upstream authors is: I don't have IPv6 on my
system, therefore can't validate whether or not your patch destabilizes my
stable code, so I won't accept it.
Andthen it degenerates into another chicken
Previously Peter Cordes wrote:
If maintainers think that v6 is too experimental, etc., then they might
accept the argument that people who need stability will stick with v4, so
the most important testing is on v4-only machines.
I'll see if I can get ipv6 on pandora back online.
Wichert.
--
On Feb 19, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll see if I can get ipv6 on pandora back online.
We could at least set up 6to4 on all machines, it's trivial:
http://www.linux.it/~md/6to4
--
ciao,
Marco
Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Feb 17, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually it would be very cool to have just one entry in our sources.list
file like
deb http://ipv6.debian.org/debian and so on.
Managing an official repository with dkatie is a lot of work.
I agree that can be a
Hi all,
as usual is not to blame someone but Im wondering why all people
like Kitame, Marco D'Itri, probably someone else and sometimes me
cannot have a common repository where to store ipv6 enabled pkgs???
Sometimes it's really frustrating to go around to fetch these pkgs.
Actually it
5 matches
Mail list logo
