At 11:08 AM 3/2/00 +0200, I. Forbes wrote:
>To give you an idea of the scope of the problem we have received
>about eleven thousand bounces with the same forged address over
>the last month. All of the Spam was launced from AOL, and relayed
>using a whole list of open relays - many in Eastern E
At 01:44 PM 3/2/00 +0100, Michael Koehne wrote:
> The most drastic method is "mudslicking" providers of foreign countries.
> IMHO mudslicking is the most effective method to counter SPAM.
This something you do NOT want to be on the wrong side of. IMHO spam is not
a serious enough offense to war
Which particular hack regularly creates a user called r and another called
re on a system?
Where can I get the scripts, and I'll figure out whats needed to make them
stop.
thanks.
Ciao,
Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 03:39:52PM -0600, Andrius Kasparavicius wrote:
> www.europeonline.com for 15$ per month gives 0,5MBPS via sattelite. I
> think 15$ is really low cost for the 0.5 online. Maybe here is who tryed
> this provider. Please give his opinion about this service.
well...we subsc
> So you need a policy based router/firewall to deceide, wether one of
> your packets should have an IP number for your leased line, or an IP
> number from the Europeonline pool.
I think there is little problem that Europeonline gives PRIVATE IP, and I
cant configure it only via router. I n
Moin Andrius Kasparavicius,
> www.europeonline.com for 15$ per month gives 0,5MBPS via sattelite. I
> think 15$ is really low cost for the 0.5 online. Maybe here is who tryed
> this provider. Please give his opinion about this service.
We have sold it, and well $15 for private customers is low
hello again,
www.europeonline.com for 15$ per month gives 0,5MBPS via sattelite. I
think 15$ is really low cost for the 0.5 online. Maybe here is who tryed
this provider. Please give his opinion about this service.
> # #proxy icp
> # # hostname type port port options
> # # - - ---
> # cache_peer parent.foo.net parent3128 3130 [proxy-only]
Nice.
my pro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Relays are !NOT! innocent, they are so bad administrated, that they
> relay SPAM. Those sites deserve to become reinstalled.
They need to be sorted. DOSing them is probably not a reasonable
answer, although we may disagree on this. Continuing that specific
point
Moin Nigel Metheringham,
> The Teergrube solution is *not* in any way a solution to your problem -
> don't even consider it. Remember that the machines sending you these
> bounces and complaints are probably innocently of any proper
> involvement in this spam run. There are also likely to be
> We send copies of this spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a daily basis.
> The only response I have ever had from AOL is from an
> autoresponder.
hmm...
>From my experience AOL has always been quite cooperative in such cases,
though we always called them directly when there was a major spam
problem..
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000 11:08:20 +0200, I. Forbes wrote:
>Hello All
>
>A professional spammer is using a forged "From:" header line
>which quotes a non existant address at one of our domains. Every
>spam he sends to a bad address gets bounced to us. We are
>running qmail, which by default, accepts
[I am somewhat concerned about the size of the cc list - in that it
covers several lists - but for now have let it stand since this is more
than just an exim issue]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> We send copies of this spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a daily basis. The
> only response I have ever had
Hello All
A professional spammer is using a forged "From:" header line
which quotes a non existant address at one of our domains. Every
spam he sends to a bad address gets bounced to us. We are
running qmail, which by default, accepts these bounces then
handles them as "double bounces".
To
From: Nathan Ridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> when trying to setup a name record for a .nu domain, i am getting
this
> error:
You most certainly have a syntactic error in your named.conf. How does
the entry for your domain look like?
when trying to setup a name record for a .nu domain, i am getting this
error:
Mar 2 12:30:06 webserver named[19164]: no type specified for zone 'wmtc.nu'
Mar 2 12:30:06 webserver named[19164]: zone 'wmtc.nu' did not validate,
skippin
g
im assuming that it does know recognize the .nu domain. Any
16 matches
Mail list logo
