Re: Policy for use of Group Names

On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, I. Forbes wrote: > adm:4: can read /var/log files > tty:x:5: > disk:x:6: > cdrom:x:24: > floppy:x:25: > tape:x:26: use certain /dev devices > staff:x:50: miscellaneous files and directories like: /home/f/ and /usr/local/ > games:x:60: I don't play games, but maybe for w

MAN WITH A HUGE COCK

<>

Re: Policy for use of Group Names

On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 04:04:02PM +0200, I. Forbes wrote: > Any comments would be appreciated. mosty these march appropiate files in /dev, e.g. add a user to "audio", and he'll be able to play music, add him to "dip" and he'll be able to dial out that's just what i learnt.. i guess there is so

Policy for use of Group Names

Hello All I am looking at drawing up a policy for some of our local machines and also client machines that we administer. Certain grades of users will be made members of groups with specific privileges. Then I can tweak things so that member of those groups have access to things like read lo

Re: Front Page Extensions :-(

ridgey wrote: > > I know microsoft is prolly not a favoured word around these parts, but i > figure trying to get Frontpage extensions working on Debian is a better than > using a NT box 'o' crap. Has anyone sucessfully goy FP2000 or FP98 > extensions working under debian. I had a go but had no l

cool [was Re: restricted ftp (binded to a private net only)]

as the Mar 27 comic from userfriendly goes, "Holy Root. I've been missing so much!" thanks a lot for the xinetd tip Phil :-) ... it ROCKS !!! chad > > xinetd: > > > > Release

Re: restricted ftp (binded to a private net only)

in the config-file; listen 10.1.1.5 if the ftpserveris 10.1.1.5, and supports the syntax. -Christofer On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Chad A. Adlawan wrote: > hello everyone, > > our web server has 2 NIC's on it, one's a public IP and the other a > private 10.1.1.x. > can someone shed me som

Front Page Extensions :-(

I know microsoft is prolly not a favoured word around these parts, but i figure trying to get Frontpage extensions working on Debian is a better than using a NT box 'o' crap. Has anyone sucessfully goy FP2000 or FP98 extensions working under debian. I had a go but had no luck at all, especially w

Re: restricted ftp (binded to a private net only)

Typing away merrily, Chad A. Adlawan produced the immortal words: > our web server has 2 NIC's on it, one's a public IP and the other a > private 10.1.1.x. > can someone shed me some light as to how do i provide ftp service in that > server BUT the daemon has to be visible on the 10.1.1

Re: restricted ftp (binded to a private net only)

Get an FTP server that will bind to a particular address, that doesn't run from inetd. My suggestion would be NcFTPd (www.ncftpd.com). It's commercial, but it's cheap, and will save you more in headaches than it costs. On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Chad A. Adlawan wrote: > hello everyone, > > our w

restricted ftp (binded to a private net only)

hello everyone, our web server has 2 NIC's on it, one's a public IP and the other a private 10.1.1.x. can someone shed me some light as to how do i provide ftp service in that server BUT the daemon has to be visible on the 10.1.1.x network only ? this is because we want only ports

Re: Frozen Messages (Exim)

On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Fraser Campbell wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > 39d 2.1K 12Mc06-0006sT-00 <> *** frozen *** > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > manpage so I didn't know what it could do until now. Isn't there a way to > force exim to automatically clear these messages from the queue

Re: Frozen Messages (Exim)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 39d 2.1K 12Mc06-0006sT-00 <> *** frozen *** > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Using eximon, unfreeze it, and try to force delivery. You'll see > the message why it was frozen. Actually just doing that now. I have tried eximon before but just read the manpage so I did

Re: Frozen Messages (Exim)

On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 02:38:34AM +, Fraser Campbell wrote: > I installed Exim on a spare server of ours (Debian/Sparc) to act as a > secondary MX for all of the domains we host. It worked like a charm from > the moment I installed it with one small problem. > > There are getting to be a lot

Frozen Messages (Exim)

I installed Exim on a spare server of ours (Debian/Sparc) to act as a secondary MX for all of the domains we host. It worked like a charm from the moment I installed it with one small problem. There are getting to be a lot of messages in the queue that shouldn't be there. There are messages in t