On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Chris Wagner wrote:
AFAIK, the hosts.* files only affect daemons run out of inetd, not
stand-alones.
not true. they are ued by any program which has libwrap support.
--
[-]
kazmer at any cost ! ++ Minek olvasol linux-kezdot ha nem birod ? - sstu
Hi,
does anybody know about some great mailserver solutions for ISP use. Some
features it has to know is VirtualHost support, a WebMail interface,
administration per web, etc.
kind regards,
achim hendriks
mediagenic services
Postfix+Courier+IMP.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
does anybody know about some great mailserver solutions for ISP use. Some
features it has to know is VirtualHost support, a WebMail interface,
administration per web, etc.
kind regards,
achim hendriks
I am putting together a couple of servers that will become PCI
bus bottlenecked.
I haven't found very many motherboards that have multiple PCI buses.
The Intel L44GX+ has taken the AGP port (PCI 66) and used it for
PCI slots instead, but has some bug report against this second PCI
where the
Aaron Dewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Postfix+Courier+IMP.
... and for the per web administration ?
I use qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+IMP and it works fine.
--
Francois Deppierraz student
http://www.ctrlaltdel.ch
ICQ: 176 770 09
On 12 Apr 2000, Francois Deppierraz wrote:
Aaron Dewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Postfix+Courier+IMP.
... and for the per web administration ?
I use qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+IMP and it works fine.
ditto. qmail has been very solid for me in high-volume environments and
the vpopmail
6 matches
Mail list logo