Chea,
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Chea Prince wrote:
> i've tried unsubscribing via debian-isp-request (and received an
> unsubscribe confirmation)...still i'm receiving mail. i've written to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and been ignored. now i'm asking
> politely...please remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from this ma
i've tried unsubscribing via debian-isp-request (and received an
unsubscribe confirmation)...still i'm receiving mail. i've written to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and been ignored. now i'm asking
politely...please remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from this mailing list. FQDN is
noel.pd.org, so could be it shows u
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, ridgey wrote:
> We had a problem with a name record that other day that failed it to load
> thus causing some email problems. Since then ( around 2 days ago now ) we
> fixed the name record and made sure it loaded without errors, updated serial
> # etc. Now we have these SM
Chea,
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Chea Prince wrote:
> i've tried unsubscribing via debian-isp-request (and received an
> unsubscribe confirmation)...still i'm receiving mail. i've written to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and been ignored. now i'm asking
> politely...please remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from this m
We had a problem with a name record that other day that failed it to load
thus causing some email problems. Since then ( around 2 days ago now ) we
fixed the name record and made sure it loaded without errors, updated serial
# etc. Now we have these SMTP data timeouts all through the logs, I
und
i've tried unsubscribing via debian-isp-request (and received an
unsubscribe confirmation)...still i'm receiving mail. i've written to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and been ignored. now i'm asking
politely...please remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from this mailing list. FQDN is
noel.pd.org, so could be it shows
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, ridgey wrote:
> We had a problem with a name record that other day that failed it to load
> thus causing some email problems. Since then ( around 2 days ago now ) we
> fixed the name record and made sure it loaded without errors, updated serial
> # etc. Now we have these S
unsubscribe
We had a problem with a name record that other day that failed it to load
thus causing some email problems. Since then ( around 2 days ago now ) we
fixed the name record and made sure it loaded without errors, updated serial
# etc. Now we have these SMTP data timeouts all through the logs, I
un
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 04:25:10PM -0400, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
> anyone who can recommend a good motherboard for small to medium sized web
> server would be greatly appreciated.
> I'd like to get boards that have onboard integraed LAN and video.
ASL makes nifty little 1U machines. See aslab.com
unsubscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, I figured you wanted it in a 1u, since you mentioned the
integrated video. These will fit. That's what Akamai has done. They
sacrifice the dual processor ability, use a slot1 riser card for each cpu
slot and stick the terminator in one, cpu in other, and use some sort of
small ducted-f
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 04:25:10PM -0400, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
> anyone who can recommend a good motherboard for small to medium sized web
> server would be greatly appreciated.
> I'd like to get boards that have onboard integraed LAN and video.
ASL makes nifty little 1U machines. See aslab.com
Actually, I figured you wanted it in a 1u, since you mentioned the
integrated video. These will fit. That's what Akamai has done. They
sacrifice the dual processor ability, use a slot1 riser card for each cpu
slot and stick the terminator in one, cpu in other, and use some sort of
small ducted-
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 09:54:21AM +0200, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
>
> It would be a nightmare of races. Why not just use an already proven
> - albeit not security perfect and sometimes a bit elaborate, but hey,
> that's software :) - solution like PAM?
That was my first inclination, but (perhaps
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 01:28:13AM -0600, Art Sackett wrote:
> Just a thought, might not even work: howzabout defining the user's shell
> (in /etc/passwd) to be a symlink, say, /bin/timelock, then just wiggling
> the symlink twice per day via cron to target either /bin/false or
> /bin/bash, as app
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 03:02:24PM +0800, Erik Peter P. Abella wrote:
> I intend to toggle the user
> shell (/bin/false - /bin/nologin) via the crontab but am still gun-shy
> on
> writing a shell script.
Just a thought, might not even work: howzabout defining the user's shell
(in /etc/passwd) t
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 03:02:24PM +0800, Erik Peter P. Abella wrote:
> I need to be able to restrict some users from logging-on from 8am-11pm
> daily (a new discounted subscription plan) and I could use some
> suggestions on how to best deal with this. I intend to toggle the user
> shell (/bin/fal
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 03:02:24PM +0800, Erik Peter P. Abella wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I need to be able to restrict some users from logging-on from 8am-11pm
> daily (a new discounted subscription plan) and I could use some
> suggestions on how to best deal with this. I intend to toggle the user
>
Hello All,
I need to be able to restrict some users from logging-on from 8am-11pm
daily (a new discounted subscription plan) and I could use some
suggestions on how to best deal with this. I intend to toggle the user
shell (/bin/false - /bin/nologin) via the crontab but am still gun-shy
on
writing
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 09:54:21AM +0200, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
>
> It would be a nightmare of races. Why not just use an already proven
> - albeit not security perfect and sometimes a bit elaborate, but hey,
> that's software :) - solution like PAM?
That was my first inclination, but (perhaps
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 01:28:13AM -0600, Art Sackett wrote:
> Just a thought, might not even work: howzabout defining the user's shell
> (in /etc/passwd) to be a symlink, say, /bin/timelock, then just wiggling
> the symlink twice per day via cron to target either /bin/false or
> /bin/bash, as ap
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 03:02:24PM +0800, Erik Peter P. Abella wrote:
> I intend to toggle the user
> shell (/bin/false - /bin/nologin) via the crontab but am still gun-shy
> on
> writing a shell script.
Just a thought, might not even work: howzabout defining the user's shell
(in /etc/passwd)
23 matches
Mail list logo
