It's a pain in the ass to maintain an ability to track users sending spam
from your dialups and through your server if you don't have each user
authenticate and the connections all apear to hit the mail server from the
firewall.
That's what vetoed ours for a long time.
Then we just got a few mor
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Kevin wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone can tell me sort of problems I would have
> if I assigned internal ips to our customers and used ipmasq.
> Basically I don't want to do this, but I need some sort of firepower
> to persuade my boss that he doesn't want it either.
I was wondering if anyone can tell me sort of problems I would have
if I assigned internal ips to our customers and used ipmasq.
Basically I don't want to do this, but I need some sort of firepower
to persuade my boss that he doesn't want it either. Any
info/link/short coming of age st
... using NFS you need to ensure, that all services accessing files on
the shared mounts rely on the same locking mechanisms - does not sem to
bee a viable path to me. But hav a look at SGI. they portet theire
XFileSystem (XFS) to linux and theres a cXFS (cluster XFS) version
available.
did not y
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Andreas Rabus wrote:
> "Error Creating AF_INET socket (Operation now in progress)"
yah..there really is some bugs...
-
Kasparavicius Andrius
__
Greetings,
sitting in my box, checking my logs...
and trying to log from Host A to Host B with tcp i always get some strange
"error" Messages when starting my syslog-ng with option "-d":
"Error Creating AF_INET socket (Operation now in progress)"
The log are setup up as in the demo configura
You could try linuxvirtualserver.org the LVS project, and/or ultramonkey
(.sourceforge.net) which incorporates LVS and heartbeat.
using ultramonkey (albiet on RedHat) we just finished running a large
promotional site, servers where maintanenced, taken completely off line, no
one ever noticed. Co
Mr. Ghost,
I have found that most of the time the /etc/rc.boot directory works
very well for starting your own services or making machine-specific
setting changes -- like scripts to set up ipchains or iptables.
It's one of those directories where everything gets executed in
alpanumeric sort orde
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Gregory Wood wrote:
> Several years ago, I sudied the HP 9000 family. It had this ability.
> Their system had different programs running on different servers which
> minimized the file locking issues. When one computer failed, the other
> would start up the tasks from the fail
Hello All,
I have a simple question that I hope someone can answer.
What is the general init file that I would be able to start
new services from on reboot, so that I would not have to manually
start services (processes) on reboot.
i.e- portsentry
I would assume somewhere in /etc/init.d there wo
Several years ago, I sudied the HP 9000 family. It had this ability. Their system had
different programs running on different servers which minimized the file locking
issues. When one computer failed, the other would start up the tasks from the failed
machine. The switch over time was under a f
> Has anyone tried to set up any such debian systems?? I'm thinking of
i had to do something like that, but temporarily only.
later I've seen the same setup on novell conference and they call it
'their clustering solution' and sold licenses for that for big money.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello..
Has anyone tried to set up any such debian systems?? I'm thinking of
trying to set up two machines sharing the same raid disksystem as an NFS
server with some sort of ip-takeover between them.. There are several
things I'm seeing as possible problems, one is NFS file locking, and
another
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:16:00AM +0200, Fredrik Liljegren wrote:
> Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 09:56:44AM +0200, Fredrik Liljegren wrote:
> > > Oct 2 08:52:04 bifrost sshd[228]: debug: Forked child 18444.
> > > Oct 2 08:53:19 bifrost sshd[18444]: Conn
14 matches
Mail list logo
