On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 09:57:51PM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> I used route reject to block an IP. To get access back to the blocked IP,
> I had to add a gateway for the host. Does anyone know how I can get rid of
> the blocked entry?
>
> This is what I did first:
>
> /sbin/route add -host
To Joshua,
My top reasons are
a.) to write good code
b.) to express myself in my code
c.) to read and write in an logical fashion
d.) to help others do the same
e.) to make
And for what study is this for?
Thanks,
Trent
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the future didn't exist, somebody would h
I used route reject to block an IP. To get access back to the blocked IP,
I had to add a gateway for the host. Does anyone know how I can get rid of
the blocked entry?
This is what I did first:
/sbin/route add -host aa.bb.cc.200 reject # IP changed!
What do I do to undo this?
I worked around
five reasons, I'll come as close as I can.
1) I know now that I am not good enough at guitar to keep me fed.
2) Up until not to long ago, you couldn't get paid to rock climb.
3) My times were not good enough at swimming to send me to the olympics.
4) I prefer a non dangerous night job.
5) I like
> Well, all you guys forgot one thing.. The Art!!! All we want to do is to
good point.
> Then of course, it's also the pure joy of revelling in the sea of
> knowledge, and oppress the poor lusers and management.. :-)
right, link to bofh've been already mentioned ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
> writing something like 'all people using computers are socipaths. so the
> computers are devil's creation and must be destroyed' :)))
Hmm, but that is mostly true.
I wonder how one would destroy people using computers, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
but seriously, isps make money from those kind of
Well, all you guys forgot one thing.. The Art!!! All we want to do is to
create The Ultimate Code, the one we cry when we see. And as all true
artists we are shunned by the people, those cretins who dont see the
light. (Wonder if it's time for cutting of one ear now??) :-)
Then of course, it's a
On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>
>
> > And, computers are easier to communicate with :) ( I sometimes hate humans
> you see, I told you that already :)
>
That's interesting... May be that guy is just collecting info about us,and
writing something like 'all people using computer
> And, computers are easier to communicate with :) ( I sometimes hate humans
you see, I told you that already :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Joshua Abbott wrote:
> Hello,
> Could someone please indulge me and give me 5 reasons why they would like to go into
>computers for a job (or why they did)?
http://bofh.ntk.net/Bastard.html
:) That should be enough
And, computers are easier to communicate with :) (
> Could someone please indulge me and give me 5 reasons why they would like
> to go into computers for a job (or why they did)?
hmm, maybe this will help:
1) people are evil
2) personal preferences ( physics, then maths, then discovered
programming)
3) people are evil
4) computer jobs give you m
Hello,
Could someone please indulge me and give me 5
reasons why they would like to go into computers for a job (or why they
did)?
Thanks
Joshua
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Even for the "standard" protocols it fails if you need to connect to a
> port not handled by the module. Example: the ip_masq_irc watches only
fails? since when? it works perfectly.
> something, not everything (here: DCC) will work.
dah??
DCC works like a charm, where did you get an idea it d
> if I assigned internal ips to our customers and used ipmasq.
tcp/ip was designed based on idea that one ip means one network
interface, various problems arises with introduction of NAT
- things like gnutella and napster don't work very well from behind NAT,
there are problems with x-clie
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Kevin wrote:
>
> I was wondering if anyone can tell me sort of problems I would have
> if I assigned internal ips to our customers and used ipmasq.
> Basically I don't want to do this, but I need some sort of firepower
> to persuade my boss that he doesn't want it eit
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 04:59:39PM -0700, Kevin wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone can tell me sort of problems I would have
> if I assigned internal ips to our customers and used ipmasq.
Merely thinking about it says 'no' ..
Since there might be protocols using IPs within themselves that ar
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
I believe this is a project between RedHat and TCX, building multi
server redundancy. (So shoot me if I am wrong.) You might want to
search sourceforge and mysql sites before going too far.
> Hello
>
> Has anyone ever tried
Yes, we've faced this problem and are planning a solution.
We've not coded anything yet, but have plans for a couple of months. Maybe
it could be an Open Source project if there's nothing pre-existing. I'd
want the daemon interfaces to be DB independant.
Basic idea is to seperate the Queries fr
Hello
Has anyone ever tried to make a webserver host with a mysql database
(used for a session database that gets updated on every click) redundant
by adding an exactly same computer and do DNS-load balancing?
If there were no SQL database this would be no problem, two web-servers
that access a
19 matches
Mail list logo
