[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
> Has anyone gotten lvm to work under Linux? I remember with fondness my AIX
> experience with lvm. I'd love to see it work on some of my big boxen.
>
> Tim
Yes, I am running it here (but in a non-production enviroment). It seems
like it works just fine and I am
Hello,
since a couple of days my dsl connection is not stable anymore and now I
am searching for some self-recoverable configuration for my server.
I now use the 'persist' option in pppd, as suggested in a previous answer
to my question. This option seems to look to echorequests. Today my
connec
I upgraded several machines from slink to potato before Debian 2.2 was
released. Usually, I upgraded apt to a newer version, changed the
sources.list to point to potato (or unstable), did "apt-get update", then
"apt-get dist-upgrade", and then answered questions for 30+ minutes while
it upgraded m
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 05:30:34PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> test10 and test11 both worked fine for me in my tests. I've heard some
> reports of file system problems with test11 so I'm running test10.
test 11 has been working fine for me, even under heavy load (mail exploder
where the load
We use 2 mainly, the Lucent Portmaster 3 and Cisco AS5200. We have had one
PM fail and one 10 modem card in another fail. As far as Cisco, have never
had a hardware fault. Cisco has a more complicated setup and config,
whereas pm's are simple but the Cisco provides far more diagnostics with
the
could you guide regarding the access server.
how to use it , which is best etc...
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
On 2000-12-07 11:05, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>> If you know what you are doing and are capable of properly testing a
>> kernel then use 2.4.0-test10 with Devfs. It'll make things easier for you
>> in the
>
>test10 fails miserably with my hardware ( they detect that my hd is udma66
>but then fail
test
please ignore
sorry :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If you know what you are doing and are capable of properly testing a kernel
> then use 2.4.0-test10 with Devfs. It'll make things easier for you in the
test10 fails miserably with my hardware ( they detect that my hd is udma66
but then fail to use it), test11 worked nice with my other machin
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 06:26:50PM +0100, Guido Bozzetto wrote:
> >
> > Qmail is, by default, sending double-bounces to postmaster@server if the
>email-address at @server is incorrect and the address is invalid.
> >
> > Is there any way to disable double bounces for certain domains?
> >
> wit
10 matches
Mail list logo
