On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:03:45AM -0500, Eirik Dentz wrote:
| I also posted the following to the Debian Users mailing list:
|
| I have a virtual host configured under Apache 1.3.14 with SUEXEC support
| enabled. My CGI/Perl scripts run as the USER/GROUP specified in the Virtual
| Host directive
Hey people, need urgent help
trying to install debian on 3 of our
sparcserver10's here, and the installation part is fine
but when it goes to reboot, it wont boot, comes up
with error at a certain byte of the hdd
but if i change the hard disk parititoning byte
changes, leading me to bele
Eirik Dentz wrote:
>
> Nonetheless it leaves me very curious as to why the PHP
> module is built this way.
I guess it is just the way apache works.
Having something (anything) as a module means having the code in apache
itself. Every httpd child process has the code in it.
When you run a CGI, t
Thanks for the response. Thanks for the info regarding the
PHP-LIB developer's set up.
Nonetheless it leaves me very curious as to why the PHP
module is built this way. I'm wondering if there are
functions in the PHP module that would leave security holes
in the suexec wrapper? I don't suppose
Eirik Dentz wrote:
>
> I have a virtual host configured under Apache 1.3.14 with SUEXEC support
> enabled. My CGI/Perl scripts run as the USER/GROUP specified in the Virtual
> Host directive in my httpd.conf file as they should, but for some reason my
> PHP4 scripts don't. Rather they are runni
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> > He now can use fetchmail to get the mails, and fetchmail will deliver
> > it to localhost:25, no matter what´s in From, To, Cc, whereever.
>
> Bcc: ? Mailing lists ? I repeat: it cannot work.
Delivered-To: -
That _will_ cover lists, bcc and everything because
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:03:45AM -0500, Eirik Dentz wrote:
| I also posted the following to the Debian Users mailing list:
|
| I have a virtual host configured under Apache 1.3.14 with SUEXEC support
| enabled. My CGI/Perl scripts run as the USER/GROUP specified in the Virtual
| Host directive
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:49:34PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:41:23PM +0100, Martin Man wrote:
>
> > P.S. or if someone knows simple ruleset for procmail ??
>
> :0 c
>
this is obviously possible, but then I've to trow the email at the end into
/dev/null, because I d
tps> ... As part of
tps> the traffic going through the box, some streams have 1000k
tps> window size for a certain reason. ...
This is the TCP window? Are you sure both sides can use the window
scale option?
[...]
tps> PS: This is really something to do with the window size an
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001 11:44:57 +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes:
>On Wednesday 3 January 2001, at 15 h 29, the keyboard of Robert Waldner
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Uh, why? As far as I understood, Martin has _one_ POP-account
>> (domain-in-a-box this feature is called by us) with his ISP.
On Wednesday 3 January 2001, at 15 h 29, the keyboard of Robert Waldner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Uh, why? As far as I understood, Martin has _one_ POP-account
> (domain-in-a-box this feature is called by us) with his ISP.
Yes. This is what cannot works (despite what ISPs say).
> He now
11 matches
Mail list logo
