>It may be easier for you to show us parts of your directory layout and
>parts of your named.conf.
>
>For example: if your chroot environment is /var/named, then do you have
>a
>a /var/named/usr/sbin/named-xfer executable?
> Jeremy C. Reed
I am not at my box now so i can't send you my config to
--- "Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>It may be easier for you to show us parts of your directory layout and
>parts of your named.conf.
>
>For example: if your chroot environment is /var/named, then do you have a
>a /var/named/usr/sbin/named-xfer executable?
>
> Jeremy C. Reed
>
You may want to try running VNC:
http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/
It is basically a "remote desktop" application, so you connect to the VNC
server,
you see the (in this case) Win95 desktop, you choose Start|Shutdown...
Note, though, that if you have applications running that fail to shut dow
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 09:24:56PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 101 12:28:54 -0500 (EST), Allen Ahoffman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >can someone tell me how to secure a network so that:
> >the router won't route traffic if the specific mac address isn't
> >registered before hand?
>
You may want to try running VNC:
http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/
It is basically a "remote desktop" application, so you connect to the VNC server,
you see the (in this case) Win95 desktop, you choose Start|Shutdown...
Note, though, that if you have applications running that fail to shut dow
On Fri, 16 Mar 101 12:28:54 -0500 (EST), Allen Ahoffman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>can someone tell me how to secure a network so that:
>the router won't route traffic if the specific mac address isn't
>registered before hand?
Kernel 2.4 netfilter can make routing decisions depending on the MAC
a
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 12:27:16PM -0700, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
>
> Back in the 2.0.XX days of the kernel, i used to add virtual hosts in the
> following fashion, and it worked beautiful. I could even add hosts out of
> a diff subnet then the primary interface.
>
> It would take and s
Back in the 2.0.XX days of the kernel, i used to add virtual hosts in the
following fashion, and it worked beautiful. I could even add hosts out of
a diff subnet then the primary interface.
It would take and send traffic out on the same virtual interface it came
in on. Somehow, between 2.0.XX and
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 09:24:56PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 101 12:28:54 -0500 (EST), Allen Ahoffman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >can someone tell me how to secure a network so that:
> >the router won't route traffic if the specific mac address isn't
> >registered before hand?
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 12:28:54PM -0500, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
> can someone tell me how to secure a network so that:
> the router won't route traffic if the specific mac address isn't
> registered before hand?
> it would keep people in line.
> better, a table with mac addresses and ip(s) (its alr
On Fri, 16 Mar 101 12:28:54 -0500 (EST), Allen Ahoffman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>can someone tell me how to secure a network so that:
>the router won't route traffic if the specific mac address isn't
>registered before hand?
Kernel 2.4 netfilter can make routing decisions depending on the MAC
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 12:27:16PM -0700, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
>
> Back in the 2.0.XX days of the kernel, i used to add virtual hosts in the
> following fashion, and it worked beautiful. I could even add hosts out of
> a diff subnet then the primary interface.
>
> It would take and
Well, you could buy a managed switch from HP or Cisco. :-)
Personally, I have no idea how to do this sort of thing with Linux; but
it's probably better to do it at the backbone with a reliable switch than
to throw in extra servers with multiple network cards all over the place
(which would incre
Przemyslaw Wegrzyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16 Mar 2001, at
10:17:
On 15 Mar 2001, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is there a distribution that will cheaply replace a load
balancer?
> > e.g. for web servers. LVS, ...?
>
> man ipmasqadm ... you'll see this:
Back in the 2.0.XX days of the kernel, i used to add virtual hosts in the
following fashion, and it worked beautiful. I could even add hosts out of
a diff subnet then the primary interface.
It would take and send traffic out on the same virtual interface it came
in on. Somehow, between 2.0.XX an
can someone tell me how to secure a network so that:
the router won't route traffic if the specific mac address isn't
registered before hand?
it would keep people in line.
better, a table with mac addresses and ip(s) (its already there), but have
it authenticated so you can't just bring up an ip wi
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Simon Tennant wrote:
> I run arpwatch. It watches for new arp requests and mails me the
> following:
>
> Subject: new station (w192.z064003150.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net)
>Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 16:49:59 -0800
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arpwatch)
>
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 12:28:54PM -0500, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
> can someone tell me how to secure a network so that:
> the router won't route traffic if the specific mac address isn't
> registered before hand?
> it would keep people in line.
> better, a table with mac addresses and ip(s) (its al
I run arpwatch. It watches for new arp requests and mails me the
following:
Subject: new station (w192.z064003150.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 16:49:59 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arpwatch)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hostname: w1
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Joachim Schiele wrote:
> is there a possibility to record the mac address of the networkcards
ifconfig shows the mac address (HWaddr).
> i need this because i don't want the clients being able to spoof the proxy
> requests to the firewall. i want them to be the only coputer
is there a possibility to record the mac address of the networkcards
i need this because i don't want the clients being able to spoof the proxy
requests to the firewall. i want them to be the only coputer who is able to
make requests to the firewall
pool(20 computers) -> proxy(linux) -> firewall
Well, you could buy a managed switch from HP or Cisco. :-)
Personally, I have no idea how to do this sort of thing with Linux; but
it's probably better to do it at the backbone with a reliable switch than
to throw in extra servers with multiple network cards all over the place
(which would inc
>Przemyslaw Wegrzyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16 Mar 2001, at
>10:17:
>> On 15 Mar 2001, Fraser Campbell wrote:
>> > Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > > Is there a distribution that will cheaply replace a load
>balancer?
>> > > e.g. for web servers. LVS, ...?
>> >
>> > man ipmasqadm
can someone tell me how to secure a network so that:
the router won't route traffic if the specific mac address isn't
registered before hand?
it would keep people in line.
better, a table with mac addresses and ip(s) (its already there), but have
it authenticated so you can't just bring up an ip w
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, [iso-8859-2] Jakub Ambro¿ewicz wrote:
> That's the message in my logs. I chrooted bind and no matter what will i do
> it's always the same. I tried to set named-xfer path in named.conf but it
It may be easier for you to show us parts of your directory layout and
parts of your
does anyone have good/bad comments about loading Debian on a tyan s2510ng
motherboard?
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Simon Tennant wrote:
> I run arpwatch. It watches for new arp requests and mails me the
> following:
>
> Subject: new station (w192.z064003150.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net)
>Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 16:49:59 -0800
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arpwatch)
>
I run arpwatch. It watches for new arp requests and mails me the
following:
Subject: new station (w192.z064003150.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 16:49:59 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arpwatch)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hostname: w
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Joachim Schiele wrote:
> is there a possibility to record the mac address of the networkcards
ifconfig shows the mac address (HWaddr).
> i need this because i don't want the clients being able to spoof the proxy
> requests to the firewall. i want them to be the only copute
is there a possibility to record the mac address of the networkcards
i need this because i don't want the clients being able to spoof the proxy
requests to the firewall. i want them to be the only coputer who is able to
make requests to the firewall
pool(20 computers) -> proxy(linux) -> firewal
That's the message in my logs. I chrooted bind and no matter what will i do
it's always the same. I tried to set named-xfer path in named.conf but it
doesn't change anything. Of course the file is there and has rx attribute
for all as all directories. In act of despair i copied named-xfer executabl
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, [iso-8859-2] Jakub Ambro¿ewicz wrote:
> That's the message in my logs. I chrooted bind and no matter what will i do
> it's always the same. I tried to set named-xfer path in named.conf but it
It may be easier for you to show us parts of your directory layout and
parts of you
does anyone have good/bad comments about loading Debian on a tyan s2510ng
motherboard?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's the message in my logs. I chrooted bind and no matter what will i do
it's always the same. I tried to set named-xfer path in named.conf but it
doesn't change anything. Of course the file is there and has rx attribute
for all as all directories. In act of despair i copied named-xfer executab
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:34:45 +0100 (MET)
From: DI Peter Burgstaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Marcel Hicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: load balancer
> > :)) And what about sessions ?
>
> As session data is usually stored in a database,
> have the
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Marcel Hicking wrote:
> Przemyslaw Wegrzyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16 Mar 2001, at
> 10:17:
> > On 15 Mar 2001, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> > > Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Is there a distribution that will cheaply replace a load
> balancer?
> > > > e.g. for
Przemyslaw Wegrzyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16 Mar 2001, at
10:17:
> On 15 Mar 2001, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> > Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Is there a distribution that will cheaply replace a load
balancer?
> > > e.g. for web servers. LVS, ...?
> >
> > man ipmasqadm ... you'll se
> Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is there a distribution that will cheaply replace a load balancer?
> > e.g.
> > for web servers.
> > LVS, ...?
I'm also currently evaluating load balancers with linux and am running a
Piranha (ha.redhat.com) system very successfully at present.
On 15 Mar 2001, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is there a distribution that will cheaply replace a load balancer?
> > e.g.
> > for web servers.
> > LVS, ...?
>
> man ipmasqadm ... you'll see this:
>
>Redirect all web traffic to internals ho
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:34:45 +0100 (MET)
From: DI Peter Burgstaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Marcel Hicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: load balancer
> > :)) And what about sessions ?
>
> As session data is usually stored in a database,
> have the
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Marcel Hicking wrote:
> Przemyslaw Wegrzyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16 Mar 2001, at
> 10:17:
> > On 15 Mar 2001, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> > > Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Is there a distribution that will cheaply replace a load
> balancer?
> > > > e.g. fo
Przemyslaw Wegrzyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16 Mar 2001, at
10:17:
> On 15 Mar 2001, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> > Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Is there a distribution that will cheaply replace a load
balancer?
> > > e.g. for web servers. LVS, ...?
> >
> > man ipmasqadm ... you'll s
> Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is there a distribution that will cheaply replace a load balancer?
> > e.g.
> > for web servers.
> > LVS, ...?
I'm also currently evaluating load balancers with linux and am running a
Piranha (ha.redhat.com) system very successfully at present
On 15 Mar 2001, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is there a distribution that will cheaply replace a load balancer?
> > e.g.
> > for web servers.
> > LVS, ...?
>
> man ipmasqadm ... you'll see this:
>
>Redirect all web traffic to internals h
44 matches
Mail list logo
