Hello all,
Can anyone tell me how (or even if it is possible) to mount a Sun UFS
drive (SunOS 5.5.1) under Linux (2.2.19) as read-write? I have tried
mount -w -t ufs -o ufstype=sun /dev/sda1 /mnt/scsi
but it mounts read only. The drive is in the localhost and I am booting
off a Linux floppy.
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 04:33:27PM -0400, Haim Dimermanas wrote:
Hi Debian ISP,
After the thread we had a couple of weeks ago, I decided to give
postfix a shot. I installed postfix from deb (using 0.0.19991231pl11-1).
It didn't work at first because of my iptables rules on the box. I
Back to questioning:
recently i did some calculation and find out that webalizer results are
about about 85% of the net-acct results.
Ist that an realistic overhead form http-headers, ICMP (on or to port 80?),
and TCP/IP frame info, etc.?
Yes. But it depends upon the kind of data served.
I am not running anything listening on port 25, 'fuser -v 25/tcp'
doesn't show anything. If I try telneting on port 25 I get a connection
refused. I don't know what is going on. Help anyone ...
Edit /etc/inetd.conf and comment out the smtp line.
/etc/init.d/inetd reload reloads the
The header size is not so fixed, actually. If you use cookies on your site
the client will send them to you upon each request. You might have CGIs and
such that update cookies frequently as well, which would reduce your
efficiency yet more. There are a lot of factors here, but the real issue
On Monday 07 May 2001 18:17, Haim Dimermanas wrote:
Anbody knows what is loggend in the Apache log in the field size (i.e.
included HTTP Header or not) , and what does net-acct take for the size
of a packet (just the payload, or the headers too?)
From the Apache docs @
hi,
Not only will it not report the size of the http headers, but it won't
report
the TCP and IP frame information and any ICMP messages that may be
required.
What is the problem with automatically sucking the sizes out of webalizer
files and reporting them in some other format?
the answer
Hi Debian ISP,
After the thread we had a couple of weeks ago, I decided to give
postfix a shot. I installed postfix from deb (using 0.0.19991231pl11-1).
It didn't work at first because of my iptables rules on the box. I
fixed them and then I get this error when I run postfix start :
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 04:33:27PM -0400, Haim Dimermanas wrote:
Hi Debian ISP,
After the thread we had a couple of weeks ago, I decided to give
postfix a shot. I installed postfix from deb (using 0.0.19991231pl11-1).
It didn't work at first because of my iptables rules on the box. I
Back to questioning:
recently i did some calculation and find out that webalizer results are
about about 85% of the net-acct results.
Ist that an realistic overhead form http-headers, ICMP (on or to port 80?),
and TCP/IP frame info, etc.?
Yes. But it depends upon the kind of data served. The
I am not running anything listening on port 25, 'fuser -v 25/tcp'
doesn't show anything. If I try telneting on port 25 I get a connection
refused. I don't know what is going on. Help anyone ...
Edit /etc/inetd.conf and comment out the smtp line.
/etc/init.d/inetd reload reloads the
The header size is not so fixed, actually. If you use cookies on your site
the client will send them to you upon each request. You might have CGIs and
such that update cookies frequently as well, which would reduce your
efficiency yet more. There are a lot of factors here, but the real issue is
12 matches
Mail list logo
