If the nodes in question are plugged into a switch with managment
capabilities then you could set the security of the port to only allow
legal mac/ip address's. It depends on the switch.
You could go to the person and whack them on the head. Which might be the
easiest.
Chris
At 06:12 PM 6/29
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, anon wrote:
> my problem is that some local users are changing their own local ip numbers
> (like, 192.168.1.40 to 192.168.1.50) then bypassing the Traffic shaper
> bandwidth limitation. (that was set on 192.168.1.40)
>
> anyone know how can i prevent this ?
This first that
I've been asked to set up a MLM along side a web server and I wanted to ask
a quick question to the experienced, before I put a lot of time into setting
this up.
My situation: I'm responsible for an web server that has sendmail installed
and is configured to send email via Perl and PHP scripts, bu
If the nodes in question are plugged into a switch with managment
capabilities then you could set the security of the port to only allow
legal mac/ip address's. It depends on the switch.
You could go to the person and whack them on the head. Which might be the
easiest.
Chris
At 06:12 PM 6
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, anon wrote:
> my problem is that some local users are changing their own local ip numbers
> (like, 192.168.1.40 to 192.168.1.50) then bypassing the Traffic shaper
> bandwidth limitation. (that was set on 192.168.1.40)
>
> anyone know how can i prevent this ?
This first tha
hello all, this is my first post.
my problem is that some local users are changing their own local ip numbers
(like, 192.168.1.40 to 192.168.1.50) then bypassing the Traffic shaper
bandwidth limitation. (that was set on 192.168.1.40)
anyone know how can i prevent this ?
thanks in advance
hello all, this is my first post.
my problem is that some local users are changing their own local ip numbers
(like, 192.168.1.40 to 192.168.1.50) then bypassing the Traffic shaper
bandwidth limitation. (that was set on 192.168.1.40)
anyone know how can i prevent this ?
thanks in advance
I've been asked to set up a MLM along side a web server and I wanted to ask
a quick question to the experienced, before I put a lot of time into setting
this up.
My situation: I'm responsible for an web server that has sendmail installed
and is configured to send email via Perl and PHP scripts, b
hello all, this is my first post.
my problem is that some local users are changing their own local ip numbers
(like, 192.168.1.40 to 192.168.1.50) then bypassing the Traffic shaper
bandwidth limitation. (that was set on 192.168.1.40)
anyone know how can i prevent this ?
thanks in advance
-
hello all, this is my first post.
my problem is that some local users are changing their own local ip numbers
(like, 192.168.1.40 to 192.168.1.50) then bypassing the Traffic shaper
bandwidth limitation. (that was set on 192.168.1.40)
anyone know how can i prevent this ?
thanks in advance
--
Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
Hello !
I have noticed the following lines in Apache's error.log:
[Fri Jun 29 17:35:41 2001] [notice] child pid 18786 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Jun 29 17:35:54 2001] [notice] child pid 20229 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
I've experienced the same pro
> PHP4 has recently got a php4-sybase module, so is ther a chance
> a perl counterpart dbd-sybase package in sid/woody?
> This driver would also enable access to MS SQL Servers, I guess.
> The answer to the question "Can I access my M$ server with Perl?"
> could be turned from plain "no" to a "Shou
Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
Hello !
I have noticed the following lines in Apache's error.log:
[Fri Jun 29 17:35:41 2001] [notice] child pid 18786 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Jun 29 17:35:54 2001] [notice] child pid 20229 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
I've experienced the same pro
> PHP4 has recently got a php4-sybase module, so is ther a chance
> a perl counterpart dbd-sybase package in sid/woody?
> This driver would also enable access to MS SQL Servers, I guess.
> The answer to the question "Can I access my M$ server with Perl?"
> could be turned from plain "no" to a "Sho
Hey Haim,
Friday, June 29, 2001, 1:13:42 PM, you wrote:
HD> Kevin,
HD> AFAIK, you can use PAM directly from Postfix without having to go through
HD> SASL. The book fro R. Blum fails to mention it.
HD> Haim.
Umm . . . how? And still, that doesn't fix this odd behaviour :-/
Btw, I do
Kevin,
AFAIK, you can use PAM directly from Postfix without having to go through
SASL. The book fro R. Blum fails to mention it.
Haim.
"Kevin J. Menard, Jr." wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> Anyone here have all this working together? I apt-get'ed the source for
> postfix and altered
Hey guys,
Anyone here have all this working together? I apt-get'ed the source for
postfix and altered the debian/rules file to add SASL support for SMTP auth.
The build went fine, but it apparently always tries to use the sasldb, even
though I set up my /usr/lib/sasl/smtpd.conf fi
Hello !
I have noticed the following lines in Apache's error.log:
[Fri Jun 29 17:35:41 2001] [notice] child pid 18786 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Jun 29 17:35:54 2001] [notice] child pid 20229 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
I've strace'd Apache - the child processes dies after
> smbclient //server/share -U user%password -c "cd location\of\data;mget *"
>
> Then is says :
>
> Get file file1.txt?
>
> and this will then stop it from working in a script that is a cronjob. Any
> ideas on how I can get
> it to just get the files and not ask anything?
>
From man smbclie
Marcin,
I just tested that out and you are right. There is a prompt in smbclient!
Cool.
Greg
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:01:53PM +0100, Friedrich wrote:
> >
> > smbclient //server/share -U user%password -c "cd location\of\data;mget *"
> >
> > Then is
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:01:53PM +0100, Friedrich wrote:
>
> smbclient //server/share -U user%password -c "cd location\of\data;mget *"
>
> Then is says :
>
> Get file file1.txt?
>
> and this will then stop it from working in a script that is a cronjob. Any
> ideas on how I can get
> it to j
You could use smbmount //smb_name/share mountpoint -o username=<>,
password=<> ...
Of course if you don't have root access or smbmount isn't suid then this
method won't work.
Greg
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Friedrich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wish to use smbclient to backup some windows shares onto a Linux
Hi,
I wish to use smbclient to backup some windows shares onto a Linux box. Now
this will be run in a
script so I sould like to have it not prompt for anything. So far I can get it
to retrieve a single
file without prompting with this command :
smbclient //server/share -U user%password -c "cd
Hey Haim,
Friday, June 29, 2001, 1:13:42 PM, you wrote:
HD> Kevin,
HD> AFAIK, you can use PAM directly from Postfix without having to go through
HD> SASL. The book fro R. Blum fails to mention it.
HD> Haim.
Umm . . . how? And still, that doesn't fix this odd behaviour :-/
Btw, I d
Kevin,
AFAIK, you can use PAM directly from Postfix without having to go through
SASL. The book fro R. Blum fails to mention it.
Haim.
"Kevin J. Menard, Jr." wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> Anyone here have all this working together? I apt-get'ed the source for
> postfix and altere
Hey guys,
Anyone here have all this working together? I apt-get'ed the source for
postfix and altered the debian/rules file to add SASL support for SMTP auth.
The build went fine, but it apparently always tries to use the sasldb, even
though I set up my /usr/lib/sasl/smtpd.conf f
Hello !
I have noticed the following lines in Apache's error.log:
[Fri Jun 29 17:35:41 2001] [notice] child pid 18786 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Jun 29 17:35:54 2001] [notice] child pid 20229 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
I've strace'd Apache - the child processes dies afte
> smbclient //server/share -U user%password -c "cd location\of\data;mget *"
>
> Then is says :
>
> Get file file1.txt?
>
> and this will then stop it from working in a script that is a cronjob. Any ideas on
>how I can get
> it to just get the files and not ask anything?
>
From man smbclie
Marcin,
I just tested that out and you are right. There is a prompt in smbclient!
Cool.
Greg
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:01:53PM +0100, Friedrich wrote:
> >
> > smbclient //server/share -U user%password -c "cd location\of\data;mget *"
> >
> > Then i
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:01:53PM +0100, Friedrich wrote:
>
> smbclient //server/share -U user%password -c "cd location\of\data;mget *"
>
> Then is says :
>
> Get file file1.txt?
>
> and this will then stop it from working in a script that is a cronjob. Any ideas on
>how I can get
> it to j
You could use smbmount //smb_name/share mountpoint -o username=<>,
password=<> ...
Of course if you don't have root access or smbmount isn't suid then this
method won't work.
Greg
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Friedrich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wish to use smbclient to backup some windows shares onto a Linux
Hi,
I wish to use smbclient to backup some windows shares onto a Linux box. Now this will
be run in a
script so I sould like to have it not prompt for anything. So far I can get it to
retrieve a single
file without prompting with this command :
smbclient //server/share -U user%password -c "c
NB> I see that by default the files in /etc/postfix are owner: group
NB> root:root. This obviously doesn't lend itself to the contents thereof
NB> being admin'ed by admins who don't otherwise enjoy the total freedom of
NB> the system (nor is it best for those of us who like to spend as little
NB>
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 05:07:46PM +1000, Neale Banks wrote:
> * use sudo -or- super to allow postfix admins to do what is necessary.
>
> What do people see as the relative merits of these?
>
> What are the differences between sudo and super in these kind of
> circumstances?
i use sudo. it's eas
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:10:24AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There is a problem with Postfix:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> the email arrive,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> the email doesn't arrive
http://www.postfix.org/basic.html#mydestination
You need to put the domain in mydest
Hi,
There is a problem with Postfix:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the email arrive,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the email doesn't arrive
[DNS: MX points the host.domain]
Thanks in advance for any comment
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 03:24:06PM -0500, Haim Dimermanas wrote:
> I need to do email hosting for a large number of domains. My solution
> consists in Postfix for the MTA, Cyrus for the LDA and IMP for the MUA.
> Emails have to be accessible by POP as well.
If you don't mind the fact that it is
NB> I see that by default the files in /etc/postfix are owner: group
NB> root:root. This obviously doesn't lend itself to the contents thereof
NB> being admin'ed by admins who don't otherwise enjoy the total freedom of
NB> the system (nor is it best for those of us who like to spend as little
NB
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 05:07:46PM +1000, Neale Banks wrote:
> * use sudo -or- super to allow postfix admins to do what is necessary.
>
> What do people see as the relative merits of these?
>
> What are the differences between sudo and super in these kind of
> circumstances?
i use sudo. it's ea
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:10:24AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There is a problem with Postfix:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> the email arrive,
>
> user@domain
>
> the email doesn't arrive
http://www.postfix.org/basic.html#mydestination
You need to put the domain in mydestinati
Hi,
There is a problem with Postfix:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the email arrive,
user@domain
the email doesn't arrive
[DNS: MX points the host.domain]
Thanks in advance for any comment
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Greetings all,
With particular relevance to potato...
I see that by default the files in /etc/postfix are owner: group
root:root. This obviously doesn't lend itself to the contents thereof
being admin'ed by admins who don't otherwise enjoy the total freedom of
the system (nor is it best for thos
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 03:24:06PM -0500, Haim Dimermanas wrote:
> I need to do email hosting for a large number of domains. My solution
> consists in Postfix for the MTA, Cyrus for the LDA and IMP for the MUA.
> Emails have to be accessible by POP as well.
If you don't mind the fact that it is
43 matches
Mail list logo
