On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 12:07:28PM +0100, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 06:23:19AM +0200, Maurice Verhagen wrote:
This first that pops into mind is use DHCP and give a IP-lease to the
machines in your local network based on the NIC's Mac address. I
guess the only way out
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:30:33 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sami Haahtinen) wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 12:07:28PM +0100, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
Besides, the bad guys may choose not to use DHCP - this is
entirely up to the config on the client machines.
but if you make dynamic firewall
RC It is definately possible. It makes sense to me, this is what
RC MX records were designed for!
I agree but, this is also what name server delegation is designed for!
And this is THE way to go in your case.
Let's say you put the mailing list software on the web server. The
I have been reading this thread and noticed no one has suggested the MAC
address filtering capabilities in Linux 2.4's new ip tables subsystem. I
hear there are serious problems with using 2.4.x series kernels as a
firewall, though; what are they?
- jsw
-Original Message-
From: Gerard
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
I use Apache 1.3.19 + php4.0.5 from Woody in chrooted enviroment.
My problem is actually I can't force Apache to drop core files.
I've added ulimit -c unlimited to /etc/init.d/apache, and set
CoreDumpDirectory to some world writeable dir.
I have been reading this thread and noticed no one has suggested the MAC
address filtering capabilities in Linux 2.4's new ip tables subsystem. I
hear there are serious problems with using 2.4.x series kernels as a
firewall, though; what are they?
I believe the 2.4.x iptable issues were
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 06:23:19AM +0200, Maurice Verhagen wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, anon wrote:
my problem is that some local users are changing their own local ip numbers
(like, 192.168.1.40 to 192.168.1.50) then bypassing the Traffic shaper
bandwidth limitation. (that was set on
My first choice is also what the other Chris said, use a large LART on the
offending [computer|user]. You can use smart switches to base the ip on
pre-authorized MAC addresses. That way you are effectivly shaping based on
MAC address. But in true hacker form, even that can be overcome. Some
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 12:07:28PM +0100, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 06:23:19AM +0200, Maurice Verhagen wrote:
This first that pops into mind is use DHCP and give a IP-lease to the
machines in your local network based on the NIC's Mac address. I
guess the only way out
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:30:33 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sami Haahtinen) wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 12:07:28PM +0100, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
Besides, the bad guys may choose not to use DHCP - this is
entirely up to the config on the client machines.
but if you make dynamic firewall
RC It is definately possible. It makes sense to me, this is what
RC MX records were designed for!
I agree but, this is also what name server delegation is designed for!
And this is THE way to go in your case.
Let's say you put the mailing list software on the web server. The CPU
Hello all,
I'm working on a problem that seems like it should work and am looking for
some help knocking out any obvious problems.
We currently have several DSL lines that are used for crawling websites.
Bandwidth as it is is pretty cheap via DSL (we have 6 7Mbit lines for much
less than an
I have been reading this thread and noticed no one has suggested the MAC
address filtering capabilities in Linux 2.4's new ip tables subsystem. I
hear there are serious problems with using 2.4.x series kernels as a
firewall, though; what are they?
- jsw
-Original Message-
From: Gerard
I have been reading this thread and noticed no one has suggested the MAC
address filtering capabilities in Linux 2.4's new ip tables subsystem. I
hear there are serious problems with using 2.4.x series kernels as a
firewall, though; what are they?
I believe the 2.4.x iptable issues were
14 matches
Mail list logo
