Apparently, on Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 02:46:46PM +1100, Andrew Tait wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have been considering upgrading our servers from the 2.2.x kernel up to
> the 2.4 (we have 1 server running testing/woody, soon to be 2). However, one
> thing I want in a new kernel is transparent proxying, wh
After looking into this more I can see that it is my ldap configuration.
I am using slapd.
When I do a dpk-reconfigure libpam-ldap and I set the root login =
cn=admin, dc=< ?? > What do I put for dc?
If I am using debian.org as my ldap server location would I have
cn=admin, dc=debian, dc=com?
I
Apparently, on Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 02:46:46PM +1100, Andrew Tait wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have been considering upgrading our servers from the 2.2.x kernel up to
> the 2.4 (we have 1 server running testing/woody, soon to be 2). However, one
> thing I want in a new kernel is transparent proxying, w
Hi,
The problem with it connecting and installing the database works good
now, but it cannot connect to the ldap server? What is going on, would
it be due to a config problem, or is it the package?
Thanks,
Matt
Setting up sourceforge (2.5-14) ...
You'll see some debugging info during this install
After looking into this more I can see that it is my ldap configuration.
I am using slapd.
When I do a dpk-reconfigure libpam-ldap and I set the root login =
cn=admin, dc=< ?? > What do I put for dc?
If I am using debian.org as my ldap server location would I have
cn=admin, dc=debian, dc=com?
Hi,
The problem with it connecting and installing the database works good
now, but it cannot connect to the ldap server? What is going on, would
it be due to a config problem, or is it the package?
Thanks,
Matt
Setting up sourceforge (2.5-14) ...
You'll see some debugging info during this instal
Hi
> afaik, webalizer has no out-of-box facility for doing a summarized
> report. I thought you needed per site stats.
> Now, i also wouldnt be surprised if you COULD do it with weblizerfor
> example, if you report all vhosts to a single log file, webalizer would
> give you a global hit co
Hi
> afaik, webalizer has no out-of-box facility for doing a summarized
> report. I thought you needed per site stats.
> Now, i also wouldnt be surprised if you COULD do it with weblizerfor
> example, if you report all vhosts to a single log file, webalizer would
> give you a global hit c
Nick Jennings wrote:
This brings up a question I have. Isn't testing technically the *last*
of stable/testing/unstable to get security fixes?
Correct.
security fixes for stable are packported immediately, and the fixes are
also incorporated into unstable asap. Now for testing, there would be
a
9 matches
Mail list logo
