Hello Ted,
Your mail is very informative to me.
I wonder how to define cmd to run automatically in authorized_hosts?
I thought there's nothing but pub keys in authorized_hosts file.
And, do I need ssh-agent in this case? Do I need to leave passphrase
blank?
Thank you for your patience and
quote who=Patrick Hsieh
OK. My problem is, if I use rsync+ssh with blank passphrase among servers
to automate rsync+ssh backup procedure without password prompt, then the
cracker will not need to send any password as well as passphrase when ssh
login onto another server, right?
No, password
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 20:53:03 +0100, Russell Coker writes:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 15:28, Russell Coker wrote:
Every time I post here I get a response that looks like a bounce in a
strange language from naver-mailer. Here's the headers:
Here's my solution to the naver-mailer problem:
ipchains
Hello All
I am not sure that I understand what the original poster wishes to
achieve, nor have I followed the lengthy discussions that ensued.
But, a thread with the above subject line would not be complete
without a mention of mirrordir.
Someone wrote:
Sigh... and I was hoping for a
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 03:35:43PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
OK. My problem is, if I use rsync+ssh with blank passphrase among
servers to automate rsync+ssh backup procedure without password prompt,
then the cracker will not need to send any password as well as
passphrase when ssh login
ssh-agent does help here. Have the cron job which is doing the backup
look to see if there's an ssh agent running as its user (presumably
'backup', maybe root) and if not send mail to somebody's pager,
complaining about the missing agent. If the agent is running, the
cron job can reconnect to
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:19:11AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Automation with keys stored on machines is better than doing it manually
and forgetting to back up. :-)
Agreed. Like excercise, the kind you do is better than the kind you
don't.
It **does** provide a path by which someone
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 10:17:38AM -0800, Ted Deppner wrote:
The [modules] in rsyncd.conf provide a nice way to package what you want to
back up. You can also specify what ip addresses connect to rsyncd. So in
theory only the backup machine can connect to the rsyncd daemons; we've set
I have a customer who wants to host his own email server, and he wants
to have long email addresses, like firstname.lastname@domain.com ,
and map it to a local name that is less than 8 chars. What is the best
email server to do this kind of mapping?
-chris zubrzycki
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 02:28:28PM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
Hi all,
What do you think would be the best way to duplicate a HD to another
(similar sized) HD?
I've been using tar on my system. Works excellent. no downtime, and all
permissions are maintained.
--
Nick Jennings
--
To
[cc: trimed to something a little more sane]
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 04:21:33PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're pulling **from** a read-only rsyncd. It has to run as root because we
require the right archive, permissions, etc I'm confused; is that much
different from running an
sendmail! :)
j.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Zubrzycki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 4:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: long email names
I have a customer who wants to host his own email server, and he wants
to have long email addresses, like
Subject: long email names
I have a customer who wants to host his own email server, and he wants
to have long email addresses, like firstname.lastname@domain.com ,
and map it to a local name that is less than 8 chars. What is the best
email server to do this kind of mapping?
-chris
quote who=Chris Zubrzycki
I have a customer who wants to host his own email server, and he wants
to have long email addresses, like firstname.lastname@domain.com ,
and map it to a local name that is less than 8 chars.
This is a sensible request...
What is the best email server to do this
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 03:23:01PM +0200, George Karaolides wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Craig Sanders wrote:
someday soon, someone's going to take the good ideas from djbdns,
combine it with the good stuff from bind (including backwards
compatibility with bind config zonefile formats), add
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 12:52:23AM -0500, P Prince wrote:
there are two major problems with all of bernstein's software. the
first is that it requires you to throw away your existing
configuration...no big deal for a caching only name-server or if you
only have one or two domains to
Hello,
I am sorry I could be kind of off-topic. But I want to know how to
cross-site rsync without authentication, say ssh auth.,?
I've read some doc. using ssh-keygen to generate key pairs, appending
the public keys to ~/.ssh/authorized_hosts on another host to prevent
ssh authentication
quote who=Patrick Hsieh
I am sorry I could be kind of off-topic. But I want to know how to
cross-site rsync without authentication, say ssh auth.,?
That's the best way.
I've read some doc. using ssh-keygen to generate key pairs, appending the
public keys to ~/.ssh/authorized_hosts on
OK. My problem is, if I use rsync+ssh with blank passphrase among
servers to automate rsync+ssh backup procedure without password prompt,
then the cracker will not need to send any password as well as
passphrase when ssh login onto another server, right?
Is there a good way to automate rsync+ssh
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 03:15:20PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
I've read some doc. using ssh-keygen to generate key pairs, appending
the public keys to ~/.ssh/authorized_hosts on another host to prevent
ssh authentication prompt. Is it very risky? Chances are a cracker could
compromise one
Hello Ted,
Your mail is very informative to me.
I wonder how to define cmd to run automatically in authorized_hosts?
I thought there's nothing but pub keys in authorized_hosts file.
And, do I need ssh-agent in this case? Do I need to leave passphrase
blank?
Thank you for your patience and
quote who=Patrick Hsieh
OK. My problem is, if I use rsync+ssh with blank passphrase among servers
to automate rsync+ssh backup procedure without password prompt, then the
cracker will not need to send any password as well as passphrase when ssh
login onto another server, right?
No, password
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 20:53:03 +0100, Russell Coker writes:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 15:28, Russell Coker wrote:
Every time I post here I get a response that looks like a bounce in a
strange language from naver-mailer. Here's the headers:
Here's my solution to the naver-mailer problem:
ipchains
Hello All
I am not sure that I understand what the original poster wishes to
achieve, nor have I followed the lengthy discussions that ensued.
But, a thread with the above subject line would not be complete
without a mention of mirrordir.
Someone wrote:
Sigh... and I was hoping for a
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 03:35:43PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
OK. My problem is, if I use rsync+ssh with blank passphrase among
servers to automate rsync+ssh backup procedure without password prompt,
then the cracker will not need to send any password as well as
passphrase when ssh login onto
ssh-agent does help here. Have the cron job which is doing the backup
look to see if there's an ssh agent running as its user (presumably
'backup', maybe root) and if not send mail to somebody's pager,
complaining about the missing agent. If the agent is running, the
cron job can reconnect to
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:19:11AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Automation with keys stored on machines is better than doing it manually
and forgetting to back up. :-)
Agreed. Like excercise, the kind you do is better than the kind you
don't.
It **does** provide a path by which someone
I have a customer who wants to host his own email server, and he wants
to have long email addresses, like firstname.lastname@domain.com ,
and map it to a local name that is less than 8 chars. What is the best
email server to do this kind of mapping?
-chris zubrzycki
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 02:28:28PM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
Hi all,
What do you think would be the best way to duplicate a HD to another
(similar sized) HD?
I've been using tar on my system. Works excellent. no downtime, and all
permissions are maintained.
--
Nick Jennings
[cc: trimed to something a little more sane]
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 04:21:33PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're pulling **from** a read-only rsyncd. It has to run as root because we
require the right archive, permissions, etc I'm confused; is that much
different from running an
sendmail! :)
j.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Zubrzycki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 4:36 PM
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: long email names
I have a customer who wants to host his own email server, and he wants
to have long email addresses,
Subject: long email names
I have a customer who wants to host his own email server, and he wants
to have long email addresses, like firstname.lastname@domain.com ,
and map it to a local name that is less than 8 chars. What is the best
email server to do this kind of mapping?
-chris
quote who=Chris Zubrzycki
I have a customer who wants to host his own email server, and he wants
to have long email addresses, like firstname.lastname@domain.com ,
and map it to a local name that is less than 8 chars.
This is a sensible request...
What is the best email server to do this
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 03:23:01PM +0200, George Karaolides wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Craig Sanders wrote:
someday soon, someone's going to take the good ideas from djbdns,
combine it with the good stuff from bind (including backwards
compatibility with bind config zonefile formats), add
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 12:52:23AM -0500, P Prince wrote:
there are two major problems with all of bernstein's software. the
first is that it requires you to throw away your existing
configuration...no big deal for a caching only name-server or if you
only have one or two domains to
35 matches
Mail list logo
