On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 01:35:43PM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
Of the Linux distributions supported by Promise (at
http://support.promise.com/Linux/Default.htm), which is closest to
Debian. That is, which requires the least modification to get working with
Debian unstable?
Why not just use
FYI, no one bother decoding this, it's not a photo, actually a
program/trojan. Malicious no doubt...
At 10:24 PM 1/27/02 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos.
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
Hello list,
I just installed openldap and make my own address book on it.
Now I'd like to make my Debian GNU/Linux login and authenticate from the
LDAP server, where should I begin?
I installed libpam-ldap, is it all I have to install?
Is there
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:31, Florian Bantner wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
2b. Create group-entries according to posixGroup
Perhaps it is possible to combine them in one entry since debian
uses the same number for uid, gid of one person. I'm currently
trying this and it
Bummer man,
I clicked on this SPAM link in mutt hoping to see p0rn and it trashed
my Linux box! Hope nobody else did that! :-)
Pete
PS what's with all the SPAM to this list lately... admins? I'll bet it's
that WoW guy that's suing Russell! :-)
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:16, Mark Janssen wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 01:35:43PM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
Of the Linux distributions supported by Promise (at
http://support.promise.com/Linux/Default.htm), which is closest to
Debian. That is, which requires the least modification to
I'm running the 2.4.17 kernels, so... I'm GUESSING Redhat 7.1 would be
closest since 7.1 ships with a 2.4 kernel? Perhaps there are some
other
things to consider as well?
The Red Hat version only supports kernel 2.4.2, expect it to fail on
2.4.17+
because there have been significant
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 07:45:48AM -0500, Peter Billson wrote:
Bummer man,
I clicked on this SPAM link in mutt hoping to see p0rn and it trashed
my Linux box! Hope nobody else did that! :-)
This is just another outlook virus:
http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_99332.htm
it should be
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 11:10:09PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:31, Florian Bantner wrote:
[snip]
auth sufficient pam_rootok.so
auth sufficient pam_ldap.so
auth required pam_unix.so use_first_pass
accountsufficient pam_ldap.so
account
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:18:47PM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
[snip]
The Red Hat version only supports kernel 2.4.2, expect it to
fail on 2.4.17+ because there have been significant changes.
Also expect it to work on the Red Hat 2.4.2 kernel but not a
standard 2.4.2 kernel because Red Hat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi!
the following is not technical but more ethical or so.
recently i was asked to develop some sort of mass email distribution
software for someone sending monthly newsletters about music events to a
list of about 3000 addresses. now, before
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 05:46:46PM +0100, jogi hofmueller wrote:
i know that everyone hates spam. therefore i think the idea to put a
mailing-list-like mechanism with automated (un)subscribe procedure behind
such a thing would be not so bad because it would make it possible to
really
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks!
begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com
M35J0``,$__\``+@`0```
Anyone here have any luck with PPTP through NAT with IPtables? I have
recompiled my kernel with PPTP VPN MASQ support and loaded the module. I
have even verified that the modules is loaded with lsmod. It tells me that
it is unused. I can't seem to authenticate with PPTP to my work's VPN. I
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = new photos from my party!
Scanning Time = 01/28/2002 18:13:47
Action on virus found:
The attachment www.myparty.yahoo.com exists WORM_MYPARTY.A virus.
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = new photos from my party!
Scanning Time = 01/28/2002 18:13:47
Action on virus found:
The attachment www.myparty.yahoo.com exists WORM_MYPARTY.A virus.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 28, 2002 Chris Hilts said:
*| The problem with this rationale is that most people don't bother trying to
unsubscribe, since the unsubscribe
*| instructions are usually just a method of verifying valid addresses.
i am aware of that and this
I don't think this was from me. If I have this virus I am soposed to have a task
called msstask.exe running in the background, I don't. And I certanly didn't open an
atachment called www.myparty.yahoo.com.exe. Also, no one in my office got this from
me either.
-Original
Sincerely,
- Original Message -
From: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jason Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: Software VS Hardware Raid
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:01, Jason Lim wrote:
Case 1)
I replaced one of the disks
This is getting even further off topic, but the first person who figures out how to
make micro payments with regard to the web will make a killing.
There are a lot of newsletters, donations, etc. that I would be more than willing to
pay $0.25 or more to on a regular basis, but there is no way,
My question: if this was hardware RAID 1... would this have
happened? Would the hardware RAID controller recognise the
problem, and only stop briefly, then try the second disk
automatically and transparently?
I believe hardware RAID would have worked transparently here.
With
Micropayments... many companies have tried, many have failed.
The closest I've seen to a functional version of this is PayPal. They
allow micropayments, so have a look into it. Not that I personally like
them a lot, but many people use them, so it may be worthwhile.
Also, if you're looking into
On Tuesday, January 29, 2002, at 09:43 AM, wrote:
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thank
This is a new virus incase you hadn't guessed.
W32/Myparty-mm
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 02:14, Michael Wood wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 11:10:09PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
auth sufficient pam_rootok.so
auth sufficient pam_ldap.so
auth required pam_unix.so use_first_pass
accountsufficient pam_ldap.so
account
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:18, Jason Lim wrote:
The Red Hat version only supports kernel 2.4.2, expect it to fail on
2.4.17+
because there have been significant changes. Also expect it to work on
the
Red Hat 2.4.2 kernel but not a standard 2.4.2 kernel because Red Hat
apply
If you install hardware that requires a binary-only driver then that's a
mistake you will probably regret for years. Use software RAID, spend
more
money to get a Mylex DAC960 with SCSI drives, do anything but using a
binary-only driver.
Point taken.
As far as I can see, only 3ware has an
If the LDAP server accepts the connection and just does nothing then things
can get bad.
I am having a problem like this (I think).
I installed slapd using apt-get and it did not complain. But very strange
things are happening.
When I do an ldapsearch it hangs for a long time and then returns
also sprach jogi hofmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.01.28.1815 +0100]:
the thing with mailman is (we run 20 lists here too using it) that it
provides for many-to-many communication and has proven to create even more
unwanted mail for all the people writing unsubscribes to the list (just to
also sprach Lang Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.01.28.2013 +0100]:
This is getting even further off topic, but the first person who
figures out how to make micro payments with regard to the web will
make a killing.
ask bill gates. he's actually proposed something like this. you
receive an
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 10:54, Jason Lim wrote:
If you install hardware that requires a binary-only driver then that's a
mistake you will probably regret for years. Use software RAID, spend
more
money to get a Mylex DAC960 with SCSI drives, do anything but using a
binary-only driver.
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:10, Tim Uckun wrote:
If the LDAP server accepts the connection and just does nothing then
things can get bad.
I am having a problem like this (I think).
I installed slapd using apt-get and it did not complain. But very strange
things are happening.
When I do an
Using the -x switch to disable SASL is one solution to this (and it's quite
adequate for localhost connections). For network connections you may want to
get SASL working (I don't know how to do this) or to use TLS (not currently
supported in Debian packages last time I checked).
Tried that
Hello, All!
One of our debian potato servers connected to APC BackUPS 600.
I want it to deal properly with power failures.
There are several different packages in potato that seems useful.
But before trying them one by one, I want to ask your suggestion.
What package(s) can you recommend (or
I am having backup troubles.
I ran a e2fsck on my /dev/sda1.
I then ran dump
/sbin/dump 0uaf /dev/ht0 /dev/sda1
I got the following error:
DUMP: short read error from /dev/sda1: [sector -1693761273]:
count=512, got=0
DUMP: bread: lseek fails
DUMP: short read error from /dev/sda1:
34 matches
Mail list logo
