Re: lilo on /dev/hdb to work as /dev/hda

2002-08-17 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
> I was able to copy hda to hdb (fdisk, newfs, rsync, lilo) and then use the if [ $(uname) = "Linux" ] ; then sed 's/newfs/mkfs/' ; fi

Re: lilo on /dev/hdb to work as /dev/hda

2002-08-17 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, Kevin J Menard wrote: > This is a shot in the dark, but could you use the bios option to install > lilo onto that drive. Then use a boot disk to boot off of it. Once > it's up, you could then change the bios option back to 0x80, and rerun > lilo, and should be all set. This

Re: failure notice (about relays.osirusoft.com)

2002-08-17 Thread Jason Lim
> > > > I have communicated with Joe Jared on this (not using real > > identification), and while I won't divulge the private communications > > on a > > public list, the general jist is "i don't get legit emails from Asia, > > nor > > do people that use my list. So I could block all of Asia and n

Re: failure notice (about relays.osirusoft.com)

2002-08-17 Thread Jason Lim
> you seem to have a chip on YOUR shoulder about the osirusoft RBLs. this > is not the first time you have bitched about them in public. Yes... yes I do. I will bitch about things that I see are bad, and try and do things about it (like offer better alternatives). Perhaps you are one to sit on

Re: failure notice (about relays.osirusoft.com)

2002-08-17 Thread Jason Lim
> > > SO... if you plan on receiving email from me or Asia, I suggest you use > > RBLs with clear listing and removal policies and methods (eg. the RBLs I > > listed above, and others), > > This is a good policy. Using DNSBL's that don't have some > resolution method for a black listing is risky.

Re: failure notice (about relays.osirusoft.com)

2002-08-17 Thread thing
what would be the feature syntax in sendmail.mc for using osirusoft please? im in NZ and sick to death of being spammed from asia :] regards Thing Craig Sanders wrote: > you seem to have a chip on YOUR shoulder about the osirusoft RBLs. this > is not the first time you have bitched about the

Re: failure notice (about relays.osirusoft.com)

2002-08-17 Thread John W. M. Stevens
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 12:27:08PM +1000, Jason Lim wrote: > Dear Russel (and anyone else who is using relays.osirusoft.com), > > Because you are using the combined RBL relays.osirusoft.com, and since Joe > Jared (single operator of relays.osirusoft) has a documented chip on his > shoulder against

Re: failure notice (about relays.osirusoft.com)

2002-08-17 Thread Craig Sanders
you seem to have a chip on YOUR shoulder about the osirusoft RBLs. this is not the first time you have bitched about them in public. amusingly, however, you completely discredit your line of argument by suggesting that bl.spamcop.net is a viable substitute. bl.spamcop.net isn't even a good RBL l

Re: failure notice (about relays.osirusoft.com)

2002-08-17 Thread cfm
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 12:27:08PM +1000, Jason Lim wrote: > Dear Russel (and anyone else who is using relays.osirusoft.com), > Jared (single operator of relays.osirusoft) has a documented chip on > his > shoulder against Asia and iAdvantage (upstream, one of the largest ... > > I have communica

Re: failure notice (about relays.osirusoft.com)

2002-08-17 Thread Jason Lim
Dear Russel (and anyone else who is using relays.osirusoft.com), Because you are using the combined RBL relays.osirusoft.com, and since Joe Jared (single operator of relays.osirusoft) has a documented chip on his shoulder against Asia and iAdvantage (upstream, one of the largest bandwidth carrier

Re: mail queue's, ext3 data=journal and sync-mount

2002-08-17 Thread Jason Lim
> Rumour has it that data=journal can actually improve performance in some > situations. If a program is writing lots of small files synchronously (quite > common for a mail server that has one tiny control file for every message, > and the average message file isn't too big) then journalling the

Re: mail queue's, ext3 data=journal and sync-mount

2002-08-17 Thread Russell Coker
I decided that this message is better for Debian-ISP, so I replied to the list and BCC'd you. I hope you don't object. On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 01:20, you wrote: > I'm having some trouble finding info on this stuff and found a > knowledgeable-sounding post of yours on debian-isp. Please ignore if >

RE: Binding Multiple IP's to a single NIC

2002-08-17 Thread Lem Bryant
Hello All, Seems that Ip Aliasing is not installed by default with Woody. I've recompiled the kernel and everything works as expected now. Thanks, Lem -Original Message- From: Jason Lim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 9:06 PM To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org Cc

Re: SpamAssassin Web Configuration

2002-08-17 Thread lists
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 09:11:44AM -0400, Gene Grimm wrote: > Can anyone tell me if there is a canned CGI script to allow clients to > modify their personal settings for SpamAssassin via a web interface? When > looking for this on search engines, I see several providers having something > of this n

Re: 50MB mbox size limit with postfix/procmail

2002-08-17 Thread Oystein Nerhus
Thank you :) That did the trick. Øystein On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 03:53:48PM +0200, Andrius Kasparavicius wrote: > mailbox_size_limit = > > On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Oystein Nerhus wrote: > > > I'm using postfix with procmail for local delivery. Latest versions > > from woody: > > > > ii postfix

Re: 50MB mbox size limit with postfix/procmail

2002-08-17 Thread Andrius Kasparavicius
mailbox_size_limit = On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Oystein Nerhus wrote: > I'm using postfix with procmail for local delivery. Latest versions > from woody: > > ii postfix 1.1.11-0.woody2 > ii procmail 3.22-4 > > When any mbox reaches 50MB, procmail and/or postfix will refuse

50MB mbox size limit with postfix/procmail

2002-08-17 Thread Oystein Nerhus
I'm using postfix with procmail for local delivery. Latest versions from woody: ii postfix 1.1.11-0.woody2 ii procmail 3.22-4 When any mbox reaches 50MB, procmail and/or postfix will refuse to deliver it to that mbox, and the mail is instead delivered to the next mat

RE: Forward email

2002-08-17 Thread Daniel Hooper
The forwarding of email is going to be the easiest thing to do, I'd suggest using sendmail, all you need to do is get a local DNS zone working correctly for the domain(s) your trying to relay. How ever, I've been trying to find a smtp virus scanner, and unfortunatly I havent been able to find anyth

Re: Contacting a linux box behind a vicious cable internet firewall?

2002-08-17 Thread Mitchell Smith
Here is a neet little app that sounds like it will do what you want. It will connect to a trusted host and then you can connect to a port on that trusted host from a 3rd computer and get redirected back in to the firewall one. Hmm, I probably havn't explained it very well, but check it out anyway