> I have some debian servers and hav a pain when these is security
> upgrade package available, for I have to check and upgrade them one by
> one, making sure they are in safe status.
>
> I wonder how the administrator manage dozens or even hundreds of debian
> servers in this case? Any tool or
Hello list,
I have some debian servers and hav a pain when these is security upgrade
package available, for I have to check and upgrade them one by one, making
sure they are in safe status.
I wonder how the administrator manage dozens or even hundreds of debian
servers in this case? Any tool o
> I have some debian servers and hav a pain when these is security
> upgrade package available, for I have to check and upgrade them one by
> one, making sure they are in safe status.
>
> I wonder how the administrator manage dozens or even hundreds of debian
> servers in this case? Any tool or
Hello list,
I have some debian servers and hav a pain when these is security upgrade
package available, for I have to check and upgrade them one by one, making
sure they are in safe status.
I wonder how the administrator manage dozens or even hundreds of debian
servers in this case? Any tool o
I had the same problem before version clamav (0.51-1) was released. One
would likely assume that you are using clamav < 0.24-3 with the
openantivirus list.
clamav (0.51-1) unstable; urgency=low
* removed oav-support since upstream doesn't support it anymore
In version 0.51, they changed the way
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:02, Hereward Cooper wrote:
> I'm planning the design of a file server, with 2 x 60gb drives for files
> being servered (setup as a 24 hour delayed mirror), and a seperate
> smaller 1-2gb drive for the machine's system files.
You won't get any benefit from a 1G drive.
When y
one word, dumb
Your going to rely on an old slow worn out drive to hold your OS.
get a hardware raid card and mirror the 2 x 60 gig drives, use 500 meg for
the OS and 1 gig for /var.
regards
thing
-Original Message-
From: Hereward Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 15 Novem
I'm planning the design of a file server, with 2 x 60gb drives for files
being servered (setup as a 24 hour delayed mirror), and a seperate
smaller 1-2gb drive for the machine's system files.
What I was wondering was, if the two 60gb drives are new high end IDE
drives, and the machine is 1ghz dur
I recently installed the clamav, spamassassin, amavis-postfix, and
oav-update packages on our mail server. Unfortunately, I keep getting a
message that the virus scanner does not function. Everything else is running
well, but when I try to run clamscan manually, it reports the following:
ERROR: he
I had the same problem before version clamav (0.51-1) was released. One
would likely assume that you are using clamav < 0.24-3 with the
openantivirus list.
clamav (0.51-1) unstable; urgency=low
* removed oav-support since upstream doesn't support it anymore
In version 0.51, they changed the way
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:02, Hereward Cooper wrote:
> I'm planning the design of a file server, with 2 x 60gb drives for files
> being servered (setup as a 24 hour delayed mirror), and a seperate
> smaller 1-2gb drive for the machine's system files.
You won't get any benefit from a 1G drive.
When y
one word, dumb
Your going to rely on an old slow worn out drive to hold your OS.
get a hardware raid card and mirror the 2 x 60 gig drives, use 500 meg for
the OS and 1 gig for /var.
regards
thing
-Original Message-
From: Hereward Cooper [mailto:coops@;zadok.org.uk]
Sent: Friday, 15 No
I'm planning the design of a file server, with 2 x 60gb drives for files
being servered (setup as a 24 hour delayed mirror), and a seperate
smaller 1-2gb drive for the machine's system files.
What I was wondering was, if the two 60gb drives are new high end IDE
drives, and the machine is 1ghz dur
I recently installed the clamav, spamassassin, amavis-postfix, and
oav-update packages on our mail server. Unfortunately, I keep getting a
message that the virus scanner does not function. Everything else is running
well, but when I try to run clamscan manually, it reports the following:
ERROR: he
That looks like the right format to me..
I have this:
version "Not a chance :)";
dig version.bind chaos txt
;; ANSWER SECTION:
version.bind. 0 CH TXT "Not a chance :)"
---
Sonny
At 10:55 AM 11/14/2002 -0500, Andrew P. Kaplan wrote:
Instead of displaying my bind version (9.
Hi!
Davi Leal wrote:
> Is sasl compiled "--with-pwcheck" in the debian woody?.
Yes.
> > mkdir /var/pwcheck
> > chmod 777 /var/pwcheck
>
> > pwcheck_method: pwcheck
> /etc/postfix/sasl/smtpd.conf
>
> > * Upon system startup, arrange for the daemon $prefix/sbin/pwcheck
> > to be run as root in t
Hi. Reading the README.pwcheck file:
> * Configure the Cyrus SASL library with the "--with-pwcheck" switch.
> * Compile and install the Cyrus SASL library software
Is sasl compiled "--with-pwcheck" in the debian woody?.
> mkdir /var/pwcheck
> chmod 777 /var/pwcheck
> pwcheck_method: pwcheck
That looks like the right format to me..
I have this:
version "Not a chance :)";
dig version.bind chaos txt
;; ANSWER SECTION:
version.bind. 0 CH TXT "Not a chance :)"
---
Sonny
At 10:55 AM 11/14/2002 -0500, Andrew P. Kaplan wrote:
Instead of displaying my bind ver
Hi!
Davi Leal wrote:
> Is sasl compiled "--with-pwcheck" in the debian woody?.
Yes.
> > mkdir /var/pwcheck
> > chmod 777 /var/pwcheck
>
> > pwcheck_method: pwcheck
> /etc/postfix/sasl/smtpd.conf
>
> > * Upon system startup, arrange for the daemon $prefix/sbin/pwcheck
> > to be run as root in t
Instead of displaying my bind version (9.2) I would prefer to display the
cryptic message listed below. I added it to named.conf, but now dig
@localhost chaos txt version.bind shows nothing. Is it possible to display
the different message without using views.
options {
directory "/var/name
Hi. Reading the README.pwcheck file:
> * Configure the Cyrus SASL library with the "--with-pwcheck" switch.
> * Compile and install the Cyrus SASL library software
Is sasl compiled "--with-pwcheck" in the debian woody?.
> mkdir /var/pwcheck
> chmod 777 /var/pwcheck
> pwcheck_method: pwcheck
Instead of displaying my bind version (9.2) I would prefer to display the
cryptic message listed below. I added it to named.conf, but now dig
@localhost chaos txt version.bind shows nothing. Is it possible to display
the different message without using views.
options {
directory "/var/name
Ciao,
Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 01:55:57AM +0100, gravity wrote:
> dpkg kept complaining about not being able to connect to a database/wrong
> password for the database.
> even after completely opening up the access to the db (pgsql).
>
> anyone know what could have been the problem?
I had the same
Hi
For those of you who would not like to upgrade or wait for the DSA,
here are the ISC patches for BIND 4 and 8:
http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/patches/bind833.diff
bye,
-christian-
--
Christian HammersWESTEND GmbH - Aachen und Dueren Tel 0241/701333-0
ch@westend.com Internet &
Ciao,
Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 01:55:57AM +0100, gravity wrote:
> dpkg kept complaining about not being able to connect to a database/wrong password
>for the database.
> even after completely opening up the access to the db (pgsql).
>
> anyone know what could have been the problem?
I had the same
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
For those of you who would not like to upgrade or wait for the DSA,
here are the ISC patches for BIND 4 and 8:
http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/patches/bind833.diff
bye,
-christian-
--
Christian HammersWESTEND GmbH - Aachen und Dueren Tel 0241/701333-0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Interne
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
30 matches
Mail list logo
