Hello!
I remember, that sendmail, exim, and others have queuing strategies,
that try to minimize the number of remote conections.
El lun, 25-11-2002 a las 07:00, Craig Sanders escribió:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:37:58PM +1100, Jason Lim wrote:
> > > nope, because postfix has no way of knowing
Hello!
El mar, 19-11-2002 a las 17:07, jernej horvat escribió:
...
> I have a question about djbdns - can i have one control file for all
> IP's/interfaces that i have on one system ?
...
You can configure env/IP to 0.0.0.0 so it will listen on _all_
interfaces.
Best Regards,
Jorge-Le
Hello!
Wow, man! this thread is already quite worn out. I love to read Craig
Sanders for some three mails about some topic, but then it get's boring,
Is there a tarpitting filter for Evolution somewhere?
El mar, 19-11-2002 a las 16:17, jernej horvat escribió:
...
>
> If only djb's sw would be
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 12:36:01AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:32:11PM +0800, Daniel Hooper wrote:
> > orange:/# apt-cache search drac
> > drac - Dynamic Relay Authorization Control (pop-before-smtp)
> > drac-dev - Dynamic Relay Authorization Control (development fi
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:32:11PM +0800, Daniel Hooper wrote:
> orange:/# apt-cache search drac
> drac - Dynamic Relay Authorization Control (pop-before-smtp)
> drac-dev - Dynamic Relay Authorization Control (development files)
> qpopper-drac - Qpopper with DRAC Support
Yeah. Most of my users are
orange:/# apt-cache search drac
drac - Dynamic Relay Authorization Control (pop-before-smtp)
drac-dev - Dynamic Relay Authorization Control (development files)
qpopper-drac - Qpopper with DRAC Support
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 26
I'm using multiple companies to give me good POP coverage, but I'm
having a bear of a time allowing my dialup users to be able to send
mail through my server, since I have the relaying locked down fairly
well. How is anyone doing this. I'm using exim. I've tinkered with the
idea of watching the rad
Hi Matias,
> ( If I understand you, you are not using pppoe, you are trying to route the
> packets, is it ok? ).
>
Yes.
> You should have a rule in the output chain that ACCEPT packets to the
> destination ( 0.0.0.0 or what you want ) for the interface eth0.
> In your output chain you only accept
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 06:13:47PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:35:37AM -0800, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 06:56:34PM +0100, ? ? wrote:
> > > About performance - IDE still uses a lot of the CPU
> > now that most servers are far fa
Hi,
apt-get install pppoe
it contains the pppoe server as well. Have fun :)
Cheers,
Domonkos Czinke
-Original Message-
From: benoit auquier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pppoe server
is there any pppoe server for de
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:22, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 11:45:21PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > When you've had a repair-man from the vendor use a hammer to install a
> > CPU you learn to accept that any hardware can be broken no matter how
> > well it's installed.
>
> did he al
is there any pppoe server for debian ? if there is any , where can i find
documentation on how to setup it ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason Lim writes:
> > recently there was a patch floating on the qmail list that patches
> > the way qmail-send runs. The result is having two processes instead,
> > and one performance bottleneck within qmail-send removed. I don't
> > recall the details, but the purported increase in performance
>
#2 (vrrp) is a subset of #3 (LVS / keepalived / vrrp )
I have several boxes configured as master / backup routers with the VRRP
component of keepalived. You just need to configure keepalived to not use
LVS and then you have a clean and simple VRRP install.
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Jeremy Zawodny wr
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 02:17:22PM -0500, Steve Mickeler wrote:
>
> Theres a couple of ways you can do this.
>
> 1) round robin dns : 2 servers with their own IP's, each serving up the
> website. If one goes down, you still get a 50% success rate.
>
> 2) VRRP via keepalived - http://www.keepali
Theres a couple of ways you can do this.
1) round robin dns : 2 servers with their own IP's, each serving up the
website. If one goes down, you still get a 50% success rate.
2) VRRP via keepalived - http://www.keepalived.org/ : 2 servers, 1 real
floating IP that is bound to the active server. I
cluster it, when one box goes down, its backup takes up that IP
Thing
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 20:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Can anyone pls tell me how to setup a Backup Web Server..meaning if the
> primary Web Server fails, it will automatically go to a seperate Web
> Server.
>
> ex.
>
>
cluster it
Thing
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 20:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Can anyone pls tell me how to setup a Backup Web Server..meaning if the
> primary Web Server fails, it will automatically go to a seperate Web
> Server.
>
> ex.
>
> Home User - www.abc.com
>
> Server U
> recently there was a patch floating on the qmail list that patches
> the way qmail-send runs. The result is having two processes instead,
> and one performance bottleneck within qmail-send removed. I don't
> recall the details, but the purported increase in performance
> should be at least a fact
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Sonny Kupka wrote:
> pop-3 stream tcp nowait.200 root/usr/sbin/tcpd
> /usr/sbin/in.qpopper -R -B -f /etc/qpopper.conf
>
> Key being: nowait.200
xinetd uses different configurations than inetd.
Some parts of my configs:
# - added cps for 50 seconds
Craig, my solution is at bottom.
> It's easier if you boot from a rescue disk, then run lilo...
How do you do this remotely?
> > > I have transfered a current linux install across to a new
> > > drive using the cp -a command. I need to now chroot the
Hopefully, the "cp -a" worked properly.
> >
++ 25/11/02 08:51 -0800 - Jeremy C. Reed:
>On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Scott wrote:
>
>> > No performance issues using vm-pop3d, exim (MTA), apache and
>> > OpenWebMail with around 10,000 email accounts on similar hardware.
>>
>> 10,000 email accounts on a similar machine? Man, I must be doing
>> somet
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 11:45:21PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> When you've had a repair-man from the vendor use a hammer to install a CPU you
> learn to accept that any hardware can be broken no matter how well it's
> installed.
did he also use a chainsaw to cut his finger nails?
> Yes.
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:35:37AM -0800, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 06:56:34PM +0100, ? ? wrote:
> > About performance - IDE still uses a lot of the CPU
> now that most servers are far faster than that, we're talking about
> what, 1% or maybe 2% of the CPU?
on m
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Scott wrote:
> > No performance issues using vm-pop3d, exim (MTA), apache and
> > OpenWebMail with around 10,000 email accounts on similar hardware.
>
> 10,000 email accounts on a similar machine? Man, I must be doing
> something wrong! I assume you are running Debian? So
I am running Debian 3.0 on one mail server with 3,000+ mailboxes using
Postfix/Procmail/IMP/MySQL/qpopper/Apache. And I have very low cpu/mem
usages. And it is a single proc PIII-500 with 256MB of ram. And it works
great.
I agree with the other posts that qpopper is a dog, but I don't such a
perf
Qpopper also has a habit of just stopping, I have have to
reload xinetd several times a day.
I run qpopper here with users keeping mail in /var/mail/username and have
no problems what so ever with the setup..
You have your server set to allow alot of "pops" at the same time?
I have this:
p
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 12:00:32AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > Actually, I can't see how Postfix would be at all faster, since it
> > would still be sending individual emails on separate connections. In
> > fact, wouldn't it be slower, since Qmail was optimized specifically
> > for this?
>
> n
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:37:58PM +1100, Jason Lim wrote:
> > nope, because postfix has no way of knowing that they were
> > originally the same email(*). postfix has been handed 10 individual
> > emails by qmail, so it will deliver 10 individual emails.
>
> Mmm... but, for example, if it scanne
I need to boot a cd for an installation on scsi interface
I have seen a small prog before on a floppy that allowed this to happen
I have only played with ide interfaces -
What do i need to take care with?
Do I have to boot from a floppy all the time?
Thanks
Samantha
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Katim S. Touray"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 6:12 PM
Subject: Backup Web Server
Haha I wonder why you choose to send
> > > however, it won't solve the multiple-recipients-at-one-domain
> > > problem. if qmail relays individual messages via a postfix box,
> > > then the postfix box will have individual messages in it's queue -
> > > it can't recombine them into one message. i.e. the "damage" has
> > > already be
Rizal,
Check out HA (High Availability) http://linux-ha.org
Pete
--
http://www.elbnet.com
ELB Internet Service, Inc.
Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet Hosting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Can anyone pls tell me how to setup a Backup Web Server..meaning if the
> primary Web Server
It's easier if you boot from a rescue disk, then run lilo...
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian-ISP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: transfering linux to new HDD
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 08
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 08:40, Craig wrote:
> I have transfered a current linux install across to a new
> drive using the cp -a command. I need to now chroot the
> existing install to the new hdd and tell lilo to boot
> from there.
>
> How do I do this from a remote location ?
If your new drive will b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 25 November 2002 01:02, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> the ISDN stuff is a mess... stuff scattered between /etc/isdn/ and
> /etc/ppp.
man interfaces
"The ppp Method
This method uses pon/poff to configure a PPP interface.
See those commands fo
have a look at zmailer also! if you are limited to choose between the
three you quoted, then postfix is the answer. reasons in other posts
of this thread...
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have be
37 matches
Mail list logo
