Greetings!
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:26:21 +0100 Andrew Miehs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 04:47:47PM +0100, Volker Tanger wrote:
For incoming the firewalls simply use DNS Round-Robin on the FW
members which have to be listed as primary/master servers for the
domain in
Hi all
I am busy setting up a Leased line running from my linux server to a
client's windows 98 laptop but i am having some diificulty getting this to
work .
I have the same setup running between two linux boxes without any problems
so i doubt the problem is with my linux configuration but rather
So it should provide the base features of BIND ... but I'd rather like
to step away from it for security reasons.
Another option should be the posibiltiy to chroot it (like the default
chroot of other daemons like postfix, etc).
BIND 9.2.x of course,
Greetings!
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:26:21 +0100 Andrew Miehs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 04:47:47PM +0100, Volker Tanger wrote:
For incoming the firewalls simply use DNS Round-Robin on the FW
members which have to be listed as primary/master servers for the
domain in
Hi all
I am busy setting up a Leased line running from my linux server to a
client's windows 98 laptop but i am having some diificulty getting this to
work .
I have the same setup running between two linux boxes without any problems
so i doubt the problem is with my linux configuration but rather
Hi all,
Which DNS server would you recommend that provides following functionality:
o ACL-System based on IP-address
(like having netblocks to do querying everything and all
others could just query domains that they are allowed to;
same
So it should provide the base features of BIND ... but I'd rather like
to step away from it for security reasons.
Another option should be the posibiltiy to chroot it (like the default
chroot of other daemons like postfix, etc).
BIND 9.2.x of course,
also sprach Markus Welsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.03.14.1502 +0100]:
o ACL-System based on IP-address
(like having netblocks to do querying everything and all
others could just query domains that they are allowed to;
same goes for update)
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.03.14.1805 +0100]:
o support for DNSSec
i am sure there are patches out there.
wait, djbdns doesn't need DNSSEC at all. it doesn't suffer from
AXFR/IXFR problems like BIND.
seriously, djbdns is nice. you should try it.
--
Please do
also sprach Eduard Ballester [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.03.14.1717 +0100]:
BIND 9.2.x of course,
ugh.
* DNS Security
DNSSEC (signed zones)
TSIG (signed DNS requests)
TSIG: there may well be patches to djbdns. However, for internal
clients, IPsec is really the way to go.
One
I just ran chkrootkit,and it at one point, indicates that I may have an
LKM rootkit installed on my box (see output below). I then downloaded
and installed sash, and when I run chkrootkit as sashroot, It doesnt
detect anything (also see output below). Which should I believe? Is
there any way to
On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 06:04, David H. Clymer wrote:
I just ran chkrootkit,and it at one point, indicates that I may have an
LKM rootkit installed on my box (see output below). I then downloaded
and installed sash, and when I run chkrootkit as sashroot, It doesnt
detect anything (also see
12 matches
Mail list logo
