On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 00:29, Doug Griswold wrote:
> I used the same filesystem type and mount options. It's a very
> perplexing issue, I've always seen better performance out of debian over
> red hat. But my experience on scsi raid is very limited.
mke2fs has options to tune the file system for th
I used the same filesystem type and mount options. It's a very
perplexing issue, I've always seen better performance out of debian over
red hat. But my experience on scsi raid is very limited.
Thanks Again
>>> Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/22/03 18:07 PM >>>
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 05:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 05:26:46PM -0500, Doug Griswold wrote:
> You are right about the 10 percent hdparm is kinda suckey when it comes
> to giving absolute resulte but it will give you a general idea of what
> the disks are doing. I didn't reassign the disks when installing
> debian, I basicall
You are right about the 10 percent hdparm is kinda suckey when it comes
to giving absolute resulte but it will give you a general idea of what
the disks are doing. I didn't reassign the disks when installing
debian, I basically just booted into debian deleted the partitions that
were there from r
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 00:29, Doug Griswold wrote:
> I used the same filesystem type and mount options. It's a very
> perplexing issue, I've always seen better performance out of debian over
> red hat. But my experience on scsi raid is very limited.
mke2fs has options to tune the file system for th
I used the same filesystem type and mount options. It's a very
perplexing issue, I've always seen better performance out of debian over
red hat. But my experience on scsi raid is very limited.
Thanks Again
>>> Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/22/03 18:07 PM >>>
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 05:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 05:26:46PM -0500, Doug Griswold wrote:
> You are right about the 10 percent hdparm is kinda suckey when it comes
> to giving absolute resulte but it will give you a general idea of what
> the disks are doing. I didn't reassign the disks when installing
> debian, I basicall
You are right about the 10 percent hdparm is kinda suckey when it comes
to giving absolute resulte but it will give you a general idea of what
the disks are doing. I didn't reassign the disks when installing
debian, I basically just booted into debian deleted the partitions that
were there from r
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 17:41, Doug Griswold wrote:
> I installed the Red Hat kernel and performance was affected some but not
> much. I now get between 50-56Mb/s but still not close to the 70Mb/s of
> before.
Is hdparm accurate enough to determine a <10% difference? I suspect that your
results so
Just noticed the following in logs for one of my servers:
Mar 21 22:28:23 your rpc.statd[196]: gethostbyname error for
^Xø^Xø^Zø^Zø%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%62716x%hn%51859x%hn\220\220\220\220\220\220\22
0\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\2
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 17:41, Doug Griswold wrote:
> I installed the Red Hat kernel and performance was affected some but not
> much. I now get between 50-56Mb/s but still not close to the 70Mb/s of
> before.
Is hdparm accurate enough to determine a <10% difference? I suspect that your
results so
Just noticed the following in logs for one of my servers:
Mar 21 22:28:23 your rpc.statd[196]: gethostbyname error for
^Xø^Xø^Zø^Zø%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%62716x%hn%51859x%hn\220\220\220\220\220\220\22
0\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\220\2
I installed the Red Hat kernel and performance was affected some but not
much. I now get between 50-56Mb/s but still not close to the 70Mb/s of
before.
I'm not sure what you mean here "Also did you
re-create the RAID device in the process of installing Debian?" if you
could explain this to me a
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 03:05:27PM +, Grzesiek Sedek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'll be setting up a student mail server, the idea is that each student
> will have a email (webmail), and their login will let them log in to
> intranet site as well.
> So I probably loking on some kin
Hi all,
I'll be setting up a student mail server, the idea is that each student
will have a email (webmail), and their login will let them log in to
intranet site as well.
So I probably loking on some kind of exim - sql setup?
Is there anything ready made out there?
What do you guys suggest?
Thank
I installed the Red Hat kernel and performance was affected some but not
much. I now get between 50-56Mb/s but still not close to the 70Mb/s of
before.
I'm not sure what you mean here "Also did you
re-create the RAID device in the process of installing Debian?" if you
could explain this to me a
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 03:05:27PM +, Grzesiek Sedek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'll be setting up a student mail server, the idea is that each student
> will have a email (webmail), and their login will let them log in to
> intranet site as well.
> So I probably loking on some kind
Hi all,
I'll be setting up a student mail server, the idea is that each student
will have a email (webmail), and their login will let them log in to
intranet site as well.
So I probably loking on some kind of exim - sql setup?
Is there anything ready made out there?
What do you guys suggest?
Thank
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 04:54, Doug Griswold wrote:
> Hey guys I am having a small performance problem with a dell 1650 with
> the perc3/di raid 5 card. I had red hat on this box and was getting
> 70-75Mb/s when testing with hdparm -tT /dev/sda. Now using Debian I am
> getting 40-50Mb/s. I am usin
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 04:54, Doug Griswold wrote:
> Hey guys I am having a small performance problem with a dell 1650 with
> the perc3/di raid 5 card. I had red hat on this box and was getting
> 70-75Mb/s when testing with hdparm -tT /dev/sda.
I suggest using anything other than hdparm for benchmar
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 04:54, Doug Griswold wrote:
> Hey guys I am having a small performance problem with a dell 1650 with
> the perc3/di raid 5 card. I had red hat on this box and was getting
> 70-75Mb/s when testing with hdparm -tT /dev/sda. Now using Debian I am
> getting 40-50Mb/s. I am usin
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 04:54, Doug Griswold wrote:
> Hey guys I am having a small performance problem with a dell 1650 with
> the perc3/di raid 5 card. I had red hat on this box and was getting
> 70-75Mb/s when testing with hdparm -tT /dev/sda.
I suggest using anything other than hdparm for benchmar
22 matches
Mail list logo
