On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 11:18, axacheng wrote:
> Hello lists :
>
> Does anyone knows , How to monitor Software RAID disk I/O
>
> i have a Software RAID5 device named "/dev/md0" , i've tried to use
> "iostat" to monitor /dev/md0 I/O status ...
/proc/partitions does not have any counts for softw
Hi all. I'm searching for a trouble-ticket system that doesn't suck.
Currently we're using RT, and IMHO it sucks.
What I want is something *quiet*. What I want doesn't break threaded
mail reading the way RT does. What I want leaves the headers of a
message intact, rather than sending a whole ne
Hello lists :
Does anyone knows , How to monitor Software RAID disk I/O
i have a Software RAID5 device named "/dev/md0" , i've tried to use "iostat"
to monitor /dev/md0 I/O status ...
But, it's seems doesn't work !!!
===
fileserver:/etc/rc.boot# iostat -x /dev/m
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 11:18, axacheng wrote:
> Hello lists :
>
> Does anyone knows , How to monitor Software RAID disk I/O
>
> i have a Software RAID5 device named "/dev/md0" , i've tried to use
> "iostat" to monitor /dev/md0 I/O status ...
/proc/partitions does not have any counts for softw
Hi all. I'm searching for a trouble-ticket system that doesn't suck.
Currently we're using RT, and IMHO it sucks.
What I want is something *quiet*. What I want doesn't break threaded
mail reading the way RT does. What I want leaves the headers of a
message intact, rather than sending a whole ne
Hello lists :
Does anyone knows , How to monitor Software RAID disk I/O
i have a Software RAID5 device named "/dev/md0" , i've tried to use "iostat" to
monitor /dev/md0 I/O status ...
But, it's seems doesn't work !!!
===
fileserver:/etc/rc.boot# iostat -x /dev/m
Ah yes, that's right I remember now. This is exactly the kind of situation
as to why you shouldn't use CNAME's for MX names or for any official machine
name for that matter. CNAME's are just for human convenience, a host should
never try to pass itself off by one. Screws up the double reverse lo
Ah yes, that's right I remember now. This is exactly the kind of situation
as to why you shouldn't use CNAME's for MX names or for any official machine
name for that matter. CNAME's are just for human convenience, a host should
never try to pass itself off by one. Screws up the double reverse lo
Leonardo Boselli wrote:
I posted some weeks ago a question on "satellite network" ... i have not
yet tested but i will do in next days,
Now I have more information on the services required: not only a
"satellite"network, but the expansion plans for our department calla also
for a lab in an old
In Dallas (TX, US), SBC provides DSL with the option of Business Class
DSL, providing 5 static IP's. I believe that on the west coast, PacBell
provides standard class DSL with one static IP (they did a year ago).
Business Class DSL costs $75/mo, while the PacBell thing was around $40/mo
if I rememb
Leonardo Boselli wrote:
I posted some weeks ago a question on "satellite network" ... i have not
yet tested but i will do in next days,
Now I have more information on the services required: not only a
"satellite"network, but the expansion plans for our department calla also
for a lab in an old
In Dallas (TX, US), SBC provides DSL with the option of Business Class
DSL, providing 5 static IP's. I believe that on the west coast, PacBell
provides standard class DSL with one static IP (they did a year ago).
Business Class DSL costs $75/mo, while the PacBell thing was around $40/mo
if I rememb
At 07:35 PM 7/8/2003 -0400, Jesse Molina wrote:
The real problem is that you are a second class Internet citizen because
you don't have a "business class" service, which means a T1, E1, or greater.
Honestly I gave up trying to host my server at home.. Several friends and I
went in on a rack at XO
At 07:35 PM 7/8/2003 -0400, Jesse Molina wrote:
The real problem is that you are a second class Internet citizen because
you don't have a "business class" service, which means a T1, E1, or greater.
Honestly I gave up trying to host my server at home.. Several friends and I
went in on a rack at XO
I posted some weeks ago a question on "satellite network" ... i have not
yet tested but i will do in next days,
Now I have more information on the services required: not only a
"satellite"network, but the expansion plans for our department calla also
for a lab in an old building.
This building,
On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, 12:35:58 AM Jesse wrote:
JM> Here is some helpful info;
JM> http://postmaster.info.aol.com/index.html
Yes, that is moderately useful, which is more than I can say for the
information provided by BT, my ISP.
JM> http://members.aol.com/adamkb/aol/mailfaq/
I'll check.
If I remember right, you should never make an MX record direct to a
CNAME, for reasons that I can't remember right now.
All the same, you are right, I could just make my MX be the PTR and most
MTAs would be happy.
Unfortunately, the record does not exist, so no help there.
Chris Wagner wrote:
17 matches
Mail list logo
