Virtualusertable in sendmail don't work.

2003-07-23 Thread Erick Lopez Carreon
Hello: I'm triying to use virtualusertable feature of sendmail I put in my sendmail.mc: LOCAL_CONFIG FEATURE(`nullclient', jupiter.dmz.technitrade.com)dnl LOCAL_CONFIG ## Custom configurations below (will be preserved) FEATURE(`virtusertable', `hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable.db')dnl And mak

[Help] apache2 with openldap question.....

2003-07-23 Thread axacheng
Hello List¡G i'm axa from Asia , i've a question about apache2 TLS/SSL authenticate through openldap i've post my question in Gentoo GNU/Linux forum URL as follow http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=69409 Could u look my question detail when u free. That's a very strange questioni CAN

Re: netsaint-neat errors

2003-07-23 Thread Wim Fournier
>> And about neat, well... I never got it to work nicely and it doesn't >> make any sense anyhow (IMHO), just learn the configfile syntax... its >> much easier.. > > I agree, I'm usually a greater fan of text files - but I thought just > for once it might be nice to take the easy route ;) Oh well

Re: netsaint-neat errors

2003-07-23 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 4:16 pm, you wrote: > Greetings! Hullo! :) > I guess NEAT is trying to open the files in R/W mode - which will fail > as the web server process UID probably is WWW-DATA, but all files are > -rw-r--r-- and owned by ROOT. Try CHOWNing the files to WWW-DATA Oh of course :D

Re: netsaint-neat errors

2003-07-23 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 3:48 pm, Wim Fournier wrote: > > I'm running woody with no funny stuff or backports, and have installed > > Netsaint and the netsaint-neat CGI config editor. > > Are you running netsaint?? In my opinion its much better to install Nagios > instead as netsaint is not being d

Re: netsaint-neat errors

2003-07-23 Thread Volker Tanger
Greetings! On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:29:37 +0100 Gavin Hamill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Netsaint itself is working well, but I'd like to make use of the > graphical editor, however when I browse to > http://hostname/cgi-bin/netsaint/neat.cgi I'm told: > > ERROR - could not load the config files

Re: netsaint-neat errors

2003-07-23 Thread Wim Fournier
> I'm running woody with no funny stuff or backports, and have installed > Netsaint and the netsaint-neat CGI config editor. Are you running netsaint?? In my opinion its much better to install Nagios instead as netsaint is not being developed any more. And about neat, well... I never got it to wo

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

2003-07-23 Thread Russell Coker
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > there is another dns auth serevr project that ripe started, but i > can't remember the name nsd. It's in Debian. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie+

netsaint-neat errors

2003-07-23 Thread Gavin Hamill
Hullo :) I've been an avid Debian user for a couple of years now, and I'm quite competent with what I do, but now and again something comes along that just doesn't make sense at all, and this, happy people, is one of those times :) I'm running woody with no funny stuff or backports, and have in

Unidentified subject!

2003-07-23 Thread Nick Silkey
unsubscribe debian-isp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Vacation ---- auto-reply

2003-07-23 Thread Theodore J. Knab
The vacation program which I use on our Campus Email server does not do this. To bad more don't use it. >From the 'vacation' man page: No message will be sent unless login (or an alias supplied using the -a option) is part of either the ``To:'' or ``Cc:'' headers of the mail. No messages from ``

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

2003-07-23 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 12:03:43PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 17 lines which said: > > That's nsd and it is no longer a project. > > URL? apt-get install nsd :-) Upstream is http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/index.html> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

2003-07-23 Thread j
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:06:51AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > (powerdns is fastest authoritive dns server around > You must be kidding, on every benchmark we performed, i was faster then bind on those test that i made, but i don't use it because it lacks some "bind features".oh an

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

2003-07-23 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:53:53PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 25 lines which said: > - v8 is stable 8.4 broke TSIG (secure zone transfers, RFC 2845), which worked before. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

2003-07-23 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:53:53PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 25 lines which said: > (powerdns is fastest authoritive dns server around You must be kidding, on every benchmark we performed, PowerDNS is much slower than BIND (even PowerDNS with its BIND bac