On Tuesday 21 October 2003 13:43, Rod Rodolico wrote:
> Stupid Question: I have about 50 web sites and a few hundred e-mail
> accounts to move to a new server. New IP address, etc... Web sites are no
> problem, but I do not want my clients to notice any problems with e-mail.
> They have IMAP availa
Stupid Question: I have about 50 web sites and a few hundred e-mail accounts to
move to a new
server. New IP address, etc... Web sites are no problem, but I do not want my
clients to
notice any problems with e-mail. They have IMAP available, so many of the
clients store their
e-mail on the serve
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 13:43, Rod Rodolico wrote:
> Stupid Question: I have about 50 web sites and a few hundred e-mail
> accounts to move to a new server. New IP address, etc... Web sites are no
> problem, but I do not want my clients to notice any problems with e-mail.
> They have IMAP availa
Stupid Question: I have about 50 web sites and a few hundred e-mail accounts to move
to a new
server. New IP address, etc... Web sites are no problem, but I do not want my clients
to
notice any problems with e-mail. They have IMAP available, so many of the clients
store their
e-mail on the serve
Marc,
Thanks.
http://www.grsecurity.net looks very interesting.
Another couple of jobs have popped up which I need to address first
so I don't tihink I'll be working on this 'til later in the week.
When I do I'll be sure to post an update to the list.
Many thanks to you all.
It would not be possibl
Marc,
Thanks.
http://www.grsecurity.net looks very interesting.
Another couple of jobs have popped up which I need to address first
so I don't tihink I'll be working on this 'til later in the week.
When I do I'll be sure to post an update to the list.
Many thanks to you all.
It would not be pos
Am Mon, 2003-10-20 um 21.56 schrieb Steve Kemp:
> I'm downloading the ISO now, but I'm a little put of to see that it's
> going to be a commercial offering. I'm keen to stick to free software
> especially considering the most important components are going to be
> free.
As far as I know onl
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:47:18PM +0200, Markus Oswald wrote:
> Not really answering your question about mass-installing Debian but
> suggesting another solution/approach:
> Did you take a look at Gibraltar Linux (www.gibraltar.at)? It's a Debian
> GNU/Linux based Firewall-Distribution which wil
I tryed to run ssh with debuging, but nothing pertucular showed up.
--
MVH/With sincere regards,
Frank Stefan Sundberg Solli
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Mon, 2003-10-20 um 19.25 schrieb Steve Kemp:
> I think I want to trim down the installer such that I don't have to
> answer so many questions, and just input basic information like
> hostname, etc.
>
> Any pointers appreciated - I wasn't sure this is the best list but
> I assume any larg
* Frank Stefan Sundberg Solli schrieb am 20.10.03 um 19:07 Uhr:
> When i am trying to ssh from my workstation to my other box i get a
> "timout before authentication" error message, But when i have dialed up
> to the internet and trying to connect to my box on my network it works
> perfectly, what
> When i am trying to ssh from my workstation to my other box i get a
> "timout before authentication" error message, But when i have dialed up
Probably a DNS problem.
Check A- and PTR- records.
--
__
Yours sincerely,
Christofer Algotsson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
I'm looking at putting together a large number of VPN servers,
running IPSEC and PPTPD (purely for the Windows 98 machines I have
to allow onto the network).
What I'd like to do is create a cut down installation based upon
the stock Debian install, but including a new kernel image to supp
When i am trying to ssh from my workstation to my other box i get a
"timout before authentication" error message, But when i have dialed up
to the internet and trying to connect to my box on my network it works
perfectly, what on earth can couse this?, i have checked the network
properties and they
You can still use local users even if you use pam (+nsswitch will be
necessary). You specify this in nsswitch.conf. Also, you can configure
the pam config files so that it allows both local (unix) and ldap users.
You shouldnt need to drop the firewall at certain times.
mimo
Giacomo A. Catenazz
Hello.
I want to hack PAM authentification in a remote machine (moving to pam_ldap),
but I want to be sure to continue to access the machine if something go wrong.
So I ask you: How do you handle special access to remote machines?
For firewall hacking I used 'cron' to disable the firewalls at a
We offer canned peach in syrup x 850 grs. box x 24 Cans u$s 15 FOB Buenos Aires.
Bairestrade Brokers
Viamonte 1546 7o 703
www.bairestrade.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bajo decreto S1618 titulo 3ro. aprobado por el 105 Congreso de
Estandarización de Normativas
Bajo el Decreto S.1618 TITULO III aprobad
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:05:05 +0200,
Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
..on tracking down noise sources defeating 802.11 wifi signals,
causing DOS, investigation tools?
..airsnort, wavemon, gkrellmwireless, what else do I need to
spot noise sources?
* Rudi Starcevic schrieb am 19.10.03 um 04:30 Uhr:
> Thanks Marc,
>
> Thanks also to Russel.
>
> > I did it with pam_chroot which is really nice
>
> Great - I'll start looking here.
>
> Currently we only really offer FTP access but would like
> to include SSH access too.
>
> I know with the ri
Am Son, 2003-10-19 um 08.29 schrieb Arnt Karlsen:
> ..I saw "raid over net" somewhere, where? Testing? Sid?
> I allway keep finding stuff I can use, the next month. ;-)
You probably mean DRBD.
As far as I remember it's packaged for testing and unstable...
best regards
Markus
--
Markus Osw
20 matches
Mail list logo
