i'm happily using postfix (virtual domains, maildirs, sasl..), courier
imap/pop/sasl, openwebmail, pam.. are there any reasonable advanteges with
www.xmailserver.org? Any experiences?
Thanks
David
>- Original Message -
> From: "Ben Blier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Apply this pack
>
> Just making sure noone is dumb enough to download this file. It is
> virus infected.
No, it's not. It's a mail sent f
i'm happily using postfix (virtual domains, maildirs, sasl..), courier
imap/pop/sasl, openwebmail, pam.. are there any reasonable advanteges with
www.xmailserver.org? Any experiences?
Thanks
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
--
REMEMBER THE WORLD TRADE CENTER ---=< WTC 911 >=--
"...ne cede males"
0100
--
REMEMBER THE WORLD TRADE CENTER ---=< WTC 911 >=--
"...ne cede males"
0100
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just making sure noone is dumb enough to download this file. It is
virus infected.
> An unidentified someone repsonded to the original question:
> > Try putting the map=... Line in the specific to kernel section.
Theodore Knab wrote:
[snip]
I think what the response at the top refers to is removing this line:
> map=/boot/map
and placing separate map= lines in *EACH* of the ima
Just making sure noone is dumb enough to download this file. It is
virus infected.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> An unidentified someone repsonded to the original question:
> > Try putting the map=... Line in the specific to kernel section.
Theodore Knab wrote:
[snip]
I think what the response at the top refers to is removing this line:
> map=/boot/map
and placing separate map= lines in *EACH* of the ima
I was wondering if anyone is running a heavy worked server with memory above
4GB on a
SMP 32 bit i386 machine.
I think that my mail server at work is getting bounce buffers, but I am not
sure
how to detect them. Does anybody no how ?
I compiled my kernel for High Memory support, but I am not
I have a 'map=' parameter, but when I use 2 kernels of the same stock as
in the full lilo.conf below the wrong system.map file is being loaded.
For example, it seems that the xfs kernel loads the system-2.4.10 system map
file rather than the one I want it to load, which is the
'/boot/system-2.4.1
I was wondering if anyone is running a heavy worked server with memory above 4GB on a
SMP 32 bit i386 machine.
I think that my mail server at work is getting bounce buffers, but I am not sure
how to detect them. Does anybody no how ?
I compiled my kernel for High Memory support, but I am not su
I have a 'map=' parameter, but when I use 2 kernels of the same stock as
in the full lilo.conf below the wrong system.map file is being loaded.
For example, it seems that the xfs kernel loads the system-2.4.10 system map
file rather than the one I want it to load, which is the
'/boot/system-2.4.1
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 13:52:02 +0100, Erik Grinaker wrote:
> I would recommend the exiscan-acl patch for Exim,
It is included in the exim4-daemon-heavy package.
Ray (a happy exim4 and exim4 backports user)
--
sendmail.cf does not resemble line noise. It resembles the result of
somebody bangin
Hi guys
We have been using:
smtp..qmail
anti-virusclamav
scanner...qmail-scanner
webmail...sqwebmail
GUI...vqadmin+qmailadmin
virtual domains...vpopmail
pop/imap..courier-imap
list..ezmlm
as a mail solution for ours clients who, m
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 13:52:02 +0100, Erik Grinaker wrote:
> I would recommend the exiscan-acl patch for Exim,
It is included in the exim4-daemon-heavy package.
Ray (a happy exim4 and exim4 backports user)
--
sendmail.cf does not resemble line noise. It resembles the result of
somebody bangin
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 00:37, Paul Dwerryhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:44:54PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I've run 250,000 users per mail store using Maildir format, Courier
> > and Qmail, given a choice I'd do it all the same apart from using
> > Postfix instead of
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 12:05, Paulo Ricardo wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> We have been using:
*snip*
We're using something very similar here.
qmail/sqwebmail/qmailadmin/vpopmail.
We have to be able to do
smtp, smtp auth, pop, imap at the very least.
> Question:
>
> What is the best tools to work w/
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:44:54PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> I've run 250,000 users per mail store using Maildir format, Courier
> and Qmail, given a choice I'd do it all the same apart from using
> Postfix instead of Qmail.
Does Postfix yet have the ability to handle LDAP users on multiple
b
Microsoft
All Products |
Support |
Search |
Microsoft.com Guide
Microsoft Home
Microsoft Client
this is the latest version of security update, the
"December 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which eliminates
all known security vulnerabilities affecting
MS Interne
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 00:37, Paul Dwerryhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:44:54PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I've run 250,000 users per mail store using Maildir format, Courier
> > and Qmail, given a choice I'd do it all the same apart from using
> > Postfix instead of
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 13:05, Paulo Ricardo wrote:
> What is the best tools to work w/ exim ?
> smtp...exim
> anti-virus.clamav
> spam...spamassassin or ???
> scanner??
I would recommend the exiscan-acl patch for Exim, which lets you run
content checks a
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:44:54PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> I've run 250,000 users per mail store using Maildir format, Courier
> and Qmail, given a choice I'd do it all the same apart from using
> Postfix instead of Qmail.
Does Postfix yet have the ability to handle LDAP users on multiple
b
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 23:24, Tinus Nijmeijers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > pop/imap...courier or Cyrus ???
>
> I'm curious about this one. I've been postponing installing one of these
> 'till someone with knowledge about both can give some info about the
> choice. Any other imap/pop servers
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 12:05, Paulo Ricardo wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> We have been using:
*snip*
We're using something very similar here.
qmail/sqwebmail/qmailadmin/vpopmail.
We have to be able to do
smtp, smtp auth, pop, imap at the very least.
> Question:
>
> What is the best tools to work w/
Microsoft
All Products |
Support |
Search |
Microsoft.com Guide
Microsoft Home
Microsoft Client
this is the latest version of security update, the
"December 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which eliminates
all known security vulnerabilities affecting
MS Interne
> pop/imap...courier or Cyrus ???
I'm curious about this one. I've been postponing installing one of these
'till someone with knowledge about both can give some info about the
choice. Any other imap/pop servers that are an option?
tinus
Hi guys
We have been using:
smtp..qmail
anti-virusclamav
scanner...qmail-scanner
webmail...sqwebmail
GUI...vqadmin+qmailadmin
virtual domains...vpopmail
pop/imap..courier-imap
list..ezmlm
as a mail solution for ours clients who, m
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 13:05, Paulo Ricardo wrote:
> What is the best tools to work w/ exim ?
> smtp...exim
> anti-virus.clamav
> spam...spamassassin or ???
> scanner??
I would recommend the exiscan-acl patch for Exim, which lets you run
content checks a
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 23:24, Tinus Nijmeijers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > pop/imap...courier or Cyrus ???
>
> I'm curious about this one. I've been postponing installing one of these
> 'till someone with knowledge about both can give some info about the
> choice. Any other imap/pop servers
> pop/imap...courier or Cyrus ???
I'm curious about this one. I've been postponing installing one of these
'till someone with knowledge about both can give some info about the
choice. Any other imap/pop servers that are an option?
tinus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cool, I know the answer to that one.
You can use DMO (http://sourceforge.net/projects/dmo)
The sourceforge link is the frontend to the database. Its still lacking
some scripts
but in general, it uses nmap, nessus etc. to discover as much as
possible f
Hi,
>> for file in /etc/*; do
>> perl -pi -e "s/12.34.56.78/23.34.45.56/ $file;"
>> done
> ^^^ wouldn't be *QUITE* right ;)
>
> the $file should be in a seperate set of "", so perl -pi -e
> "s/12.34.56.78/23.34.45.56/sg;" "$file"
sure. untested, as I said :-)
Mike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cool, I know the answer to that one.
You can use DMO (http://sourceforge.net/projects/dmo)
The sourceforge link is the frontend to the database. Its still lacking
some scripts
but in general, it uses nmap, nessus etc. to discover as much as
possible f
On 2003-12-04 10:15:13 + Michael Forster
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there a tool to change all occurences of a servers ip-address?
in bash:
for file in /etc/*; do
perl -pi -e "s/12.34.56.78/23.34.45.56/ $file;"
done
^^^ wouldn't be *QUITE* right ;)
the $file
Hi,
>> for file in /etc/*; do
>> perl -pi -e "s/12.34.56.78/23.34.45.56/ $file;"
>> done
> ^^^ wouldn't be *QUITE* right ;)
>
> the $file should be in a seperate set of "", so perl -pi -e
> "s/12.34.56.78/23.34.45.56/sg;" "$file"
sure. untested, as I said :-)
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> is there a tool to change all occurences of a servers ip-address?
in bash:
for file in /etc/*; do
perl -pi -e "s/12.34.56.78/23.34.45.56/ $file;"
done
(not tested - make a backup before)
Mike
On 2003-12-04 10:15:13 + Michael Forster
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there a tool to change all occurences of a servers ip-address?
in bash:
for file in /etc/*; do
perl -pi -e "s/12.34.56.78/23.34.45.56/ $file;"
done
^^^ wouldn't be *QUITE* right ;)
the $f
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> is there a tool to change all occurences of a servers ip-address?
in bash:
for file in /etc/*; do
perl -pi -e "s/12.34.56.78/23.34.45.56/ $file;"
done
(not tested - make a backup before)
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Michael Loftis wrote:
> cfengine is a tool built for this sort of thing. It allows you to apply
> and configure systems while still maintaining their identities. It's a
> very complicated tool though FYI.
>
First of all, sorry for my english, I'm not quite goot yet!
I've
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:04:26PM +0100,
David Zejda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 29 lines which said:
> flat files can't be "down". wouldn't be better to generate flat
> files from the backend db to avoid such risks?
I agree.
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Michael Loftis wrote:
> cfengine is a tool built for this sort of thing. It allows you to apply
> and configure systems while still maintaining their identities. It's a
> very complicated tool though FYI.
>
First of all, sorry for my english, I'm not quite goot yet!
I've
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:04:26PM +0100,
David Zejda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 29 lines which said:
> flat files can't be "down". wouldn't be better to generate flat
> files from the backend db to avoid such risks?
I agree.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
43 matches
Mail list logo
