We too use cerberus and its quite a nice application and very
inexpensive for what it does.
Pete Shuleski
Network Administrator
http://www.nni.com
John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
We currently use a commercial system, but it works great for us, and the
price really isnt that bad. It also is mo
We too use cerberus and its quite a nice application and very
inexpensive for what it does.
Pete Shuleski
Network Administrator
http://www.nni.com
John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
We currently use a commercial system, but it works great for us, and the
price really isnt that bad. It also is m
Like I said, hidden and the like are not approved, arpfilter is the
approved method of doing this now. I haven't yet converted here, but it's
part of netfilter/iptables code and I know there is documentation out there
onnit.
--On Wednesday, December 10, 2003 16:52 -0500 Todd Charron
<[EMAIL P
Like I said, hidden and the like are not approved, arpfilter is the
approved method of doing this now. I haven't yet converted here, but it's
part of netfilter/iptables code and I know there is documentation out there
onnit.
--On Wednesday, December 10, 2003 16:52 -0500 Todd Charron
<[EMAIL P
Is the noarp patch in the stable archive then? I haven't been able to find
it. I was hoping to build it completely with software from the archive. It
seems odd that the ipvs patch is there, but the noarp patch which is pretty
much required to use ipvs isn't.
Todd
On December 10, 2003 04:14
Uhm, I'm not sure where it is anymore but I do have some patches that apply
more or less cleanly.
The 'approved' method in 2.4 is to use arp filters.
--On Wednesday, December 10, 2003 15:49 -0500 Todd Charron
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to set up an LVS with 2 directors an
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 08:09:45PM +0100, Thomas Kirk wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 06:40:41PM +0100, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
>
>> replacing it with RT (bestpractical.com). A really great, widely used,
>> stable and extensible system. It just need some work to feet our needs
>> but is designed to
Is the noarp patch in the stable archive then? I haven't been able to find
it. I was hoping to build it completely with software from the archive. It
seems odd that the ipvs patch is there, but the noarp patch which is pretty
much required to use ipvs isn't.
Todd
On December 10, 2003 04:14
Hi,
I've been trying to set up an LVS with 2 directors and 2 real servers. I've
built the kernel from the 2.4.18 sources in stable along with the patch
kernel-patch-2.4-ipvs. However, I can't seem to find the hidden devices
patch in the archive. Does one exist? Or is there another place I
Uhm, I'm not sure where it is anymore but I do have some patches that apply
more or less cleanly.
The 'approved' method in 2.4 is to use arp filters.
--On Wednesday, December 10, 2003 15:49 -0500 Todd Charron
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to set up an LVS with 2 directors
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 08:09:45PM +0100, Thomas Kirk wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 06:40:41PM +0100, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
>
>> replacing it with RT (bestpractical.com). A really great, widely used,
>> stable and extensible system. It just need some work to feet our needs
>> but is designed to
Hi,
I've been trying to set up an LVS with 2 directors and 2 real servers. I've
built the kernel from the 2.4.18 sources in stable along with the patch
kernel-patch-2.4-ipvs. However, I can't seem to find the hidden devices
patch in the archive. Does one exist? Or is there another place I
We currently use a commercial system, but it works great for us, and the
price really isnt that bad. It also is mostly written in PHP so you can
change a good bit of it if you need to.
The proprietarey part is the C binary that injects emails received into
the database.
http://www.cerberusweb.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 06:40:41PM +0100, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> replacing it with RT (bestpractical.com). A really great, widely used,
> stable and extensible system. It just need some work to feet our needs
> but is designed to do that easily. The only real problem with RT is it's
> needing fo
hi,
is it possible to duplicate multiple directories that are not in the
same root at once without rsyncing the root and excluding all other
dirs?
I want:
rsync -avz server:/dir1 /backup/server1/dir1 \
server:/dir2 /backup/server1/otherdir/dir2
a so on, but this is bad syntax for rsy
We currently use a commercial system, but it works great for us, and the
price really isnt that bad. It also is mostly written in PHP so you can
change a good bit of it if you need to.
The proprietarey part is the C binary that injects emails received into
the database.
http://www.cerberusweb.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 06:40:41PM +0100, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> replacing it with RT (bestpractical.com). A really great, widely used,
> stable and extensible system. It just need some work to feet our needs
> but is designed to do that easily. The only real problem with RT is it's
> needing fo
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 04:01:30PM -, Dan Ros wrote:
> We are looking for a open source ticketing system. This is to be a internal
> ticketing system, for escalated queries only, ie; not general tech support
> queries. The helpdesk has their own proprietary system they use. At the
> moment we a
hi,
is it possible to duplicate multiple directories that are not in the
same root at once without rsyncing the root and excluding all other
dirs?
I want:
rsync -avz server:/dir1 /backup/server1/dir1 \
server:/dir2 /backup/server1/otherdir/dir2
a so on, but this is bad syntax for rsy
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 04:01:30PM -, Dan Ros wrote:
> We are looking for a open source ticketing system. This is to be a internal
> ticketing system, for escalated queries only, ie; not general tech support
> queries. The helpdesk has their own proprietary system they use. At the
> moment we a
We use http://helpdesk.oneorzero.com/
Matias Lambert
OSInet Telecomunicaciones
Capital Federal - Buenos Aires
Argentina - CA1185ACA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osinet.com.ar
I dont know what kind of weapons will be used in the third world war,
assuming there will be a third world war. But I c
We're thinking of using http://otrs.org/screenshot/ .
Maarten
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 04:01:30PM -, Dan Ros wrote:
> We are looking for a open source ticketing system. This is to be a internal
> ticketing system, for escalated queries only, ie; not general tech support
> queries. The helpdesk has their own proprietary system they use. At the
> moment we a
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 04:01:30PM -, Dan Ros wrote:
> We are looking for a open source ticketing system. This is to be a internal
> ticketing system, for escalated queries only, ie; not general tech support
> queries. The helpdesk has their own proprietary system they use. At the
> moment we a
We use http://helpdesk.oneorzero.com/
Matias Lambert
OSInet Telecomunicaciones
Capital Federal - Buenos Aires
Argentina - CA1185ACA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osinet.com.ar
I dont know what kind of weapons will be used in the third world war,
assuming there will be a third world war. But I c
* Dan Ros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-10 17:10]:
> We are looking for a open source ticketing system. This is to be a internal
> ticketing system, for escalated queries only, ie; not general tech support
> queries. The helpdesk has their own proprietary system they use. At the
> moment we are modi
We're thinking of using http://otrs.org/screenshot/ .
Maarten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Dan Ros wrote:
> We are looking for a open source ticketing system. This is to be a
> internal ticketing system, for escalated queries only, ie; not
> general tech support queries. The helpdesk has their own proprietary
> system they use. At the moment we are modifying bugzilla to fit our
> needs
We are looking for a open source ticketing system. This is to be a internal
ticketing system, for escalated queries only, ie; not general tech support
queries. The helpdesk has their own proprietary system they use. At the
moment we are modifying bugzilla to fit our needs, but I was wondering what
* Dan Ros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-10 17:10]:
> We are looking for a open source ticketing system. This is to be a internal
> ticketing system, for escalated queries only, ie; not general tech support
> queries. The helpdesk has their own proprietary system they use. At the
> moment we are modi
* Dan Ros wrote:
> We are looking for a open source ticketing system. This is to be a
> internal ticketing system, for escalated queries only, ie; not
> general tech support queries. The helpdesk has their own proprietary
> system they use. At the moment we are modifying bugzilla to fit our
> needs
We are looking for a open source ticketing system. This is to be a internal
ticketing system, for escalated queries only, ie; not general tech support
queries. The helpdesk has their own proprietary system they use. At the
moment we are modifying bugzilla to fit our needs, but I was wondering what
I have a minor problem with XFS file-system quotas.
Filesystem quotas are working, but I can not view the quota as a regular user.
However, I can view the quota info as root.
myserver:~$ quota -v -F xfs
Disk quotas for user anut2 (uid 4878):
Filesystem blocks quota limit grace files
Hello debian-isp,
I wanne monitore more then one Server.
So i have to config it via WebSite.
After it, its HID 2,3,4,5.
I cant set it in the conf files.
Can u c&p me your MIDAS file or give me an example
--
Best wishes
daniel
I have a minor problem with XFS file-system quotas.
Filesystem quotas are working, but I can not view the quota as a regular user.
However, I can view the quota info as root.
myserver:~$ quota -v -F xfs
Disk quotas for user anut2 (uid 4878):
Filesystem blocks quota limit grace files
Hello debian-isp,
I wanne monitore more then one Server.
So i have to config it via WebSite.
After it, its HID 2,3,4,5.
I cant set it in the conf files.
Can u c&p me your MIDAS file or give me an example
--
Best wishes
daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
36 matches
Mail list logo
