Re: Jesus Help Me !

2004-01-11 Thread Chris Wagner
While flaming off topic posts is appropriate, flaming religion is not. By posting ur own rant u are now guilty of the same off topic violation as the original poster. It is clear from the tone of your post that you've been chomping at the bit for a while to write such a religion based rant. You

Re: Jesus Help Me !

2004-01-11 Thread Chris Wagner
While flaming off topic posts is appropriate, flaming religion is not. By posting ur own rant u are now guilty of the same off topic violation as the original poster. It is clear from the tone of your post that you've been chomping at the bit for a while to write such a religion based rant. You

Re: Jesus Help Me !

2004-01-11 Thread Craig Sanders
please keep your moronic and paranoid religious delusions off of our mailing list. this mailing list is for the discussion of the Debian GNU/Linux operating system in Internet Service Provider environments. that's why it's called "debian-isp". note that it is *not* called "Divine Assistance" or

Re: Jesus Help Me !

2004-01-11 Thread Craig Sanders
please keep your moronic and paranoid religious delusions off of our mailing list. this mailing list is for the discussion of the Debian GNU/Linux operating system in Internet Service Provider environments. that's why it's called "debian-isp". note that it is *not* called "Divine Assistance" or

Re: replacing sanitizer w/ amavisd-new

2004-01-11 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 08:39:39PM -0700, Michael Loftis wrote: > ># mailscanner system, works with Postfix and other MTAs. This uses > >unsupported methods to manipulate Postfix queue files, and there are > >multiple reports of message duplication and/or delivery of truncated > >messages. > > It

Re: replacing sanitizer w/ amavisd-new

2004-01-11 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 08:39:39PM -0700, Michael Loftis wrote: > ># mailscanner system, works with Postfix and other MTAs. This uses > >unsupported methods to manipulate Postfix queue files, and there are > >multiple reports of message duplication and/or delivery of truncated > >messages. > > It

Re: Postfix-mysql-procmail

2004-01-11 Thread Thomas Lamy
Fraser Campbell wrote: On January 10, 2004 09:17 am, Robert Hensel wrote: I currently have a properly working postfix-mysql setup. This all works fine, but I would like to implement an autoresponder/other stuff. The problem is, that for example procmail doesn't seem to work with virtual users. I h

Re: Postfix-mysql-procmail

2004-01-11 Thread Thomas Lamy
Fraser Campbell wrote: On January 10, 2004 09:17 am, Robert Hensel wrote: I currently have a properly working postfix-mysql setup. This all works fine, but I would like to implement an autoresponder/other stuff. The problem is, that for example procmail doesn't seem to work with virtual users. I

Re: Postfix-mysql-procmail

2004-01-11 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Russell Coker said: > Neither /etc/aliases nor procmail allows a custom 55x code to be sent. > > A bounce (as used in your example) is undesirable in the case of spam and > viruses. It makes your machine the cause of problems, which then results > in other people ca

Re: Postfix-mysql-procmail

2004-01-11 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Russell Coker said: > Neither /etc/aliases nor procmail allows a custom 55x code to be sent. > > A bounce (as used in your example) is undesirable in the case of spam and > viruses. It makes your machine the cause of problems, which then results > in other people ca

Re: Postfix-mysql-procmail

2004-01-11 Thread Russell Coker
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:50, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Russell Coker said: > > Another option is to receive the entire message, accept it for delivery > > but instead of a 25x give a 55x code with a message saying "this message > > was delivered, but pleas

Re: Postfix-mysql-procmail

2004-01-11 Thread Russell Coker
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:50, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Russell Coker said: > > Another option is to receive the entire message, accept it for delivery > > but instead of a 25x give a 55x code with a message saying "this message > > was delivered, but pleas