Hi,
does anybody know if postfix has a built-in capability for removing .exe
files
from an incoming email? If not, does spamassasin do this?
Best regards,
Koen Calliauw
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 5:20 PM +1100 1/23/04, Craig Sanders wrote:
debian isn't the only linux distribution to have a base system. SLS had one.
Slackware had (still has?) one. MCC (if anyone can remember it) had one.
these are all dating back to 1993 or 1994, so it's not exactly a new
concept in the linux world.
On Jan 23, 2004, at 4:18 AM, Koen Calliauw wrote:
does anybody know if postfix has a built-in capability for removing
.exe files
from an incoming email? If not, does spamassasin do this?
http://advosys.ca/papers/postfix-filtering.html
Package: sanitizer
--
bda
Cyberpunk is dead. Long live
Bryan Allen wrote:
On Jan 23, 2004, at 4:18 AM, Koen Calliauw wrote:
does anybody know if postfix has a built-in capability for removing
.exe files
from an incoming email? If not, does spamassasin do this?
http://advosys.ca/papers/postfix-filtering.html
Thanks, I've read through it and this
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 11:12, Ian Forbes wrote:
This wont remove the requirement for us to carry on using cgiemail, many
of the pages we host use it. However maybe we should start weaning the
webmasters onto something new.
Do have a look at http://nms-cgi.sf.net/ - you can find versions of
Hello. I maintain a small network of debian machines. I've got one
machine that is kind of golden in a sense. It's running stable + key
backports for various tools I need. I thought about writing a script to
take the contents of dpkg --list and ram it through dpkg-repack and
basically end up
Greetings!
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:02:50 -0500 Dale E Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello. I maintain a small network of debian machines. I've got one
machine that is kind of golden in a sense. It's running stable +
key backports for various tools I need. I thought about writing a
(No need to Cc me, btw.)
On the golden machine do
dpkg --get-selections golden.txt
copy -r /etc/apt/* to the new machine, as well as golden.txt
Then do on the new clone
apt-get update
cat golden.txt | dpkg --set-selections
apt-get upgrade
If I did that, I
Dale E Martin, Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:26:11AM -0500:
(No need to Cc me, btw.)
If I did that, I would get whatever was current on whatever apt sources I
was using. For example, download.kde.org has a newer version of KDE 3 than
I have on the golden machine. I've hand backported a bunch
-
NetCourrier, votre bureau virtuel sur Internet : Mail, Agenda, Clubs, Toolbar...
Web/Wap : www.netcourrier.com
Téléphone/Fax : 08 92 69 00 21 (0,34 TTC/min)
Minitel: 3615 NETCOURRIER (0,16 TTC/min)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 01:12:48PM +0200, Ian Forbes wrote:
I discovered this morning that our web server has been exploited for the
relaying of spam. It has the latest cgiemail program distributed with
Debian installed on it.
First thing I did was disable the cgiemail executable to stop
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 01:12:48PM +0200, Ian Forbes wrote:
Hello All
I discovered this morning that our web server has been exploited for the
relaying of spam. It has the latest cgiemail program distributed with
Debian installed on it.
I've setup a temporary form with a 'subject' field to
I use systemimager for complete image backups of machines.
You can upgrade a system completelly remotely.
Has deb files.
And configure it so the network address is set for each machine.
I use it for 140 linux desktops.
I also use it for my servers, my primary webserver went down...so I
grabbed a
One of the worst aspects of spam is the way much of it uses
forged sender addresses. AOL is hoping to stir up some organized
resistance to the practice of address forgery through a new
e-mail protocol called Sender Permitted From, or SPF.
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2004/0122aoltest.html?net
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 11:59:18AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
One of the worst aspects of spam is the way much of it uses
forged sender addresses. AOL is hoping to stir up some organized
resistance to the practice of address forgery through a new
e-mail protocol called Sender Permitted
On Jan 23, 2004, at 7:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spf.pobox.com
Am I correct in thinking that if I set up a TXT DNS record v=spf1
-all for all domains that DON'T have email addresses attached to them,
that this will prevent people from hijacking those domains to use for
fake email
===
Akses Internet Prabayar TELKOMNet-Prepaid,
nominal Rp.10.000- Rp.150.000.
Dapatkan di Plasa - Plasa TELKOM terdekat (khusus di Jawa
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 08:25:52PM -0600, Andy Gardner wrote:
On Jan 23, 2004, at 7:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spf.pobox.com
Am I correct in thinking that if I set up a TXT DNS record v=spf1
-all for all domains that DON'T have email addresses attached to them,
that this will
--On Thursday, January 22, 2004 21:24 -0800 Ward Willats [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yeah? Well, two things:
1) AFAIK, only Debian has a base system that is truly a minimal install.
I suppose some other distros do this now too. But a Red Hat install, for
instance, is like the circus coming to town
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:24:15PM -0800, Ward Willats wrote:
At 2:14 PM +1100 1/23/04, Craig Sanders wrote:
e.g. his long-winded page on the base system, makes it seem as if a base
system is something magically distinct that only freebsd has. Linux
distributions have had base systems since
Hi,
does anybody know if postfix has a built-in capability for removing .exe
files
from an incoming email? If not, does spamassasin do this?
Best regards,
Koen Calliauw
At 5:20 PM +1100 1/23/04, Craig Sanders wrote:
debian isn't the only linux distribution to have a base system. SLS had one.
Slackware had (still has?) one. MCC (if anyone can remember it) had one.
these are all dating back to 1993 or 1994, so it's not exactly a new
concept in the linux world.
Bryan Allen wrote:
On Jan 23, 2004, at 4:18 AM, Koen Calliauw wrote:
does anybody know if postfix has a built-in capability for removing
.exe files
from an incoming email? If not, does spamassasin do this?
http://advosys.ca/papers/postfix-filtering.html
Thanks, I've read through it and this is
Hello All
I discovered this morning that our web server has been exploited for the
relaying of spam. It has the latest cgiemail program distributed with
Debian installed on it.
First thing I did was disable the cgiemail executable to stop the flow
of spam.
Then I did some research. This is
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 11:12, Ian Forbes wrote:
This wont remove the requirement for us to carry on using cgiemail, many
of the pages we host use it. However maybe we should start weaning the
webmasters onto something new.
Do have a look at http://nms-cgi.sf.net/ - you can find versions of
Hello. I maintain a small network of debian machines. I've got one
machine that is kind of golden in a sense. It's running stable + key
backports for various tools I need. I thought about writing a script to
take the contents of dpkg --list and ram it through dpkg-repack and
basically end up
Greetings!
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:02:50 -0500 Dale E Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello. I maintain a small network of debian machines. I've got one
machine that is kind of golden in a sense. It's running stable +
key backports for various tools I need. I thought about writing a
(No need to Cc me, btw.)
On the golden machine do
dpkg --get-selections golden.txt
copy -r /etc/apt/* to the new machine, as well as golden.txt
Then do on the new clone
apt-get update
cat golden.txt | dpkg --set-selections
apt-get upgrade
If I did that, I
Dale E Martin, Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:26:11AM -0500:
(No need to Cc me, btw.)
If I did that, I would get whatever was current on whatever apt sources I
was using. For example, download.kde.org has a newer version of KDE 3 than
I have on the golden machine. I've hand backported a bunch
-
NetCourrier, votre bureau virtuel sur Internet : Mail, Agenda, Clubs, Toolbar...
Web/Wap : www.netcourrier.com
Téléphone/Fax : 08 92 69 00 21 (0,34 TTC/min)
Minitel: 3615 NETCOURRIER (0,16 TTC/min)
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 01:12:48PM +0200, Ian Forbes wrote:
I discovered this morning that our web server has been exploited for the
relaying of spam. It has the latest cgiemail program distributed with
Debian installed on it.
First thing I did was disable the cgiemail executable to stop
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 01:12:48PM +0200, Ian Forbes wrote:
Hello All
I discovered this morning that our web server has been exploited for the
relaying of spam. It has the latest cgiemail program distributed with
Debian installed on it.
I've setup a temporary form with a 'subject' field to
I use systemimager for complete image backups of machines.
You can upgrade a system completelly remotely.
Has deb files.
And configure it so the network address is set for each machine.
I use it for 140 linux desktops.
I also use it for my servers, my primary webserver went down...so I
grabbed a
One of the worst aspects of spam is the way much of it uses
forged sender addresses. AOL is hoping to stir up some organized
resistance to the practice of address forgery through a new
e-mail protocol called Sender Permitted From, or SPF.
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2004/0122aoltest.html?net
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 11:59:18AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
One of the worst aspects of spam is the way much of it uses
forged sender addresses. AOL is hoping to stir up some organized
resistance to the practice of address forgery through a new
e-mail protocol called Sender Permitted
On Jan 23, 2004, at 7:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spf.pobox.com
Am I correct in thinking that if I set up a TXT DNS record v=spf1
-all for all domains that DON'T have email addresses attached to them,
that this will prevent people from hijacking those domains to use for
fake email addresses
===
Akses Internet Prabayar TELKOMNet-Prepaid,
nominal Rp.10.000- Rp.150.000.
Dapatkan di Plasa - Plasa TELKOM terdekat (khusus di Jawa
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 08:25:52PM -0600, Andy Gardner wrote:
On Jan 23, 2004, at 7:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spf.pobox.com
Am I correct in thinking that if I set up a TXT DNS record v=spf1
-all for all domains that DON'T have email addresses attached to them,
that this will
38 matches
Mail list logo
