On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Michelle Konzack wrote in part:
>But use a self-compiled Linux with nfs and nfsd compiled WITH
>"TCP" and "v3" support.
>if you mount your server add "nfsvers=3,tcp" to it otherwise it
>will use UDP which is realy not good.
Why? from my (maybe wrong?) reading of the docs, t
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Michelle Konzack wrote in part:
>But use a self-compiled Linux with nfs and nfsd compiled WITH
>"TCP" and "v3" support.
>if you mount your server add "nfsvers=3,tcp" to it otherwise it
>will use UDP which is realy not good.
Why? from my (maybe wrong?) reading of the docs, t
Hello!
Just to be curious: I'm thinking for some time about using andrew fs,
i.e. coda instead of NFS. I don't like NFS, due to complications with
access rights (Yes, I use ugidd). But it sounds like the locking problem
ist also not solved with coda, right?
rgds,
j.
Andrew Miehs wrote:
I sugges
I suggest you all read
http://www.porcupine.org/postfix-mirror/newdoc/NFS_README.html
Especially the sentence
'Thus, Postfix on NFS is slightly less reliable than Postfix on a local
disk.'
Either something is reliable or not. there is no such thing as slightly
less reliable.
Especially when it
Hello!
Just to be curious: I'm thinking for some time about using andrew fs,
i.e. coda instead of NFS. I don't like NFS, due to complications with
access rights (Yes, I use ugidd). But it sounds like the locking problem
ist also not solved with coda, right?
rgds,
j.
Andrew Miehs wrote:
I sugge
I suggest you all read
http://www.porcupine.org/postfix-mirror/newdoc/NFS_README.html
Especially the sentence
'Thus, Postfix on NFS is slightly less reliable than Postfix on a local
disk.'
Either something is reliable or not. there is no such thing as slightly
less reliable.
Especially when i
On Saturday 17 April 2004 20:22, Michael Loftis wrote:
> You can not, and DO NOT put your mail spool on NFS. You *WILL* have *HELL*
> to deal with. It WILL corrupt your users mail, it WILL lose mail. It will
> NOT work.
Yeah Well My ISP, as have others undoubtedly, has their mailspools
Am Mi, den 14.04.2004 schrieb Christopher Sharp um 21:36:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 16:11:26 +0100, Markus Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Having said that, the ProLiant ML330 come with an ATA-RAID which is
> >based on an LSI chipset (MegaIDE) which is not supported by Debian - the
> >only driv
Hello Michael,
Am 2004-04-17 12:22:57, schrieb Michael Loftis:
>You can not, and DO NOT put your mail spool on NFS. You *WILL* have *HELL*
>to deal with. It WILL corrupt your users mail, it WILL lose mail. It will
>NOT work.
Experience with mailbox ;-)
Right, if I open linux-kernel as mailb
Am Sa, den 17.04.2004 schrieb Nathan Eric Norman um 18:22:
> > > The installer from woody has built-in support for the cciss controller
> > > on at least the Proliant DL 580 G2.
> >
> > > It works smoothly, but lacks support for the default installed 3com
> > > gig-ethernet adapter (tg3 driver),
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 12:22:57PM -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
>You can not, and DO NOT put your mail spool on NFS. You *WILL* have *HELL*
>to deal with. It WILL corrupt your users mail, it WILL lose mail. It will
>NOT work.
>
DO you KNOW what maildir IS?
// George
>--On Saturday, April
I second that motion !
Just make sure that you are dumping only deliverd mail to an NFS mount. Keep
the spools local. NFS + file locking don't mix.
I chose ext3 for it's reliablity over ReiserFS. But it is GREAT having a
small farm of M$ filtering servers (spam / virii) on the front end.
-Chad
You can not, and DO NOT put your mail spool on NFS. You *WILL* have *HELL*
to deal with. It WILL corrupt your users mail, it WILL lose mail. It will
NOT work.
--On Saturday, April 17, 2004 12:51 -0400 Dan MacNeil
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've just converted from mbox to maildir
Right now
I'll probably have to gin up my own iso. Perhaps I can create a boot
floppy with cciss in the initrd in order to reboot and then compile a
kernel. I have created a kernel already but it was too large to fit
on the d-i boot floppy.
huh? hard? If you have _lots_ of you may take a look at FAI (Full
On Saturday 17 April 2004 20:22, Michael Loftis wrote:
> You can not, and DO NOT put your mail spool on NFS. You *WILL* have *HELL*
> to deal with. It WILL corrupt your users mail, it WILL lose mail. It will
> NOT work.
Yeah Well My ISP, as have others undoubtedly, has their mailspools
Am 2004-04-17 12:51:32, schrieb Dan MacNeil:
>
>I've just converted from mbox to maildir
>
>Right now there are some users with 500 files in a directory, I expect
>this go grow.
>
>I expect this figure to grow. RaiserFS is looking good.
>
>The benefits of running a central storage server and a bunc
Dan MacNeil wrote:
I've just converted from mbox to maildir
Right now there are some users with 500 files in a directory, I expect
this go grow.
Even if it grows Factor 2 it's nothing you need to be afraid of with
extX. Sometimes we have so many files in directory that "ls" overflows :-)
I expect
Am Mi, den 14.04.2004 schrieb Christopher Sharp um 21:36:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 16:11:26 +0100, Markus Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Having said that, the ProLiant ML330 come with an ATA-RAID which is
> >based on an LSI chipset (MegaIDE) which is not supported by Debian - the
> >only driv
Hello Michael,
Am 2004-04-17 12:22:57, schrieb Michael Loftis:
>You can not, and DO NOT put your mail spool on NFS. You *WILL* have *HELL*
>to deal with. It WILL corrupt your users mail, it WILL lose mail. It will
>NOT work.
Experience with mailbox ;-)
Right, if I open linux-kernel as mailb
Am Sa, den 17.04.2004 schrieb Nathan Eric Norman um 18:22:
> > > The installer from woody has built-in support for the cciss controller
> > > on at least the Proliant DL 580 G2.
> >
> > > It works smoothly, but lacks support for the default installed 3com
> > > gig-ethernet adapter (tg3 driver),
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 12:25:00PM -0400, Dan MacNeil wrote:
>
> > The installer from woody has built-in support for the cciss controller
> > on at least the Proliant DL 580 G2.
>
> > It works smoothly, but lacks support for the default installed 3com
> > gig-ethernet adapter (tg3 driver), once i
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 12:22:57PM -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
>You can not, and DO NOT put your mail spool on NFS. You *WILL* have *HELL*
>to deal with. It WILL corrupt your users mail, it WILL lose mail. It will
>NOT work.
>
DO you KNOW what maildir IS?
// George
>--On Saturday, April
I've just converted from mbox to maildir
Right now there are some users with 500 files in a directory, I expect
this go grow.
I expect this figure to grow. RaiserFS is looking good.
The benefits of running a central storage server and a bunch of seperate
web/smtp/pop3/spamfiltering/ftp/ servers
I second that motion !
Just make sure that you are dumping only deliverd mail to an NFS mount. Keep
the spools local. NFS + file locking don't mix.
I chose ext3 for it's reliablity over ReiserFS. But it is GREAT having a
small farm of M$ filtering servers (spam / virii) on the front end.
-Chad
> The installer from woody has built-in support for the cciss controller
> on at least the Proliant DL 580 G2.
> It works smoothly, but lacks support for the default installed 3com
> gig-ethernet adapter (tg3 driver), once installed,
The network installer for sarge detects the t3 gig-ethernet ad
You can not, and DO NOT put your mail spool on NFS. You *WILL* have *HELL*
to deal with. It WILL corrupt your users mail, it WILL lose mail. It will
NOT work.
--On Saturday, April 17, 2004 12:51 -0400 Dan MacNeil
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've just converted from mbox to maildir
Right now
I'll probably have to gin up my own iso. Perhaps I can create a boot
floppy with cciss in the initrd in order to reboot and then compile a
kernel. I have created a kernel already but it was too large to fit
on the d-i boot floppy.
huh? hard? If you have _lots_ of you may take a look at FAI (Full
Andrew Miehs wrote:
You could try with PPP over SSH...
But this will probably have pretty high latency times.
Depends on the service you are trying to route... Is this for fun? or
is this for commercial purposes...
The idea of 'outside' traffic inside my development lan, doesn't sound
like such a
Am 2004-04-17 12:51:32, schrieb Dan MacNeil:
>
>I've just converted from mbox to maildir
>
>Right now there are some users with 500 files in a directory, I expect
>this go grow.
>
>I expect this figure to grow. RaiserFS is looking good.
>
>The benefits of running a central storage server and a bunc
Dan MacNeil wrote:
I've just converted from mbox to maildir
Right now there are some users with 500 files in a directory, I expect
this go grow.
Even if it grows Factor 2 it's nothing you need to be afraid of with
extX. Sometimes we have so many files in directory that "ls" overflows :-)
I expec
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 12:25:00PM -0400, Dan MacNeil wrote:
>
> > The installer from woody has built-in support for the cciss controller
> > on at least the Proliant DL 580 G2.
>
> > It works smoothly, but lacks support for the default installed 3com
> > gig-ethernet adapter (tg3 driver), once i
I've just converted from mbox to maildir
Right now there are some users with 500 files in a directory, I expect
this go grow.
I expect this figure to grow. RaiserFS is looking good.
The benefits of running a central storage server and a bunch of seperate
web/smtp/pop3/spamfiltering/ftp/ servers
Hello Jody,
It is better to start a new thread if you choose a new subject.
Am 2004-04-17 09:58:59, schrieb Jody Grafals:
>Cheers
>Jody
--
Registered Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
Hi,
why not use LVS (Linux Virtual Server) its a kernel-based
load balancing system. check their web page: www.linuxvirtualserver.org
afaik. be sure to check keepalived, too. its a userspace server
managing the LVS system. great software...
regars,
philipp
- Original Message -
From: "
> The installer from woody has built-in support for the cciss controller
> on at least the Proliant DL 580 G2.
> It works smoothly, but lacks support for the default installed 3com
> gig-ethernet adapter (tg3 driver), once installed,
The network installer for sarge detects the t3 gig-ethernet ad
Andrew Miehs wrote:
You could try with PPP over SSH...
But this will probably have pretty high latency times.
Depends on the service you are trying to route... Is this for fun? or
is this for commercial purposes...
The idea of 'outside' traffic inside my development lan, doesn't sound
like suc
I've done some neat things in the past using SSH port forwarding,
offering services from my local server on the internet via my public
servers. Is there anyway I can forward all the traffic from a single IP
on my Public server to my local server? Making a new kind of VPS
(Virtual Public server
Hello Jody,
It is better to start a new thread if you choose a new subject.
Am 2004-04-17 09:58:59, schrieb Jody Grafals:
>Cheers
>Jody
--
Registered Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Hi,
why not use LVS (Linux Virtual Server) its a kernel-based
load balancing system. check their web page: www.linuxvirtualserver.org
afaik. be sure to check keepalived, too. its a userspace server
managing the LVS system. great software...
regars,
philipp
- Original Message -
From: "
I've done some neat things in the past using SSH port forwarding,
offering services from my local server on the internet via my public
servers. Is there anyway I can forward all the traffic from a single IP
on my Public server to my local server? Making a new kind of VPS
(Virtual Public server
40 matches
Mail list logo
