On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:58, Jason Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
most ISPs (and mail service providers like yahoo and hotmail), for
instance, will never have SPF records in their DNS. they may use SPF
checking on their own MX servers, but they won't have the records in their
DNS. their
On Fr, Jun 25, 2004 at 11:09:01 +0200, Andreas John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Good question. I would say: sk98lin-based, so syskonnect.de should be
a source. We use their sk98lin based copper cards a lot (original and
OEM like 3c940). We have one or two 1000BaseSX here too.
The
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 06:34:53PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:58, Jason Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
most ISPs (and mail service providers like yahoo and hotmail), for
instance, will never have SPF records in their DNS. they may use SPF
checking on their own MX
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 08:35:52PM -0400, Blu wrote:
I do that. A call forward to the next server in the chain to verify the
recipient before accepting the mail from the sender. I use Exim though.
It even caches the recipient verification results to avoid unnecesary
traffic. I don't know if
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:58, Jason Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
most ISPs (and mail service providers like yahoo and hotmail), for
instance, will never have SPF records in their DNS. they may use SPF
checking on their own MX servers, but they won't have the records in their
DNS. their
Il 22 Jun 2004 alle 8:40 Adam Funk immise in rete
This is a smarter way to do it. Wouldn't you admit that the problem
is not from MTAs on dynamic IP addresses, but rather from infected
Windows machines on dynamic IP addresses?
Just a note. Since these are infected machines, a first test could
On Fr, Jun 25, 2004 at 11:09:01 +0200, Andreas John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Good question. I would say: sk98lin-based, so syskonnect.de should be
a source. We use their sk98lin based copper cards a lot (original and
OEM like 3c940). We have one or two 1000BaseSX here too.
The
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 06:34:53PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:58, Jason Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
most ISPs (and mail service providers like yahoo and hotmail), for
instance, will never have SPF records in their DNS. they may use SPF
checking on their own MX
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 08:35:52PM -0400, Blu wrote:
I do that. A call forward to the next server in the chain to verify the
recipient before accepting the mail from the sender. I use Exim though.
It even caches the recipient verification results to avoid unnecesary
traffic. I don't know if
9 matches
Mail list logo