Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?

2004-06-26 Thread Russell Coker
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:58, Jason Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: most ISPs (and mail service providers like yahoo and hotmail), for instance, will never have SPF records in their DNS. they may use SPF checking on their own MX servers, but they won't have the records in their DNS. their

Re: recommendation for gbit sx card?

2004-06-26 Thread Franz Georg Khler
On Fr, Jun 25, 2004 at 11:09:01 +0200, Andreas John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Good question. I would say: sk98lin-based, so syskonnect.de should be a source. We use their sk98lin based copper cards a lot (original and OEM like 3c940). We have one or two 1000BaseSX here too. The

Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?

2004-06-26 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 06:34:53PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:58, Jason Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: most ISPs (and mail service providers like yahoo and hotmail), for instance, will never have SPF records in their DNS. they may use SPF checking on their own MX

Re: How to prevent being a 'bouncer' of evil mail?

2004-06-26 Thread Adam ENDRODI
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 08:35:52PM -0400, Blu wrote: I do that. A call forward to the next server in the chain to verify the recipient before accepting the mail from the sender. I use Exim though. It even caches the recipient verification results to avoid unnecesary traffic. I don't know if

Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?

2004-06-26 Thread Russell Coker
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:58, Jason Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: most ISPs (and mail service providers like yahoo and hotmail), for instance, will never have SPF records in their DNS. they may use SPF checking on their own MX servers, but they won't have the records in their DNS. their

Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?

2004-06-26 Thread Leonardo Boselli
Il 22 Jun 2004 alle 8:40 Adam Funk immise in rete This is a smarter way to do it. Wouldn't you admit that the problem is not from MTAs on dynamic IP addresses, but rather from infected Windows machines on dynamic IP addresses? Just a note. Since these are infected machines, a first test could

Re: recommendation for gbit sx card?

2004-06-26 Thread Franz Georg Khler
On Fr, Jun 25, 2004 at 11:09:01 +0200, Andreas John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Good question. I would say: sk98lin-based, so syskonnect.de should be a source. We use their sk98lin based copper cards a lot (original and OEM like 3c940). We have one or two 1000BaseSX here too. The

Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?

2004-06-26 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 06:34:53PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:58, Jason Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: most ISPs (and mail service providers like yahoo and hotmail), for instance, will never have SPF records in their DNS. they may use SPF checking on their own MX

Re: How to prevent being a 'bouncer' of evil mail?

2004-06-26 Thread Adam ENDRODI
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 08:35:52PM -0400, Blu wrote: I do that. A call forward to the next server in the chain to verify the recipient before accepting the mail from the sender. I use Exim though. It even caches the recipient verification results to avoid unnecesary traffic. I don't know if