On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 09:36, Andrew Miehs wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Its a little off topic, but am looking at setting up a wiki
>
> The two that come to mind are jspWiki, and Twiki.
>
> Has anyone had BAD experiences with either of these two? or should I be using
> something completely different...
Hi all,
Its a little off topic, but am looking at setting up a wiki
The two that come to mind are jspWiki, and Twiki.
Has anyone had BAD experiences with either of these two? or should I be using
something completely different... (Am NOT a PHP fan.)
Regards
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 15:42, Pete Templin wrote:
> Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
> > just wanted to run this by some people more knowledgeable than myself.
> > please tell me if I'm wrong.
> >
> > -at the registrar: change the IP of dns0.domain.net to the IP of NEW
> > -change the zone files on OLD and
I am running Debian Sid with Exim4, sa-exim, spamassassin, and clamav.
From my end, things are working just wonderfully.
However, I had an email forwarded from an external sysadmin yesterday
about supposed problems in the way I'm interacting with a remote server
that does "greylisting."
Here's
Hi!
Please check if /etc/pure-ftpd/conf/PureDB exists and contains
"/etc/pure-ftpd/pureftpd.pdb".
Instead of man page you could read /usr/sbin/pure-ftpd-wrapper directly.
It's perl and quite unterstandable (Even if you are not a perl camel).
Further, if the files exist, did you check, if
/etc/pu
Florian Rossol wrote:
[...]
> Why can Postfix start an correct DNS-query for the MX-Record but isn't
> going to ask the DNS-server for the A-Record of the MX-Host?
Not sure if this is your problem, but if Postfix is running chroot'ed
then it might be getting different configuration information fo
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 08:49:14PM +0200, Florian Rossol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> But than postfix didn't start a DNS-query for the A-Record of the
> MX-Host (as I can see in the output from tcpdump). Instead Postfix
> writes to syslog:
>
Maybe your postfix is chrooted (in /var/spool/postfix) and maybe
Hi,
I have trouble setting up Postfix (2.1.4-5) sending mail (receiving
mail works fine) on an up to date sarge system.
I have no local DNS-server running on that machine. DNS queries with
dig or host works fine!
My Problem: When I try to send mail with Postfix (i.e. to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]), Postf
I have a problem setting up pureftpd on a Debian server using the
Debian pure-ftpd package for virtual users.
Debian version: woody 3.0r2
Pureftp: pure-ftpd (1.0.19-3) and related packages - Sarge
The README.Debain says:
"Create symlink to add PureDB to authentication methods:
cd /etc/pure-ft
G'day,
From: "Aurélien Beaujean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
> Le mercredi 29 septembre 2004 à 12:37, Gavin Hamill écrivait:
> > My question is... how does dpkg know that I need to load the megaraid
> > module in the initrd so the system can mount / for init to boot the
> > machine? I've looked in /
We just did the apt-get unstable of MailScanner and SA and grabbed the
F-Prot deb file from F-Prot, We are also using ClamAV, MS and SA as well as
Clam seem to be working just fine, though still tuning SA, I am not seeing
F-Prot running, or scanning as opposed to ClamAV, which we used to see on
our
Le mercredi 29 septembre 2004 à 06:51, David Thurman écrivait:
> Is their a way to set our /etc/apt/sources.list file or a apt-get
> command to ignore MS and SA when doing security updates?
You can put thoses packages « on hold » :
echo " hold" | dpkg --set-selections
--
Auré
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 13:38, Aurélien Beaujean wrote:
> Hi,
> The only way to have mageraid at boot time is to include it in builtin
> (not in module) in the kernel. So rebuild a 2.4.27 with the same custom
> options than your old 2.4.21.
That's interesting..
Since I wrote, I did some m
Hi,
Le mercredi 29 septembre 2004 à 12:37, Gavin Hamill écrivait:
> My question is... how does dpkg know that I need to load the megaraid
> module in the initrd so the system can mount / for init to boot the
> machine? I've looked in /etc/mkinitrd and seen the 'modules' file -
> should I just stic
We are running testing/Sarge for our production machines and for one of the
servers we are using MailScanner and SpamAssassin from unstable.
I know it's not wise to mix the two, testing/unstable but we wanted the
latest releases of MS/SA as they seem to be pretty stable. When we do
apt-get update
Hullo.
I've often wondered this but never been able to find a solution.. so here we
go...
I'm using a custom Debianised kernel on a Dell poweredge 1600SC with the AMI
megaraid module compiled into the kernel. Also, the kernel has no module
support
It's still running 2.4.21 and disk performan
Dirk Ruediger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we just purchased Proliant DL380G3 and installed Debian Linux on this
> box - thanx for all the hints from this list ;-)
> # lsmod
> Module Size Used byTainted: P
> cpqasm294848 0 (unused)
> cpqevt 7232
Hi all,
we just purchased Proliant DL380G3 and installed Debian Linux on this
box - thanx for all the hints from this list ;-)
Now I'm trying to make this box a "silent" one. I used the kernel from
http://people.iirc.at/moswald/linux/debian/kernel-packages/proliant_dl380g03/2.4.26/
and recompiled
18 matches
Mail list logo