Re: why multicasting is working?

2004-10-18 Thread Oleg Butorin
Theodore Knab wrote: Actually, this set of find commands will work better: find /proc/net -name '*cast* -print -exec cat {} ';' find /proc/sys -name '*cast* -print -exec cat {} ';' Thank you for the answer. I didn't find anything. And the question is: why it is working, when it is disabled in the

Re: why multicasting is working?

2004-10-18 Thread Oleg Butorin
Mike Mestnik wrote: I'm not an expert on MC, but I'd think 224.0.0.1 would be routed to your default route. Then the pkt would get multicasted and you would receve multiple responces. Yes, but I received responces from the systems where multicasting disabled in the kernel. IIRC kernel level

Woody and Java with lots of threads

2004-10-18 Thread andrew
Dear list, Has anyone managed to get java 1.4.2 running with 1100 + threads on Woody (with 2.4.25smp)? I currently have the following ulimits set... :~$ ulimit -a core file size(blocks, -c) 0 data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited file size (blocks, -f) unlimited max

Re: Documentation of big mail systems?

2004-10-18 Thread Aurlien Beaujean
Le samedi 16 octobre 2004 à 21:46, Russell Coker écrivait: Is there any way to optimise PHP for speed? Maybe PHP5 is worth trying? We uses php/zend mmcache. With it, we freed 50% of CPU of the machines which run IMP. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: Documentation of big mail systems?

2004-10-18 Thread Aurlien Beaujean
Le vendredi 15 octobre 2004 à 13:13, Paul Dwerryhouse écrivait: We don't use NFS. Only the LDAP servers are using 2.6.x - everything else is still on 2.4. So mails are delivered to your backend mailstores by smtp ou lmtp ? No NFS means also that pop/imap daemons are running on the backend

Re: Documentation of big mail systems?

2004-10-18 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:41:43PM +1000, Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a message of 39 lines which said: Getting servers that each have 200G or 300G of storage is easy. For a mail server, it means either 1G per user (like gmail gives you) for only 300 users or 10M (much less than

Re: Documentation of big mail systems?

2004-10-18 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 04:17:14PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:41:43PM +1000, Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a message of 39 lines which said: Getting servers that each have 200G or 300G of storage is easy. For a mail server, it means either 1G

OT: Experiences with SATA, Intel ICH5, Kernel 2.6

2004-10-18 Thread Henrik Heil
Hello everybody, we are currently running a web- and mailserver with a Tyan S5102G3NR Board, Linux-2.6.8.1(kernel.org) and Debian Woody. The disks are 2x 36 Gb, U-320 SCSI, RAID 1 (ICP-Vortex GDT8114RZ). We now need additional disks in this server, but not at the same speed (not SCSI), not

Re: Documentation of big mail systems?

2004-10-18 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Getting servers that each have 200G or 300G of storage is easy. For a mail server, it means either 1G per user (like gmail gives you) for only 300 users or 10M (much less than hotmail) for 30 000 users. It is probably not enough for a Hotmail-like

Mount options for Optimizing ext2/ext3 performance with Maildir's

2004-10-18 Thread Ian Forbes
Hi I have a mailserver with load average sitting somewhere between 1 and 2. It is running exim serving a couple of thousand Maildir mailboxes and also has a bunch of antivirus / antispam programs running on it. It has a pair of ide hard drives running mirrored, raid1. I really do not want to

Re: Documentation of big mail systems?

2004-10-18 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 05:44:08PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: ## Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Debian does not need the storage for developers to store their mail on the project's servers. This thread is not about Debian's mail service. Sorry, I was indeed confused. --

Re: Mount options for Optimizing ext2/ext3 performance with Maildir's

2004-10-18 Thread maarten
On Monday 18 October 2004 18:15, Ian Forbes wrote: I have a mailserver with load average sitting somewhere between 1 and 2. It is running exim serving a couple of thousand Maildir mailboxes and also has a bunch of antivirus / antispam programs running on it. It has a pair of ide hard drives

Re: Mount options for Optimizing ext2/ext3 performance with Maildir's

2004-10-18 Thread Mark Bucciarelli
On Monday 18 October 2004 16:15, Ian Forbes wrote: What mount options give the best performance, noatime data=journal ? The fellow that runs KDE's news site recently did some investigation of speed / disk usage for Zope's object database vs. ext3. He figured the hierarchical nature of the

Re: Runing Bind under User Bind

2004-10-18 Thread Nate Campi
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 04:32:04AM +0200, Ulf Volmer wrote: On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 02:46:07PM +1300, Johnno wrote: I am trying to get named to work under the user bind but I keep on getting errors: Oct 18 14:39:34 woody named[1117]: couldn't open pid file '/var/run/named.pid':

SV: Runing Bind under User Bind

2004-10-18 Thread Christofer Algotsson
Your user bind would write a file in /var/run, but it's not allowed. I ran BIND this way, I seem to recall chown'ing that pid file once and never having a problem with it again for the lifetime of the box. I hope I don't get heaps of flames for posting this micro-howto, but I hope it helps.

Increased performance and vitality

2004-10-18 Thread scarlet gordon
Feel the Energy of a Fulfilled Life. Visit here to increase your quality of life http://a.wpm.freeinfogoal.com/a/ I've spent fortunes on face creams and anti-aging serums...but using Axis spray MD is the first time I've tried turning back the clock from the inside out. It's also the last time