as it should.
--
Alex Borges (lex) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Step One Group
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://wehave.net/
> Brampton, Ontario, CanadaLinux 2.4.20 AuthenticAMD
--
Alex Borges (lex) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Step One Group
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#x27;) in
> > /usr/share/phpgroupware/phpgwapi/inc/class.auth.inc.php on line 6
> >
> > Fatal error: Cannot instantiate non-existent class: auth in
> > /usr/share/phpgroupware/phpgwapi/inc/functions.inc.php(278) :
> > eval()'d code on line 1
> >
> > Any
r from
> your experiences.
>
> Regards,
>
> Oliver
--
Alex Borges (lex) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Step One Group
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
purposes please lend a hand if u know!
--
Alex Borges (lex) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Step One Group
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wondering if any of you have tested ipac-ng for this kind of
thing. my rules would have to be many (like 500 logging rules, one
for each client ip)...
This tool is sorta made for slip access, thats why i ask...
The box is ridiculously big, so procesing power is not my concern
--
Alex Borges (lex
what ip's in the inside of my squid proxy+iptables
masqueraded BIG network are taking the most bandwith (RX of outside
interface)... i installed net-acct and it sort of works but id like
something more akin to my particular question.any ideas?
--
Alex Borges (lex) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
houldn't be an issue. My
> > INBOX has the
> > > least messages of all, compared to ~6 months of debian-*
> > lists, lugs,
> > > etc..
> > >
> > > I'm wondering if extraneous files in ~/Maildir could be a problem.
> > >
shure if squid works that way but u get the idea it looks
horrible from the admin POV, maybe u guys can think of a better way...
El mié, 30-10-2002 a las 15:39, Alex Borges (lex) escribió:
> Hey... I want to tie up users to ip addresses and machines. This way i
> can easyly mangle ba
Hey... I want to tie up users to ip addresses and machines. This way i
can easyly mangle bandwith, squid acls and lots of stuff through my
woody box
So im thinking maybe the solution is to force users to obtain ip's from
dhcp and, i users take an ip for which they have no lease, bloack them
w
shure if squid works that way but u get the idea it looks
horrible from the admin POV, maybe u guys can think of a better way...
El mié, 30-10-2002 a las 15:39, Alex Borges (lex) escribió:
> Hey... I want to tie up users to ip addresses and machines. This way i
> can easyly mangle ba
Hey... I want to tie up users to ip addresses and machines. This way i
can easyly mangle bandwith, squid acls and lots of stuff through my
woody box
So im thinking maybe the solution is to force users to obtain ip's from
dhcp and, i users take an ip for which they have no lease, bloack them
w
Solved fo the record TCP_ECN is a bad thing to have turned on by
default i guess most of you already know that... just send newbies
the link to this message
El mar, 29-10-2002 a las 19:06, Jeremy C. Reed escribió:
> On 29 Oct 2002, Alex Borges (lex) wrote:
>
> > connect
Okay... i have a very extremely rare problem with iptables look
here... ive an internal host I that connectos through gateway F... it
attempot to contact website W and succeeds. when i attempt to do so
from F, it fails to connect Now, the problem is that, if i set up a
squid on F, obvio
Solved fo the record TCP_ECN is a bad thing to have turned on by
default i guess most of you already know that... just send newbies
the link to this message
El mar, 29-10-2002 a las 19:06, Jeremy C. Reed escribió:
> On 29 Oct 2002, Alex Borges (lex) wrote:
>
> > connect
Okay... i have a very extremely rare problem with iptables look
here... ive an internal host I that connectos through gateway F... it
attempot to contact website W and succeeds. when i attempt to do so
from F, it fails to connect Now, the problem is that, if i set up a
squid on F, obvio
Um
This kind of thing is simple at least with qmail, u set up a front
end box that does the smtp, make it scan through qmailscan...whatever,
those filters will let u decide the action to take if a virus is found.
If none, then forward to smtp on your real server for delivery...
Probably
Um
This kind of thing is simple at least with qmail, u set up a front
end box that does the smtp, make it scan through qmailscan...whatever,
those filters will let u decide the action to take if a virus is found.
If none, then forward to smtp on your real server for delivery...
Probably
El jue, 10-10-2002 a las 03:07, Jason Lim escribió:
> And think of the bigger picture. How do you expect a university, a largish
> business with hundreds of employees, etc. to select Debian over Redhat (or
> one of the so-called "compliant" distros)? Remember most purchases have to
> run by non-te
El jue, 10-10-2002 a las 03:07, Jason Lim escribió:
> And think of the bigger picture. How do you expect a university, a largish
> business with hundreds of employees, etc. to select Debian over Redhat (or
> one of the so-called "compliant" distros)? Remember most purchases have to
> run by non-t
El mié, 09-10-2002 a las 21:03, Todd Charron escribió:
> If I recall correctly part of the LSB requires using the rpm package
> format... if that's a requirement preventing debian from being certified
> i'm not too sure i'm interested in the LSB...
apt-get install rpm
I dont know what all t
El mié, 09-10-2002 a las 21:03, Todd Charron escribió:
> If I recall correctly part of the LSB requires using the rpm package
> format... if that's a requirement preventing debian from being certified
> i'm not too sure i'm interested in the LSB...
apt-get install rpm
I dont know what all
22 matches
Mail list logo
