On 01/02/02, Gene Grimm wrote:
> We are trying to configure our new Postfix mail server to allow relay for a
> new remote client. Our configuration file currently includes the following
> directive in main.cf:
> smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
> check_client_access hash:/etc
On 01/02/02, Gene Grimm wrote:
> We are trying to configure our new Postfix mail server to allow relay for a
> new remote client. Our configuration file currently includes the following
> directive in main.cf:
> smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
> check_client_access hash:/et
On 21/01/02, Russell Coker wrote:
> I have attached a strange bounce message I received, and would like some
> advice in understanding exactly what happened.
Well, since you didn't include any specific information, I can only try
to analyze the header step by step and hope that's what you are as
On 11/01/02, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:52:15AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > On 10/01/02, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:29:08AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > > > first, the IP is taken and reverse-resol
On 11/01/02, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:52:15AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > On 10/01/02, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:29:08AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > > > first, the IP is taken and reverse-resol
On 10/01/02, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:29:08AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > first, the IP is taken and reverse-resolved to a domain name. then the
> > domain name is resolved to an IP. if that IP doesn't match, it'll DENY.
> > now if 1.2.3.4 were to point to mail.mad
On 10/01/02, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:29:08AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > first, the IP is taken and reverse-resolved to a domain name. then the
> > domain name is resolved to an IP. if that IP doesn't match, it'll DENY.
> > now if 1.2.3.4 were to point to mail.ma
On 07/01/02, martin f krafft wrote:
> please direct me to some documentation on ways to account for user
> traffic on a single machine, acting as BIND9, apache, postfix, and sshd
> server for a number of users. i need to get as close as possible to
Sounds like those users need to have lots of mone
On 07/01/02, martin f krafft wrote:
> please direct me to some documentation on ways to account for user
> traffic on a single machine, acting as BIND9, apache, postfix, and sshd
> server for a number of users. i need to get as close as possible to
Sounds like those users need to have lots of mon
On 09/12/01, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:56:37 +0100, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >On 06/12/01, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> webrt is - for example - completely missing a decently controllable
> >> e-mail interface. Basically every
On 09/12/01, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:56:37 +0100, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >On 06/12/01, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> webrt is - for example - completely missing a decently controllable
> >> e-mail interface. Basically every
On 06/12/01, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:27:32 +0100, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >On 03/12/01, Matt Fair wrote:
> >> Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use?
> >> I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good peopl
On 06/12/01, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:27:32 +0100, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >On 03/12/01, Matt Fair wrote:
> >> Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use?
> >> I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good peopl
On 03/12/01, Matt Fair wrote:
> Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use?
> I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good people say it is (at least the
What do you mean exactly with "doesn't look"? Which featuers are you
missing? Which features does a trouble ticket system need to have to
On 03/12/01, Matt Fair wrote:
> Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use?
> I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good people say it is (at least the
What do you mean exactly with "doesn't look"? Which featuers are you
missing? Which features does a trouble ticket system need to have to
On 20/11/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 10:30:43PM -0500, Jesse Goerz wrote:
> > Is there a debian-firewall/router distro similar in function to
> > smoothwall?
> > All the server needs to do is act as a firewall/router for the
> > internal lan and the webserver. It won'
On 20/11/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 10:30:43PM -0500, Jesse Goerz wrote:
> > Is there a debian-firewall/router distro similar in function to
> > smoothwall?
> > All the server needs to do is act as a firewall/router for the
> > internal lan and the webserver. It won
On 01-08-29 Nicolas Bouthors wrote:
> I already found about
> - Logsurfer (http://www.cert.dfn.de/eng/logsurf/)
> - Swatch (http://oit.ucsb.edu/~eta/swatch/)
> - and many other restricted to *webserver* logs (which is not what I want)
|Package: swatch
|Priority: optional
|Section: admin
|I
001, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > > Warning: time of day goes back, taking countermeasures.
> > > I believe your ping command is using features only available in a newer
> > > kernel. Maybe upgrade your kernel (2.4.4?) or see if your ping has a -U
> > > switch to
On 01-08-08 Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Fernando Casas wrote:
> > I´m getting this message every time i ping a machine on the LAN. And
> > just on the LAN.
> > Warning: time of day goes back, taking countermeasures.
> I believe your ping command is using features only available
Could you please stop those full quotes and reduce the quoted context to
the relevant parts?
On 01-04-30 Felipe Alvarez Harnecker wrote:
> Bulent Murtezaoglu writes:
> > > "ELBnet" == Tech Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ELBnet> Try using: headers_check_syntax = true headers_che
Could you please stop those full quotes and reduce the quoted context to
the relevant parts?
On 01-04-30 Felipe Alvarez Harnecker wrote:
> Bulent Murtezaoglu writes:
> > > "ELBnet" == Tech Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ELBnet> Try using: headers_check_syntax = true headers_ch
On 01-01-22 Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 22:54 21.01.2001 +0100 hat Christian Kurz geschrieben:
> >
> >On 01-01-21 Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >> Am 14:43 20.01.2001 +0100 hat Christian Kurz geschrieben:
> >> >
> >> >On 01-01-20 Michelle Konz
On 01-01-21 Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 14:43 20.01.2001 +0100 hat Christian Kurz geschrieben:
> >
> >On 01-01-20 Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >> Am 22:53 19.01.2001 +0100 hat Christian Kurz geschrieben:
> >> >On 01-01-19 Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >
On 01-01-20 Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 22:53 19.01.2001 +0100 hat Christian Kurz geschrieben:
> >On 01-01-19 Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >> Can anyone help me with the 3c982-TXM ???
> >
> >less /usr/src/linux/Documentation/Networking/00-Index and then look for
> &
On 01-01-19 Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Now I need to change some NIC's in my Router and 9 Servers with the
> new 3Com NIC's ausrüsten and need NEW Drivers and Modules ... :-/
ausruesten ist since which day a english word? Please use proper english
on this list, when you write to it. If you send t
On 00-11-22 Russell Coker wrote:
> Can Postfix deliver mail to a Maildir spool without an account existing? If
> so then how?
> I have a test Postfix server setup with an LDAP directory of account
> information and would like to have the mail delivered to /home/user/Maildir
> under the owners
27 matches
Mail list logo
