to get it working. Any comment?.
P.S.: pwcheck has not man page. I know is it a known issue.
Regards,
Davi Leal
to get it working. Any comment?.
P.S.: pwcheck has not man page. I know is it a known issue.
Regards,
Davi Leal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
get Postfix + SASL + PAM or shadow
working?. I do not want to use sasldb due to I don't know all the client
passwords.
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (woody)
Regards,
Davi Leal
- Original Message -
From: "Davi Leal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent:
get Postfix + SASL + PAM or shadow
working?. I do not want to use sasldb due to I don't know all the client
passwords.
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (woody)
Regards,
Davi Leal
- Original Message -
From: "Davi Leal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <
does
not work. Any comment?.
Note: Using telnet from any machine works.
Regards,
Davi Leal
- Original Message -----
From: "Davi Leal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:57 PM
Subject: Postfix + SASL Authentication fai
does
not work. Any comment?.
Note: Using telnet from any machine works.
Regards,
Davi Leal
- Original Message -----
From: "Davi Leal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:57 PM
Subject: P
le in both /usr/lib/sasl/ and /usr/local/lib/sasl/
directories.
A special thing which I have noted is that if I remove all the smtpd.conf
files in the system I get the same "Authentication failed" message!.
Note: I have removed the chrooted option in the master.cf file.
Regards,
Davi
le in both /usr/lib/sasl/ and /usr/local/lib/sasl/
directories.
A special thing which I have noted is that if I remove all the smtpd.conf
files in the system I get the same "Authentication failed" message!.
Note: I have removed the chrooted option in the master.cf file.
Regards,
Davi
servidores remotos
servidores remotos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc/mail/virtusertable. So, I will get only the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reference: http://www.sendmail.org/virtual-hosting.html
Regards,
Davi Leal
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 17:23, Bart-Jan Vrielink wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 18:57, Davi Leal wrote:
> > How to reverse-map local users for out-bound mail, as in sendmail with
> > FEATURE(`genericstable'...) ??
> >
> > Reference: http://www.sendmail.org/v
etc/mail/virtusertable. So, I will get only the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reference: http://www.sendmail.org/virtual-hosting.html
Regards,
Davi Leal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 17:23, Bart-Jan Vrielink wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 18:57, Davi Leal wrote:
> > How to reverse-map local users for out-bound mail, as in sendmail with
> > FEATURE(`genericstable'...) ??
> >
> > Reference: http://www.sendmail.org/v
Hi,
How to reverse-map local users for out-bound mail, as in sendmail with
FEATURE(`genericstable'...) ??
Reference: http://www.sendmail.org/virtual-hosting.html
Regards,
Davi Leal
Hi,
How to reverse-map local users for out-bound mail, as in sendmail with
FEATURE(`genericstable'...) ??
Reference: http://www.sendmail.org/virtual-hosting.html
Regards,
Davi Leal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
blem, that is to say, it gets the sendmail process running, but it shows
the below message. Is that message important?.
Starting Mail Transport Agent: sendmailWarning: Cannot use
HostStatusDirectory
= /var/lib/sendmail/host_status: No such file or directory
.
Regards,
Davi Leal
,
Davi Leal
elate with
the dns domain name. Any idea will be welcome.
$
$ host 80.25.136.215
Name: 80-25-136-215.uc.nombres.ttd.es
Address: 80.25.136.215
$
$ hostname
dIII
$
$ dnsdomainname
telefonica.net
$
Regards,
Davi Leal
> > Is there a sendmail bug on woody yet?.
>
> Yes.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/sendmail =>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=158445&repeatmerged=yes
I am surprised the fact that woody was released with this bug. I was
waiting to Release to install an email server.
.
# ls -l /etc/mail/
Does not show any sendmail.conf file!.
Is there a sendmail bug on woody yet?.
Regards,
Davi Leal
What must I realize to use IP filter?. Install a package?. Only modify a
configuration file?. Is it a Linux kernel option?.
My trouble is that I want carry out the below 'nessus' advice:
Vulnerability found on port general/tcp
It was possible
to make the remote server crash
using the 'stream.
What must I realize to use IP filter?. Install a package?. Only modify a
configuration file?. Is it a Linux kernel option?.
My trouble is that I want carry out the below 'nessus' advice:
Vulnerability found on port general/tcp
It was possible
to make the remote server crash
using the 'stream
194.224.7.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1
Newbie question: Is there any utility to debug the IP trafic in the
firewall?. Why is the ping from inside to outside not forwarded?. I use ping
& traceroute.
Regards,
Davi Leal
loLink encap:Local Loopback
194.224.7.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1
Newbie question: Is there any utility to debug the IP trafic in the
firewall?. Why is the ping from inside to outside not forwarded?. I use ping
& traceroute.
Regards,
Davi Leal
loLink encap:Local Lo
0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0
194.224.7.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1
Regards,
Davi Leal
--
# /etc/network/interfaces -- configuration file for ifup(8), ifdown(8)
# The loopback interface
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
up route a
0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0
194.224.7.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1
Regards,
Davi Leal
--
# /etc/network/interfaces -- configuration file for ifup(8), ifdown(8)
# The loopback interface
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
up route a
L PROTECTED]
Maybe, is this due to that our SMTP does not support AUTH mechanism?.
Any tip?
Regards,
Davi Leal
sendmail.mc
Description: Binary data
> > Feb 15 09:44:18 excalibur xinetd[316]: FAIL: pop-3 address
> > from=80.25.136.215
Sorry, It was all my mistake. I had an "only_from = net-address" line in the
"default" section of the /etc/xinetd.conf file.
Thanks all,
Davi Leal
> > Feb 15 09:44:18 excalibur xinetd[316]: FAIL: pop-3 address
> > from=80.25.136.215
Sorry, It was all my mistake. I had an "only_from = net-address" line in the
"default" section of the /etc/xinetd.conf file.
Thanks all,
Davi Leal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
onnections. I have
used an infinite loop with 'telnet 194.224.7.3 110' from 80.25.136.215 and:
1.- the syslog shows the FAIL
2.- the /var/log/pop3--trace-file.log shows nothing
3.- the "netstat --inet -n" command shows the above output
Note: The client address 80.25.136.215 has not a DNS entry, neither direct
nor reverse. (nslookup, dig). The /etc/hosts.allow has _only_ the "ALL: ALL"
line.
Regards,
Davi Leal
onnections. I have
used an infinite loop with 'telnet 194.224.7.3 110' from 80.25.136.215 and:
1.- the syslog shows the FAIL
2.- the /var/log/pop3--trace-file.log shows nothing
3.- the "netstat --inet -n" command shows the above output
Note: The client address 80.25.136.215 has not a DNS entry, neither direct
nor reverse. (nslookup, dig). The /etc/hosts.allow has _only_ the "ALL: ALL"
line.
Regards,
Davi Leal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not use them.
* NOTE: in the Debian package this is currently not enabled *
Tip:
# popauth
popauth: unable to open POP authorization DB: No such
file or directory
#
Any idea?
Regards,
Davi Leal
not use them.
* NOTE: in the Debian package this is currently not enabled *
Tip:
# popauth
popauth: unable to open POP authorization DB: No such
file or directory
#
Any idea?
Regards,
Davi Leal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s work than converting to a different mail system.
>>
>>Yes, this is the point.
>
>However, I failed at this conversion, so I'm now running the stable
> sendmail on a testing/unstable box...
I have not experienced any trouble instaling-configuring the woody debian
sendmail package on the potato host. It is on production now.
Davi Leal
s work than converting to a different mail system.
>>
>>Yes, this is the point.
>
>However, I failed at this conversion, so I'm now running the stable
> sendmail on a testing/unstable box...
I have not experienced any trouble instaling-configuring the woody debian
sendmai
> > Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that?
>
> Let's not get into religious arguments, since that's not the question
> asked. He's got a running sendmail config; upgrading to a new version is
> less work than converting to a different mail system.
Yes, this is the point.
> > Not sure but it's safe to use Postfix, so why not use that?
>
> Let's not get into religious arguments, since that's not the question
> asked. He's got a running sendmail config; upgrading to a new version is
> less work than converting to a different mail system.
Yes, this is the point.
Is it safe using the woody's sendmail (sendmail 8.12.1-5) on a potato
distribution?. Note that the host is a server on production.
Regards,
Davi Leal
Is it safe using the woody's sendmail (sendmail 8.12.1-5) on a potato
distribution?. Note that the host is a server on production.
Regards,
Davi Leal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying to use the SASL authentification method with sendmail, in order
to have an AUTH SMTP service.
Debian GNU/Linux (sid)
sendmail 8.12.1-5
After following some installation steps, I get
# telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
22
I'm trying to use the SASL authentification method with sendmail, in order
to have an AUTH SMTP service.
Debian GNU/Linux (sid)
sendmail 8.12.1-5
After following some installation steps, I get
# telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
2
We are an ISP (Internet Service Provider) and we use Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r3
(potato) as mail and DNS server:
sendmail8.9.3-23
qpopper2.53-5
bind8.2.3
Is It safe to delete the ALL:PARANOID line in /etc/hosts.deny to avoid the
below messages in /var/log/syslog?
Jan 22 12:13
We are an ISP (Internet Service Provider) and we use Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r3
(potato) as mail and DNS server:
sendmail8.9.3-23
qpopper2.53-5
bind8.2.3
Is It safe to delete the ALL:PARANOID line in /etc/hosts.deny to avoid the
below messages in /var/log/syslog?
Jan 22 12:1
From: "Michael Boman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tuesday 04 December 2001 21:18, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
> > I'd go with postfix...You can set it up as a drop in replacement really
> > for sendmail, it has the ability
> > to use either mysql or ldap as backend and scales well of that I have
> > seen
From: "Michael Boman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tuesday 04 December 2001 21:18, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
> > I'd go with postfix...You can set it up as a drop in replacement really
> > for sendmail, it has the ability
> > to use either mysql or ldap as backend and scales well of that I have
> > see
Hi all,
We are going to use a debian box as email and DNS server. The goal is
duplicate the functionality of a host which is using sendmail 8.8, xinetd
(pop3) & bind. I thought to use:
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r3 (potato):
sendmail 8.9.3, postfix, or ...
xinetd (pop3: qpopper 2.53
Hi all,
We are going to use a debian box as email and DNS server. The goal is
duplicate the functionality of a host which is using sendmail 8.8, xinetd
(pop3) & bind. I thought to use:
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r3 (potato):
sendmail 8.9.3, postfix, or ...
xinetd (pop3: qpopper 2.53
48 matches
Mail list logo
