Re: SSH access restrictions

2003-10-21 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Rudi On 18 Oct 2003 at 11:23, Rudi Starcevic wrote: Is there anyway to resistict a non-root user's shell account ? For example once he/she is logged in is there any way to deny, say, reading the /etc/passwd file ? We have a set-up that uses rbash. The client gets rbash as a login

Re: SSH access restrictions

2003-10-21 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Rudi On 21 Oct 2003 at 22:58, Rudi Starcevic wrote: Though I'd post something I found on the net about rbash. I haven't tested it yet. [quote] But it's possible to get out from this chroot. woockie_at_twoflower:~$ cd .. rbash: cd: restricted woockie_at_twoflower:~$ vi foo

Re: SSH access restrictions

2003-10-21 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Rudi On 18 Oct 2003 at 11:23, Rudi Starcevic wrote: Is there anyway to resistict a non-root user's shell account ? For example once he/she is logged in is there any way to deny, say, reading the /etc/passwd file ? We have a set-up that uses rbash. The client gets rbash as a login

Re: SSH access restrictions

2003-10-21 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Rudi On 21 Oct 2003 at 22:58, Rudi Starcevic wrote: Though I'd post something I found on the net about rbash. I haven't tested it yet. [quote] But it's possible to get out from this chroot. woockie_at_twoflower:~$ cd .. rbash: cd: restricted woockie_at_twoflower:~$ vi foo

Sharing ppp conections without chanel bundling

2003-06-13 Thread I. Forbes
Hi All I am looking that the posibility sharing traffic through two pppoe conections without chanel bundling. I want to use a linux box as a NAT router, but the outgoing ip's must be shared in round-robin fashion between two ppp interfaces. Obviously each tcp connection will be linked to one

Sharing ppp conections without chanel bundling

2003-06-13 Thread I. Forbes
Hi All I am looking that the posibility sharing traffic through two pppoe conections without chanel bundling. I want to use a linux box as a NAT router, but the outgoing ip's must be shared in round-robin fashion between two ppp interfaces. Obviously each tcp connection will be linked to one

Announce: pyscan 0.3 antivirus filter released

2003-05-16 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All To those who may be interested. I have released an update to my pyscan antivirus filter. It is available from http://www.zsd.co.za/~ian/software/pyscan This release is a bug fix release which sorts out a few outstanding issues. Pyscan is a filter system written in python. It

Re: Debain installed exim BIG TROUBLE

2003-05-06 Thread I. Forbes
On 5 May 2003 at 16:11, Emmanuel Lacour wrote: On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 03:27:32PM +0200, Gregory Machin wrote: where does debian launch exim from cause when i telnet in exim is running but not visable under ps -ef ?? Because by default, exim is running in standalone under debian. Just run

Re: Bad Blocks in IDE software Raid 1

2003-04-30 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell On 18 Apr 2003 at 17:26, Russell Coker wrote: On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 18:48, I. Forbes wrote: Do you think there would be any benefit gained from burning in a new drive, perhaps by running fsck -c -c, in order to find marginal blocks and get them mapped out before the drive

Re: Bad Blocks in IDE software Raid 1

2003-04-17 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell On 15 Apr 2003 at 20:21, Russell Coker wrote: If you do a write and something goes wrong then the data will be re-mapped. I don't know how many (if any) drives do read after write verification. If they don't then it's likely that an error will only be discovered some time

Bad Blocks in IDE software Raid 1

2003-04-15 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I have had a number of cases with disk's reporting as failed on systems with IDE drives in software RAID 1 configuration. I suppose the good news is you can change the drive with minimal downtime and no loss of data. But some of my customers are querying the apparent high failure

Re: Http server with authenticated user suexec cgi's

2003-04-03 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Dustin On 2 Apr 2003 at 8:07, Dustin Douglas wrote: I don't know of anything that does everything that you want, but a good starting point might be the apache suexec docs. For apache 1.3.x they can be found at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/suexec.html Implementing the desired

Re: Http server with authenticated user suexec cgi's

2003-04-03 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Dustin On 2 Apr 2003 at 8:07, Dustin Douglas wrote: I don't know of anything that does everything that you want, but a good starting point might be the apache suexec docs. For apache 1.3.x they can be found at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/suexec.html Implementing the desired

Http server with authenticated user suexec cgi's

2003-04-02 Thread I. Forbes
Hi All I have been playing with scripts to implement some intranet functions via a webrowser cgi interface. However I quicky run into a problem with all cgi scripts running with a single uid/gid (normally that of the apache server). To make things work, I must give the httpd server user more

Http server with authenticated user suexec cgi's

2003-04-02 Thread I. Forbes
Hi All I have been playing with scripts to implement some intranet functions via a webrowser cgi interface. However I quicky run into a problem with all cgi scripts running with a single uid/gid (normally that of the apache server). To make things work, I must give the httpd server user more

ANNOUNCE: pyscan Anti-Virus Filter Software

2003-03-11 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I have put together an antivirus filter for use with Exim. The filter is written in Python, and it works by examining Mime headers in e-mail messages. It does not make use of a pattern database. You could describe it as an upgrade to the antivirus Exim system filter published on the

Re: 400 000 mails in 12 Hours

2003-02-28 Thread I. Forbes
Hello debian-isp On 27 Feb 2003 at 12:10, debian-isp wrote: I have the task of setting up a mailserver capabel of sending 400 000 mail in a max time of 12 hours. All mails have an attachment of 1 mb. The system should be a mailer for a newsletter system. As I made quite a couple of things

Re: 400 000 mails in 12 Hours

2003-02-28 Thread I. Forbes
Hello debian-isp On 27 Feb 2003 at 12:10, debian-isp wrote: I have the task of setting up a mailserver capabel of sending 400 000 mail in a max time of 12 hours. All mails have an attachment of 1 mb. The system should be a mailer for a newsletter system. As I made quite a couple of things

Re: ISP Billing Software / RODOPI

2003-02-26 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Kirk On 25 Feb 2003 at 14:08, Kirk Ismay wrote: Finally, one thing I've been considering is to use SQL-Ledger (http://www.sql-ledger.org/) as a core accounting system and re-write my recurring billing and provisioning programms as add on modules. I can't promise that I'd be able to do

Re: swapon not run at boot with raid drives

2003-01-22 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell On 21 Jan 2003 at 11:30, Russell Coker wrote: There was a bug in 2.2.x kernels which could cause a kernel panic if you swaped on a RAID device that was re-syncing. AFAIK 2.4.x had it fixed long ago. So if you are running a 2.4.x kernel you can just edit the shell script

swapon not run at boot with raid drives

2003-01-21 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I have picked up a problem with my servers running potato + raid 1 mirror drives. The problem is as follows: - raid gets out of sync for some reason, - server gets rebooted, - raid re-sync process starts automatically on boot, - start-up scripts look for and detect

RE: SCSI or IDE

2002-11-28 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All We have about a dozen production machines running software RAID1 with IDE drives. We have experience going back about year now and we have had a number of raid drive failures in that time. Good points: - If a drive fails, the machine carries on running and you can sort it out the

Re: SCSI or IDE

2002-11-28 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell On 28 Nov 2002 at 13:52, Russell Coker wrote: On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:15, I. Forbes wrote: - If you have a glitch on a drive the raid will mark the partition as defective possibly when there is no permanent damage. You have to reboot the server before you can attempt

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA-196-1] New BIND packages fix several vulnerabilities

2002-11-15 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All The latest bind fiasco seems a bit of a mess: I only hope that these packages will plug the holes: These problems have been fixed in version 8.3.3-2.0woody1 for the current stable distribution (woody), in 8.2.3-0.potato.3 for the previous stable distribution (potato) and in version

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA-196-1] New BIND packages fix several vulnerabilities

2002-11-15 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All The latest bind fiasco seems a bit of a mess: I only hope that these packages will plug the holes: These problems have been fixed in version 8.3.3-2.0woody1 for the current stable distribution (woody), in 8.2.3-0.potato.3 for the previous stable distribution (potato) and in version

Debian Security Survey

2002-11-06 Thread I. Forbes
Hi Joey With regards to your Debian Security Survey (http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2002/debian-devel- announce-200211/msg1.html). Thank you for giving us the opportunity to listen to our feedback on the issue of security updates for Potato. We are a small ISP, but we have

Debian Security Survey

2002-11-06 Thread I. Forbes
Hi Joey With regards to your Debian Security Survey (http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2002/debian-devel- announce-200211/msg1.html). Thank you for giving us the opportunity to listen to our feedback on the issue of security updates for Potato. We are a small ISP, but we have

DNS zone file audit tool

2002-10-29 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I am looking for a means to audit our DNS zone files. Particularly I need something that checks that their are still upstream NS records pointing to our server for each domain that we host. Also I would like to check that our NS records point to valid name servers (particularly with

DNS zone file audit tool

2002-10-29 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I am looking for a means to audit our DNS zone files. Particularly I need something that checks that their are still upstream NS records pointing to our server for each domain that we host. Also I would like to check that our NS records point to valid name servers (particularly with

Re: Bandwidth... compression... saving $$?

2002-09-03 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Jason On 3 Sep 2002 at 6:49, Jason Lim wrote: Lots of email... lots of mailing lists... i imagine that compressing emails (of which i get maybe 50-100 each day... a chunk of that is spam, but nonetheless it uses bandwidth) would yield very high compression rates. We use uucp mail for

Re: New approach with removable IDE RAID Backup (was: Tape Question)

2002-08-28 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Christian On 28 Aug 2002 at 0:39, Christian Hammers wrote: On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:14:09PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: I have a big size file about 33G in /home directory !!! and i wanna backup this file into tape device Why tape, buy a ATA (IDE) RAID controller that

Re: multiple webcams via one linux box

2002-08-26 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Bernie On 23 Aug 2002 at 10:06, Bernie Berg wrote: Hi, I have a project that could potentialy have 85 webcams. The easy thing to do would be to use an Axis network camera and just link to its own webserver from my linux web server (or whatever). But these run about 300 bucks,

Re: multiple webcams via one linux box

2002-08-26 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Bernie On 26 Aug 2002 at 9:56, Bernie Berg wrote: I have tested two Dexxa webcams (compatible with Logitec Quickcam Express), on the same USB bus. I set it up to take alternating snap shots from each camera. This works well and could be expanded to more camera's. That should

Re: Admin for E-MAIL users only

2002-07-08 Thread I. Forbes
Hello rj On 4 Jul 2002 at 18:55, rj wrote: What is the best way to delegate some root privileges for a user which could only create e-mail accounts and make newaliases? I have written a bunch of scripts in Python, that use the super utility to give effective root access to certain users

Re: Admin for E-MAIL users only

2002-07-08 Thread I. Forbes
Hello rj On 4 Jul 2002 at 18:55, rj wrote: What is the best way to delegate some root privileges for a user which could only create e-mail accounts and make newaliases? I have written a bunch of scripts in Python, that use the super utility to give effective root access to certain users for

Re: Spammers hammering our mail servers

2002-03-05 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Andrew On 4 Mar 2002, at 14:06, Andrew Tait wrote: Every so often we have spammers hammering our mail servers (running Exim) attempting to relay messages. They fail of course, however they sit there, some times for several weeks, attempting e-mail address after e-mail address. Are

Re: Problem with RAID1 on kernel 2.4

2002-02-28 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell Yes it was nr-spare-disks 1 I just cut and copied setup from another machine and edited to illustrate my message. I missed the spare disks. :-( At least raidtools2 shouts very quickly when you do that (I know!). Thanks Ian On 27 Feb 2002, at 15:14, Russell Coker wrote:

Re: Problem with RAID1 on kernel 2.4

2002-02-28 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell Yes it was nr-spare-disks 1 I just cut and copied setup from another machine and edited to illustrate my message. I missed the spare disks. :-( At least raidtools2 shouts very quickly when you do that (I know!). Thanks Ian On 27 Feb 2002, at 15:14, Russell Coker wrote:

Re: Problem with RAID1 on kernel 2.4

2002-02-27 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell Thanks for your comments. On 26 Feb 2002, at 11:32, Russell Coker wrote: 2) Then I had endless problems with raid1. It seems that the failed-disk directive in /etc/raidtab does not work. I think it has something to do with devfs - which is compiled into the

Re: Problem with RAID1 on kernel 2.4

2002-02-27 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell Thanks for your comments. On 26 Feb 2002, at 11:32, Russell Coker wrote: 2) Then I had endless problems with raid1. It seems that the failed-disk directive in /etc/raidtab does not work. I think it has something to do with devfs - which is compiled into the

Problem with RAID1 on kernel 2.4

2002-02-26 Thread I. Forbes
Hi All I have just spent many hours trying to setup raid1 on a machine with an hpt366/htp370 ide chipset. The machine has 3 ide hard drives as raid 1 + 1 hot spare, and a CD Rom, each device has its own IDE interface. The chipset has 4 ide ports and is supported on kernel 2.4. The chipset

Problem with RAID1 on kernel 2.4

2002-02-26 Thread I. Forbes
Hi All I have just spent many hours trying to setup raid1 on a machine with an hpt366/htp370 ide chipset. The machine has 3 ide hard drives as raid 1 + 1 hot spare, and a CD Rom, each device has its own IDE interface. The chipset has 4 ide ports and is supported on kernel 2.4. The chipset

Re: Upgrade a mail server

2002-02-19 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Craig On 19 Feb 2002, at 10:38, Craig Sanders wrote: i'd love to convert it over to Maildir/ but haven't yet found any way that doesn't involve many hours of downtime while converting the mailboxes from mbox format to Maildir. I did this a while back. It is possible with very little

Re: Diverting smtp traffic

2002-02-15 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Jeremy On 14 Feb 2002, at 9:14, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: old server directly to the new one. I have tried ipmasqadm -- portfw but there is no masquerading involved and it does not work. Does not work? (Show us.) This machine has two network cards, one with masquerading onto a

Re: Diverting smtp traffic

2002-02-15 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Jeremy On 14 Feb 2002, at 9:14, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: old server directly to the new one. I have tried ipmasqadm -- portfw but there is no masquerading involved and it does not work. Does not work? (Show us.) This machine has two network cards, one with masquerading onto a

Diverting smtp traffic

2002-02-14 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I have an old e-mail server that is still accepting e-mail for some domains. The MX records for these domains are controlled by other parties and getting them changed would be a bit of a mission. At the moment this server forwards all e-mail to my new e-mail server. However in

Diverting smtp traffic

2002-02-14 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I have an old e-mail server that is still accepting e-mail for some domains. The MX records for these domains are controlled by other parties and getting them changed would be a bit of a mission. At the moment this server forwards all e-mail to my new e-mail server. However in the

Re: dist-upgrade on remote server

2002-02-05 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Andreas It should be possible. I upgraded a number machines from slink to potato - remotely but I have not started on remote potato to woody upgrades yet. If helps if you have practised on a local machine. I suggest you take a few precautions: - use apt-get -d to download

Re: AW: dist-upgrade on remote server

2002-02-05 Thread I. Forbes
surely is not in the default kernel... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Donovan Baarda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2002 14:08 An: I. Forbes Cc: Andreas Rabus; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: dist-upgrade on remote server On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:52:49AM

Re: dist-upgrade on remote server

2002-02-05 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Andreas It should be possible. I upgraded a number machines from slink to potato - remotely but I have not started on remote potato to woody upgrades yet. If helps if you have practised on a local machine. I suggest you take a few precautions: - use apt-get -d to download everything

Re: AW: dist-upgrade on remote server

2002-02-05 Thread I. Forbes
surely is not in the default kernel... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Donovan Baarda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2002 14:08 An: I. Forbes Cc: Andreas Rabus; debian-isp@lists.debian.org Betreff: Re: dist-upgrade on remote server On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11

Re: Mass installation procedure for Debian?

2002-02-04 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Oliver On 2 Feb 2002, at 12:33, Oliver Andrich wrote: I have to deal in the near future with a lot of Debian machines, that I will setup and configure for two customers. I like to develop or use some mechanism for mass installation of these machines, and for easily setting up a spare

Re: Mass installation procedure for Debian?

2002-02-04 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Oliver On 2 Feb 2002, at 12:33, Oliver Andrich wrote: I have to deal in the near future with a lot of Debian machines, that I will setup and configure for two customers. I like to develop or use some mechanism for mass installation of these machines, and for easily setting up a spare

Re: Raid 1 + lilo

2002-01-30 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell On 30 Jan 2002, at 9:08, Russell Coker wrote: On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:43, I. Forbes wrote: 1) has anybody got a 'deb' of the latest lilo, back-ported onto potato. I am looking for one to use on my stable machines? http://www.coker.com.au/lilo/ Thanks very much

Re: Raid 1 + lilo

2002-01-30 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell On 31 Jan 2002, at 2:08, Russell Coker wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:55, I. Forbes wrote: 1) has anybody got a 'deb' of the latest lilo, back-ported onto potato. I am looking for one to use on my stable machines? http://www.coker.com.au/lilo/ Thanks very

Re: Raid 1 + lilo

2002-01-30 Thread I. Forbes
the machines that can be conveniently rebooted are running woody ) Regards Ian On 31 Jan 2002, at 16:59, Russell Coker wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 04:06, I. Forbes wrote: 1) has anybody got a 'deb' of the latest lilo, back-ported onto potato. I am looking for one to use on my

Raid 1 + lilo

2002-01-29 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All As a follow-up to the closest to debian thread. I am using software raid 1, + IDE drives. On a woody system with the latest lilo and a new bios it seems pretty good. The bios will boot off the 2nd drive if the first one fails. Both disks have an MBR and lilo is on both disks via

Re: Best way to duplicate HDs

2002-01-02 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I am not sure that I understand what the original poster wishes to achieve, nor have I followed the lengthy discussions that ensued. But, a thread with the above subject line would not be complete without a mention of mirrordir. Someone wrote: Sigh... and I was hoping for a

Re: Best way to duplicate HDs

2002-01-02 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I am not sure that I understand what the original poster wishes to achieve, nor have I followed the lengthy discussions that ensued. But, a thread with the above subject line would not be complete without a mention of mirrordir. Someone wrote: Sigh... and I was hoping for a

Re: Journaling FS for Production Systems

2001-11-07 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Paul On 6 Nov 2001, at 15:19, Paul Fleischer wrote: I would either go with ext3 (which even is ext2 compatible AFAIK) or XFS. They really seem to be the most stable. Reiser is not bad, but I have had some terrible experiences with it - however, I do still use it, it is nice, but IMHO

Journaling FS for Production Systems

2001-11-06 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I am looking at moving some of our potato based production servers onto woody, and at the same time upgrading onto a journaling FS. I need the FS to meet the following in order of importance: - MUST BE STABLE (our income depends on uptime!) - Must be supported in woody,

Re: portslave

2001-10-16 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell On 15 Oct 2001, at 17:58, Russell Coker wrote: On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:18, I. Forbes wrote: Perhaps the same or a similar configuration file could tell portslave how to handle incoming calls detected by the modem as being voice or fax as opposed to data calls. Sure, I

Re: portslave

2001-10-16 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell On 15 Oct 2001, at 17:58, Russell Coker wrote: On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:18, I. Forbes wrote: Perhaps the same or a similar configuration file could tell portslave how to handle incoming calls detected by the modem as being voice or fax as opposed to data calls. Sure, I

Re: portslave

2001-10-15 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell On 13 Oct 2001, at 19:14, Russell Coker wrote: I have been thinking of implementing a way of telling Portslave to pass the port to another program to allow minicom or a FAX transmission to take the port. I think the answer lies in by-passing radius. If we had a facility

Re: portslave

2001-10-15 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell On 13 Oct 2001, at 19:14, Russell Coker wrote: I have been thinking of implementing a way of telling Portslave to pass the port to another program to allow minicom or a FAX transmission to take the port. I think the answer lies in by-passing radius. If we had a facility

Re: portslave for potato

2001-10-11 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell I have just tried this on my potato test system. I installed the deb over my old version. I let the install script update my existing plave.conf file but I did not change anything else. The kernel is version 2.2.19 I works fine! Thanks Ian On 9 Oct 2001, at 21:13,

Re: portslave for potato

2001-10-11 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell I have just tried this on my potato test system. I installed the deb over my old version. I let the install script update my existing plave.conf file but I did not change anything else. The kernel is version 2.2.19 I works fine! Thanks Ian On 9 Oct 2001, at 21:13,

Re: portslave

2001-10-09 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell On 9 Oct 2001, at 0:02, Russell Coker wrote: On Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:36, I. Forbes wrote: The versions before 2001-06-20 all sucked in various ways. It was only in the 2001-06-20 version that I really got the source under control. Do you know of a potato deb

Re: portslave

2001-10-09 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell On 9 Oct 2001, at 0:02, Russell Coker wrote: On Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:36, I. Forbes wrote: The versions before 2001-06-20 all sucked in various ways. It was only in the 2001-06-20 version that I really got the source under control. Do you know of a potato deb for the latest

Re: portslave

2001-10-08 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell I am busy testing a portslave server to replace my old ancient Cyclades-Y based terminal server. The old one ran mgetty and a pppd patched for radius authentication via the radius client library. The patches have not been updated since pppd version 2.2 and the old machine

Re: mailman exim

2001-08-28 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Martin On 28 Aug 2001, at 12:50, Martin WHEELER wrote: 2001-08-28 12:14:52 15bhjt-SE-00 Neither the system_aliases director nor the address_pipe transport set a uid for local delivery of |/var/lib/mailman/mail/wrapper post listname-l Look in exim.conf for a block similar to this

Reload one domain in caching DNS server

2001-08-21 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I have a quick question, but I am not sure that there is a quick answer. We run one DNS server as a caching DNS server. All DNS queries from our site are forwarded to this server. It does not host any primary or secondary zones and resolves all of its queries from root servers.

Re: kickstart for debian needed

2001-04-02 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Duane On 27 Mar 2001, at 21:58, Duane Powers wrote: I don't know if anyone has the details on redhat's kickstart program, and whether that is something that could be ported to debian... Any suggestions? At the moment we do the following: - base install (3 floppies + base.tgz from

Re: kickstart for debian needed

2001-04-02 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Duane On 27 Mar 2001, at 21:58, Duane Powers wrote: I don't know if anyone has the details on redhat's kickstart program, and whether that is something that could be ported to debian... Any suggestions? At the moment we do the following: - base install (3 floppies + base.tgz from

Funny Logs

2001-03-23 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I wonder if anybody has seen something like this before. We have a web server running apache which used to serve a dual purpose as a proxy cache server. The proxy cache has long since been replaced by a box running squid. However instead of removing all of the "proxy" directives

Funny Logs

2001-03-23 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I wonder if anybody has seen something like this before. We have a web server running apache which used to serve a dual purpose as a proxy cache server. The proxy cache has long since been replaced by a box running squid. However instead of removing all of the proxy directives

Re: Compiling courier on potato

2001-03-13 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Jeff I tried it, and I can answer my own question ... On 9 Mar 2001, at 23:26, Jeff Waugh wrote: quote who=I. Forbes I was looking at the unstable debian package for Courier, courier_0.31.1-2.dsc. What chances are there to get this to compile on potato, or should I just

Re: Compiling courier on potato

2001-03-12 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Jeff I tried it, and I can answer my own question ... On 9 Mar 2001, at 23:26, Jeff Waugh wrote: quote who="I. Forbes" I was looking at the unstable debian package for Courier, courier_0.31.1-2.dsc. What chances are there to get this to compile on potato, o

Compiling courier on potato

2001-03-09 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All As as follow up to recent discussions on compiling debs on old releases: I am running the latest Courier IMAP + POP3 on Potato. I am also planning on installing Sqwebmail (which I have managed to compile). But all of this is compiled from source and installed under

Re: Compiling bind_8.2.3-0 for slink

2001-03-07 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell On 6 Mar 2001, at 8:09, Russell Coker wrote: Isn't there a security update for that? There is, but the update has not been released for slink, just potato, thats why I needed to recompile it. The compilation bombs out with the following message: make[3]: Entering

Re: Compiling bind_8.2.3-0 for slink

2001-03-07 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell On 6 Mar 2001, at 8:09, Russell Coker wrote: Isn't there a security update for that? There is, but the update has not been released for slink, just potato, thats why I needed to recompile it. The compilation bombs out with the following message: make[3]: Entering

Compiling bind_8.2.3-0 for slink

2001-03-05 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I am trying to compile the latest "bind" on a slink system. (It is a production system that I don't wish to upgrade right now, and I am also not happy running the old vulnerable version ...) The compilation bombs out with the following message: make[3]: Entering directory

Compiling bind_8.2.3-0 for slink

2001-03-05 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I am trying to compile the latest bind on a slink system. (It is a production system that I don't wish to upgrade right now, and I am also not happy running the old vulnerable version ...) The compilation bombs out with the following message: make[3]: Entering directory

Deploying Reiser FS

2000-12-12 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I am considering deploying Reiser FS on partitions in a couple of our productions servers. These servers run Debian "potato", currently with 2.2.17 kernels. These systems are in production and running sweetly, and I would like to change as little as possible. I plan on using the

Re: Dial-on-demand only works once for a client of the linux-PC

2000-12-04 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Piet On 1 Dec 2000, at 13:29, Piet Knoester wrote: A reboot of the linux router gives the windows98-pc again exactly one possible activation of the dial-on-demand function on it. I have struggled for a week now and also taken another Compaq and thus a new install but same

RE: VPN recomendations

2000-09-14 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All Tunnelv is a userland package that works via the ethertap device. It is quite neat and totally secure. But it has a bug that conflicts with diald. Diald will also use the ethertap device if the kernel supports it. The bug is that both packages insist on using the first device

RE: VPN recomendations

2000-09-14 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All Tunnelv is a userland package that works via the ethertap device. It is quite neat and totally secure. But it has a bug that conflicts with diald. Diald will also use the ethertap device if the kernel supports it. The bug is that both packages insist on using the first device

RE: VPN recomendations

2000-09-14 Thread I. Forbes
? I think I will try that one next. Regards Ian On 14 Sep 2000, at 13:25, Werner Fleck wrote: May be it's a problem of diald -- I have a production system with three simultaneous tunnel vision vpns running on tap0, tap1 and tap2. Werner -Original Message- From: I. Forbes

Suggestion for Mail Archiving Software

2000-09-08 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All Has anybody get experience with and/or suggestions for mail archiving software. I want copies of all mail arriving at certain addresses (sales, info, abuse etc) to be fed into an archive. Ideally it should have the following features: - The archive should be accessible by a web

Re: Mass install / Autoinstall (Was: Re: Debian vs Red Hat??? I need info.)

2000-05-23 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All There is definitately some scope for development in this area. Debian is one of the best distro's to maintain but it is one of the worst to install. These advantages and disadvantages are multiplied when you have many machines to maintain. On 17 May 00, at 21:55, Karl M. Hegbloom

Policy for use of Group Names

2000-03-31 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All I am looking at drawing up a policy for some of our local machines and also client machines that we administer. Certain grades of users will be made members of groups with specific privileges. Then I can tweak things so that member of those groups have access to things like read

Re: Easier administration (similar to Linuxconf)

2000-03-30 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All On 29 Mar 00, at 16:20, Smoerk wrote: You know the web-enabled administration software used by Colbat servers? I was wondering if anything for Linux (and hopefully debanized) was similar? Maybe Webmin (www.webmin.com)? But why don't you write some scripts, which setup a

Tarpit SPAM trap

2000-03-02 Thread I. Forbes
Hello All A professional spammer is using a forged From: header line which quotes a non existant address at one of our domains. Every spam he sends to a bad address gets bounced to us. We are running qmail, which by default, accepts these bounces then handles them as double bounces. To